Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [pcgameshardware] BF4 : Graphics cards benchmarks - Mantle vs Direct3D, R9 290X vsGTX 780 Ti Catalyst 14.1 BETA 1.7
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[pcgameshardware] BF4 : Graphics cards benchmarks - Mantle vs Direct3D, R9 290X vsGTX 780 Ti Catalyst 14.1 BETA 1.7 - Page 43

post #421 of 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by revro View Post


that does not matter. 6core is little more performance than a 300buck 4770k
but its a matter of fact, that there is mainstreamwide information embargo on mantle performance on resolutions over 1080. normally they all go crazy about showing 1440p 1600p tripple 1080, but suddenly not a word about higher resolution

dont make me laugh

best
revro

 

 

Don't be so dramatic, Mantle works great at 1440p with a 3930k @ 4.5 with CF 290s compared to DX11 and a few others with similar system to mine, getting very similar results to me, it's quite impressive.


Edited by quakermaas - 2/23/14 at 4:07am
Money pit
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
SB-E 3930K @ 4.5GHz & 1.36v Rampage IV Formula R9 290 OC CF DDR3 1866 Dominator Platinum 4 x 4GB (9-11-9-27... 
Hard DriveCoolingMonitorKeyboard
2 x 128GB SSD + 2 x 500GB + 1 x 1TB Heatkiller rev. 3, EK motherboard VRM, Aquacomp... Catleap Q270 27" 2560 x 1440 @ 65Hz Ducky Mini (Snake) 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Corsair HX850W lian li v2000b plus (black) G400 in MX518 case Audioengine A2 + 10" Sub 
  hide details  
Reply
Money pit
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
SB-E 3930K @ 4.5GHz & 1.36v Rampage IV Formula R9 290 OC CF DDR3 1866 Dominator Platinum 4 x 4GB (9-11-9-27... 
Hard DriveCoolingMonitorKeyboard
2 x 128GB SSD + 2 x 500GB + 1 x 1TB Heatkiller rev. 3, EK motherboard VRM, Aquacomp... Catleap Q270 27" 2560 x 1440 @ 65Hz Ducky Mini (Snake) 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Corsair HX850W lian li v2000b plus (black) G400 in MX518 case Audioengine A2 + 10" Sub 
  hide details  
Reply
post #422 of 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by mboner1 View Post

I am running 1440p and mantle and can confirm a significant increase in performance. Save your laughter, Mantle is indeed better than directx @ 1440p, or any resolution.

Best
Mboner1 tongue.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by quakermaas View Post


Don't be so dramatic, Mantle works great at 1440p with a 3930k @ 4.5 with CF 290s compared to DX11 and a few others with similar system to mine, getting very similar results to me, it's quite impressive.
if its 7% more fps per card, with cf you get 14%. as from the link i posted the diff was 59,9-55,4fps so with 2 cards you can get 9fps more with mantle. thats why i am considering getting 2 390s next year instead to double down on a 780
but wait does cf already work for mantle? afaik right now cf doesnot work with mantle.

yeah it is dramatic as its a fact, that for some unknown reason all of the big sites stick to 1080 reporting, while they usually show us 1440/1600p numbers as well. just this time they dont

@grunion: when will you publish your test results smile.gif

best
revro
post #423 of 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by revro View Post


if its 7% more fps per card, with cf you get 14%. as from the link i posted the diff was 59,9-55,4fps so with 2 cards you can get 9fps more with mantle. thats why i am considering getting 2 390s next year instead to double down on a 780
but wait does cf already work for mantle? afaik right now cf doesnot work with mantle.

yeah it is dramatic as its a fact, that for some unknown reason all of the big sites stick to 1080 reporting, while they usually show us 1440/1600p numbers as well. just this time they dont

@grunion: when will you publish your test results smile.gif

best
revro
right timing for the 390, give it a year or 2year then we judge mantle. Mantle is only less than a month old now, still too early to judge them
Gaming Rig
(10 items)
 
Work/Web Rig
(11 items)
 
