Originally Posted by Skar
I dont think the difference between CRT and the benq@144Hz are noticeable, further this does not explain why the input lag is less in lower resolution, as the frame delay of the monitor does not change with the resolution?
Thats the wierd thing.
Originally Posted by FredgHar
"It wasnt always this way, a couple of weeks ago i never had this problem, i had an 13 year old 10 ms LCD screen (vga-cable), until i recently bought a new one: the BenQ X2411t 144hz!"
Then, the only thing i can think of it's that u used CRT monitor before, which had no lag(i'm not sure why u saying it has 10ms, its not possible since LCD have less), an unfortunately any LCD has. In some extreme cases monitor overdrive that make pixels responds faster my make input lag itslef even bigger.
Unfortunately i'm not very much into monitor technology. Some1 else must say something bout
If u still have CRT monitor u can check how much lag have u new one by plugging them both to card, and run stopwatch on cloned. ofc stopwatch must have thousands of sec to see difference.
I was just stating what i remember from the OLD title, the title was like Samsung syncmaster 840 10ms, it was from 2001 at the very least, and i do remember either 8 or 10 ms from the title so.
I have a crt thats just sitting here, i will try setting it up right beside this screen and see.
Originally Posted by Yahar
Try to use Windows 7 basic/classic theme and disable desktop windows manager service and disable themes.
I'd start questioning the mouse after that, as after getting your benq you can probably feel the slugginesh of cursor much easier as the monitor is not bottlenecking you no more.
You could buy used CRT to test whether it's the monitor I guess.
I have a CRT, i will try and see the difference between the two directly.
And i have disabled any unecessary services in windows 7.
And about the mouse, i have a 3.0, its alittle more precise compared to the deathadder2k13, precise 'keyword' not more responsive, its the same.