Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › NVIDIA › GV-N770OC-4GD or GV-N770OC-2GD?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

GV-N770OC-4GD or GV-N770OC-2GD?  

post #1 of 9
Thread Starter 
Im between these two cards and i have no idea which one i should really buy. 4gb or 2gb version? Im using only one screen 22inches full hd one, games id like to play... everything to be honest. The biggest reason im thinking about 4gb ver is skyrim. I heard skyrim with maxed out mods can eat alot of ram so i think this additional 2gb would be very nice, also more future choice too. I want to buy gpu in 2 weeks and untill then i need to decide.

prices of gtx 770 4gb

prices of gtx 770 2gb
post #2 of 9
I would definitely go for the 4gb version. Buying a 2gb version now is about pointless, IMO.

You will have some people come on here and talk about how the card can't utilize the full 4gb so it is a waste. I can't stand that argument, and feel it is naive. It can use more than 2gb, and therefore will perform better than the 2gb version later.

Had I bought 2gb versions of the 560ti's, I could have waited another year to upgrade.

If you plan to SLI later, you will notice an even larger difference.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
3770k Z77x-UD5H v1.1 GTX 560ti 1050/2100/1100 Crucial Ballistix 32g 1.35v 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
256g 840 Pro/ 250 Evo x2 Raid 0 / 2TB F4 Samsung BD +/- RW Win 7 x64 Ultimate LG IPS237L-BN 
PowerCase
Corsair AX850 Lian Li PC-K62 
  hide details  
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
3770k Z77x-UD5H v1.1 GTX 560ti 1050/2100/1100 Crucial Ballistix 32g 1.35v 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
256g 840 Pro/ 250 Evo x2 Raid 0 / 2TB F4 Samsung BD +/- RW Win 7 x64 Ultimate LG IPS237L-BN 
PowerCase
Corsair AX850 Lian Li PC-K62 
  hide details  
post #3 of 9
Thread Starter 
it's impossible for me to sli as i have mini itx bulid smile.gif thanks for reply ill read some other threads also and still waiting on new reviews.
post #4 of 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by shlunky View Post

I would definitely go for the 4gb version. Buying a 2gb version now is about pointless, IMO.

You will have some people come on here and talk about how the card can't utilize the full 4gb so it is a waste. I can't stand that argument, and feel it is naive. It can use more than 2gb, and therefore will perform better than the 2gb version later.

Had I bought 2gb versions of the 560ti's, I could have waited another year to upgrade.

If you plan to SLI later, you will notice an even larger difference.

You might not 'like it' and think it's 'naive', but I challenge you to find benchmarks showing an actual benefit to 4GB vram vs. 2GB vram on a 680/770. They're actually harder to find than you might think.

Not all cards are the same in terms of whether they'd benefit from 2x the amount of vram. Depends on the chip, the amount of vram you're talking about, etc. A pair of 560ti's with 1GB vram is a lot more 'handicapped' by vram than a 770 with 2GB is. This is not apples to apples here.

The 770 is roughly a 680, and I don't recall many people actually provably having an 'issue' with 2GB of vram with a single card setup, with the sole exception being Skyrim with a ton of (hi-res texture) mods.

Basically I'd say that if the extra money is not a huge deal, you might as well get the 4GB version (even if you plan to only run single card for the life of your system ... obviously if you SLi, it would have much greater value in terms of longevity).

BUT ... if the extra $ IS a big deal, and you're stuck on a single card for other reasons anyway (like your case), then you'll need to judge whether or not that extra $ is worth it to you when pretty much the only 'known' benefit is being able to run Skyrim with the largest possible texture sizes .. and esp. consider that Skyrim is well over 2 years old ... and you've probably played the heck out of it already. I've never seen it proven that 4GB > 2GB on a single 680/770 (at 1080p) in any other scenario besides modded Skyrim ...
Edited by brettjv - 2/1/14 at 8:18pm
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
xeon X5675 6-core @ 4.1ghz (1.29v, 20x205 +ht ) rampage iii extreme msi rx470 gaming X (the $159 budget king) 3 x 2gb corsair xms3 pc12800 (9-9-9-24-1T@1600MHz) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
hynix 250gb ssd (boot), 2tb deskstar (apps),1tb... plextor px-712sa - still the best optical drive... corsair h8o v2 aio W10 home 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
asus vw266h 25.5" (1920x1200) abs sl (enermax revolution) * single 70A rail 850w silverstone rv-03 XFi Titanium 
  hide details  
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
xeon X5675 6-core @ 4.1ghz (1.29v, 20x205 +ht ) rampage iii extreme msi rx470 gaming X (the $159 budget king) 3 x 2gb corsair xms3 pc12800 (9-9-9-24-1T@1600MHz) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
hynix 250gb ssd (boot), 2tb deskstar (apps),1tb... plextor px-712sa - still the best optical drive... corsair h8o v2 aio W10 home 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
asus vw266h 25.5" (1920x1200) abs sl (enermax revolution) * single 70A rail 850w silverstone rv-03 XFi Titanium 
  hide details  
post #5 of 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by brettjv View Post