Web Rig
(8 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-2500K @4GHz stock volt OC Asus P8Z77-V LK Palit GTX 750Ti StormX Dual Corsair Vengence 1600MHz_CL8 4GBx4 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Seagate 80GB 7200rpm Maxtor 250GB 7200rpm Cooler Master Hyper 212+ Windows 10 Pro 
MonitorCase
BenQ XL2720z @ 1920x1080 144Hz Silverstone Ps06 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Quad Q9650 Gigabyte EP41-UD3L Asus 1GB Radeon 7790 DirectCU OC Corsair Gaming Ram 2GBx2 DDR2-800 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 80GB 7200rpm Western Digital 200GB 7200rpm Cooler Master Hyper TX3 Windows 7 pro 
MonitorPowerCase
Samsung 226bw 1680x1050 Acbel iPower 510w (450w PSU) LianLi PS05 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD E350 MSI E350IA-E45 AMD Radeon 6310 4GB Kingston DDR3 1333 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Western Digital 80GB Linux Slackware 14.1 Samsung 22" 1680x1050 LCD Acbel 300w PSU 
  hide details  
Reply
Gaming Rig
(10 items)
 
Work/Web Rig
(11 items)
 
Web Rig
(8 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-2500K @4GHz stock volt OC Asus P8Z77-V LK Palit GTX 750Ti StormX Dual Corsair Vengence 1600MHz_CL8 4GBx4 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Seagate 80GB 7200rpm Maxtor 250GB 7200rpm Cooler Master Hyper 212+ Windows 10 Pro 
MonitorCase
BenQ XL2720z @ 1920x1080 144Hz Silverstone Ps06 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Quad Q9650 Gigabyte EP41-UD3L Asus 1GB Radeon 7790 DirectCU OC Corsair Gaming Ram 2GBx2 DDR2-800 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 80GB 7200rpm Western Digital 200GB 7200rpm Cooler Master Hyper TX3 Windows 7 pro 
MonitorPowerCase
Samsung 226bw 1680x1050 Acbel iPower 510w (450w PSU) LianLi PS05 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD E350 MSI E350IA-E45 AMD Radeon 6310 4GB Kingston DDR3 1333 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Western Digital 80GB Linux Slackware 14.1 Samsung 22" 1680x1050 LCD Acbel 300w PSU 
  hide details  
Reply
post #424 of 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by revro View Post



if its 7% more fps per card, with cf you get 14%. as from the link i posted the diff was 59,9-55,4fps so with 2 cards you can get 9fps more with mantle. thats why i am considering getting 2 390s next year instead to double down on a 780
but wait does cf already work for mantle? afaik right now cf doesnot work with mantle.

yeah it is dramatic as its a fact, that for some unknown reason all of the big sites stick to 1080 reporting, while they usually show us 1440/1600p numbers as well. just this time they dont

@grunion: when will you publish your test results smile.gif

best
revro

 

CF works OK, but can be un-stable at times (BSOD, lock up),AMD don't recommend using Mantle and CF. 

Money pit
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
SB-E 3930K @ 4.5GHz & 1.36v Rampage IV Formula R9 290 OC CF DDR3 1866 Dominator Platinum 4 x 4GB (9-11-9-27... 
Hard DriveCoolingMonitorKeyboard
2 x 128GB SSD + 2 x 500GB + 1 x 1TB Heatkiller rev. 3, EK motherboard VRM, Aquacomp... Catleap Q270 27" 2560 x 1440 @ 65Hz Ducky Mini (Snake) 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Corsair HX850W lian li v2000b plus (black) G400 in MX518 case Audioengine A2 + 10" Sub 
  hide details  
Reply
Money pit
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
SB-E 3930K @ 4.5GHz & 1.36v Rampage IV Formula R9 290 OC CF DDR3 1866 Dominator Platinum 4 x 4GB (9-11-9-27... 
Hard DriveCoolingMonitorKeyboard
2 x 128GB SSD + 2 x 500GB + 1 x 1TB Heatkiller rev. 3, EK motherboard VRM, Aquacomp... Catleap Q270 27" 2560 x 1440 @ 65Hz Ducky Mini (Snake) 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Corsair HX850W lian li v2000b plus (black) G400 in MX518 case Audioengine A2 + 10" Sub 
  hide details  
Reply
post #425 of 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clocknut View Post

u Nvidia guys just missing the point.

Hahaha, you think? they dont miss it at all, they just defend the "superiority" of Nvidia eco system, and trying to justify their purschase, that's all, why admit Mantle is awesome when they can say,

"I will oc my gpu/cpu and make up for the difference on Mantle" because as we already know, oc don't work on Mantle mad.gif
My System
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500K @4.7ghz(1.39v) 24/7 +D14 Asus P8Z77-V Sapphire R9 290 Tri X @1160/1600 8GB HyperX @2133 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
WD Blue EZEX 1TB & Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (OS) Asus Nocuta NH D14 WIN 7 64 Ultimate 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
NEC 2490wuxi (rev 1) Logitech Wave Cooler Master Vanguard 850W Cooler Master HAF 932 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitech G5 Cooler Master Xonar STX+ HD595 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500K @4.7ghz(1.39v) 24/7 +D14 Asus P8Z77-V Sapphire R9 290 Tri X @1160/1600 8GB HyperX @2133 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
WD Blue EZEX 1TB & Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (OS) Asus Nocuta NH D14 WIN 7 64 Ultimate 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
NEC 2490wuxi (rev 1) Logitech Wave Cooler Master Vanguard 850W Cooler Master HAF 932 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitech G5 Cooler Master Xonar STX+ HD595 
  hide details  
Reply
post #426 of 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by revro View Post


if its 7% more fps per card, with cf you get 14%. as from the link i posted the diff was 59,9-55,4fps so with 2 cards you can get 9fps more with mantle. thats why i am considering getting 2 390s next year instead to double down on a 780
but wait does cf already work for mantle? afaik right now cf doesnot work with mantle.

yeah it is dramatic as its a fact, that for some unknown reason all of the big sites stick to 1080 reporting, while they usually show us 1440/1600p numbers as well. just this time they dont

@grunion: when will you publish your test results smile.gif

best
revro

1600P bench? VRAM will be an issue. spend over a grand worth of gpus to dumb down settings? no sense.
Second Intel Rig
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2700 4.5/ 1.28 77 290 (2) 16 / 1866 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
1000 360/240 10 64 28 2160 
PowerCase
850 540 
  hide details  
Reply
Second Intel Rig
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2700 4.5/ 1.28 77 290 (2) 16 / 1866 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
1000 360/240 10 64 28 2160 
PowerCase
850 540 
  hide details  
Reply
post #427 of 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdr09 View Post

1600P bench? VRAM will be an issue. spend over a grand worth of gpus to dumb down settings? no sense.

but if you insists . . .



they all struggled.
Second Intel Rig
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2700 4.5/ 1.28 77 290 (2) 16 / 1866 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
1000 360/240 10 64 28 2160 
PowerCase
850 540 
  hide details  
Reply
Second Intel Rig
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2700 4.5/ 1.28 77 290 (2) 16 / 1866 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
1000 360/240 10 64 28 2160 
PowerCase
850 540 
  hide details  
Reply
post #428 of 589
The only things I have learned is this thread:
  • nVidia users aren't allowed to ask questions.
  • nVidia users are "defending" their GPUs by criticizing benchmarks, without ever mentioning the words GEFORCE or nVidia.
  • Some of the most experience members of this site are ignored.
  • Nobody can reproduce these results.
  • The results don't make sense for this new API at this stage of development.
  • Nobody is allowed to point out the points above up without being attacked or accused of some such rubbish.