You might not 'like it' and think it's 'naive', but I challenge you to find benchmarks showing an actual benefit to 4GB vram vs. 2GB vram on a 680/770. They're actually harder to find than you might think.

Not all cards are the same in terms of whether they'd benefit from 2x the amount of vram. Depends on the chip, the amount of vram you're talking about, etc. A pair of 560ti's with 1GB vram is a lot more 'handicapped' by vram than a 770 with 2GB is. This is not apples to apples here.

The 770 is roughly a 680, and I don't recall many people actually provably having an 'issue' with 2GB of vram with a single card setup, with the sole exception being Skyrim with a ton of (hi-res texture) mods.

Basically I'd say that if the extra money is not a huge deal, you might as well get the 4GB version (even if you plan to only run single card for the life of your system ... obviously if you SLi, it would have much greater value in terms of longevity).

BUT ... if the extra $ IS a big deal, and you're stuck on a single card for other reasons anyway (like your case), then you'll need to judge whether or not that extra $ is worth it to you when pretty much the only 'known' benefit is being able to run Skyrim with the largest possible texture sizes .. and esp. consider that Skyrim is well over 2 years old ... and you've probably played the heck out of it already. I've never seen it proven that 4GB > 2GB on a single 680/770 (at 1080p) in any other scenario besides modded Skyrim ...

You are exactly right. I completely agree with you.
My issue is simply this...

Why force yourself to upgrade down the road before you have to? Everyone talks about benchmarks/games as of right now, however most people don't look to upgrade their video card every year or even every 18 mos. Most like to have some longevity to it.

While you won't have any problems, other than Skyrim, with stuff now (just as you said) what about the end of this year, or even into next year? That 2gb of vram has a much higher potential to limit your ability to perform at a high level in comparison to the 4gb model.

I would much rather have a card limited by GPU than by vram. Just my personal opinion.

I hope this doesn't come across as rude or anything, as it isn't meant to be.
I do agree with what you stated, I just always look back and have regrets on skimping a few dollars when that little bit extra would have made a much larger difference later on.
We don't know for sure how much vram future games will demand, but the trend of the past years has that it goes up as the years go by.
Taking that into account, I just feel that it is a wise move to purchase the 4gb over the 2gb. Not trying to say "future proof" as I don't believe you can. Just get the most out of everything you can. thumb.gif

§
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
3770k Z77x-UD5H v1.1 GTX 560ti 1050/2100/1100 Crucial Ballistix 32g 1.35v 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
256g 840 Pro/ 250 Evo x2 Raid 0 / 2TB F4 Samsung BD +/- RW Win 7 x64 Ultimate LG IPS237L-BN 
PowerCase
Corsair AX850 Lian Li PC-K62 
  hide details  
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
3770k Z77x-UD5H v1.1 GTX 560ti 1050/2100/1100 Crucial Ballistix 32g 1.35v 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
256g 840 Pro/ 250 Evo x2 Raid 0 / 2TB F4 Samsung BD +/- RW Win 7 x64 Ultimate LG IPS237L-BN 
PowerCase
Corsair AX850 Lian Li PC-K62 
  hide details  
post #6 of 9
Get the 4GB definitely. I've seen my 2GB card running out of VRAM on A LOT of games at 1080p.

I can send you a list of Mods for skyrim that won't affect the lore or vanilla play style but will make it look gorgeous biggrin.gif PM me if you want it
post #7 of 9
Thread Starter 
you post it now? seriously? xD its 2 months since last up and i already got 2gb ver running all without problems smile.gif
post #8 of 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torvi View Post

you post it now? seriously? xD its 2 months since last up and i already got 2gb ver running all without problems smile.gif

OH DAMN o_o I saw it on the front page and just clicked it. Woops xD
post #9 of 9
Thread Starter 
haha biggrin.gif some mod please close it smile.gif
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: NVIDIA
This thread is locked  
Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › NVIDIA › GV-N770OC-4GD or GV-N770OC-2GD?