All I can say is I have a very good memory of the users involved, some act identically like shadow market shills. If I find out that you are receiving fringe benefits for AMD or receiving hardware from them, I will follow you to every thread\post letting everyone know who owns you.
Snowdevil
(16 items)
 
ASUS G750JM
(9 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
[i7 4790K @ 4.4 GHz (1.186v)] [Asus Sabertooth Z97 Mark S] [nVidia Geforce GTX 1080] [nVidia Geforce GTX 1080] 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
[G.Skill 32GB DDR3 2133 MHz] [Crucial MX100 256GB] [Phanteks PH-TC12DX] [Win 10.1 Pro] 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
[LG 29UM65 (2560x1080)] [QNIX Evo II LED (2560x1440)] [WASD v2 Tenkeyless] [NZXT Hale90 v2 ] 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
[ThermalTake GT10 Snow Edition] [Razer Mamba - Chroma] [Razer Kabuto] [Razer Man O' War] 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4770HQ Intel HM87 Express Chipset Geforce GTX 860M 8GB DDR3L 1600 MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung SSD EVO DVD-RW Stock Windows 8.1 
Monitor
1920x1080 TN 
  hide details  
Reply
Snowdevil
(16 items)
 
ASUS G750JM
(9 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
[i7 4790K @ 4.4 GHz (1.186v)] [Asus Sabertooth Z97 Mark S] [nVidia Geforce GTX 1080] [nVidia Geforce GTX 1080] 
RAMHard DriveCoolingOS
[G.Skill 32GB DDR3 2133 MHz] [Crucial MX100 256GB] [Phanteks PH-TC12DX] [Win 10.1 Pro] 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
[LG 29UM65 (2560x1080)] [QNIX Evo II LED (2560x1440)] [WASD v2 Tenkeyless] [NZXT Hale90 v2 ] 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
[ThermalTake GT10 Snow Edition] [Razer Mamba - Chroma] [Razer Kabuto] [Razer Man O' War] 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4770HQ Intel HM87 Express Chipset Geforce GTX 860M 8GB DDR3L 1600 MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung SSD EVO DVD-RW Stock Windows 8.1 
Monitor
1920x1080 TN 
  hide details  
Reply
post #429 of 589
the only thing i learned from this thread is - it is not better than this thread . . .

http://www.overclock.net/t/1462655/guide-nvidia-amd-pts-gpu-mining

look! they get along.
Second Intel Rig
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2700 4.5/ 1.28 77 290 (2) 16 / 1866 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
1000 360/240 10 64 28 2160 
PowerCase
850 540 
  hide details  
Reply
Second Intel Rig
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2700 4.5/ 1.28 77 290 (2) 16 / 1866 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
1000 360/240 10 64 28 2160 
PowerCase
850 540 
  hide details  
Reply
post #430 of 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by RagingCain View Post

The only thing I have learned is this thread:
  • nVidia users aren't allowed to ask questions.
  • nVidia users are "defending" their GPUs by criticizing benchmarks, without ever mentioning the words GEFORCE or nVidia.
  • Some of the most experience members of this site are ignored.
  • Nobody can reproduce these results.
  • The results don't make sense for this new API at this stage of development.
  • Nobody is allowed to point out the points above up without being attacked or accused of some such rubbish.

All I can say is I have a very good memory of the users involved, some act identically like shadow market shills. If I find out that you are receiving fringe benefits for AMD or receiving hardware from them, I will follow you to every thread\post letting everyone know who owns you.
Wow and that will help. You aren't sounding a great deal better. Its ok to have the opinion, which is valid, that the 780 was not given the best avg clock it would normally see. But, as has been brought up numerous times, the extra clocks would not have changed the order. At best a 780Ti with a 947Mhz clock would/may give the performance shown. In this case it would have been best to leave out its numbers and focus on the 290X numbers. Besides I really didn't see anyone screaming from the roof tops that the 290X was so much better than a 780Ti and how the latter purchase was stupid, then yes you would have a point. For the most part most have asserted the facts of Mantle and how it works, and possibly that the test is somewhat flawed which has raised questions on the authenticity of the result spread on even the 290X.

For now, lately, the thread has focused more on the CPU portion of Mantle and the 780Ti debate has long been dead.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [pcgameshardware] BF4 : Graphics cards benchmarks - Mantle vs Direct3D, R9 290X vsGTX 780 Ti Catalyst 14.1 BETA 1.7