Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › AMD/ATI › AMD R9 290 VS 290X
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

AMD R9 290 VS 290X - Page 2

post #11 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladcrooks View Post

290 all the way - its like the 7970 vs 7950 - 5870 - 5850 battle all over again except, i think amd has given more with the 290 thumb.gif
I think the 512 bit bus is why they have so close a performance level, beyond that they are way more than you need today compared to the previous 7970.
post #12 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by thomas22550 View Post

At the moment, there's only a £40 difference between the 290 and 290X. The question is, should I spend the extra £40 for the 290X?

40 Euros is quite a bit.. I mean if you have it to spend I don't see why not if it's 40 quid, i mean it's a bit but not heaps. If it was only $50 difference I'd have gotten a 290x over a 290 but it wasn't. More like $500 to $780+ here haha.

Though honestly you won't notice the difference in games heaps, all the benchmarks are within 1FPS really as I mentioned.
 
Seven Seven Five
(12 items)
 
NASSY
(5 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Convertible i5 3570k (De-Lidded) Gigabyte Z77x-D3H XFX R9 290 With Koolance Block (1179/1450) 16GB G-Skill Ares 1866 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Samsung 840 Evo Seagate Barracuda 2TB 1x OEM DVD Drives Heatkiller Rev 3.0 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
XSPC RX360 Laing D5 + XSPC Res Primochill Bloodshed Red Tubing Koolance Fullcover R9 290x Block 
CoolingOSMonitorMonitor
XSPC EX360 Windows 10 Pro x64 Asus VEH228H Asus VE228H 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Aavara TS742 Dual Monitor Stand Ducky Shine II Cherry Blue RED Backlit Mechanic... Silverstone Strider 850W Thermaltake Core x71 Tempered Glass Riing Edition 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Zowie FK1 House of Stealth Microlab Solo6c Logitech C100 Webcam 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Celeron N3160 HD Graphics 400 4GB DDR3 4TB WD Red 
Cooling
Some 120mm fan 
  hide details  
Reply
 
Seven Seven Five
(12 items)
 
NASSY
(5 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Convertible i5 3570k (De-Lidded) Gigabyte Z77x-D3H XFX R9 290 With Koolance Block (1179/1450) 16GB G-Skill Ares 1866 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Samsung 840 Evo Seagate Barracuda 2TB 1x OEM DVD Drives Heatkiller Rev 3.0 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
XSPC RX360 Laing D5 + XSPC Res Primochill Bloodshed Red Tubing Koolance Fullcover R9 290x Block 
CoolingOSMonitorMonitor
XSPC EX360 Windows 10 Pro x64 Asus VEH228H Asus VE228H 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Aavara TS742 Dual Monitor Stand Ducky Shine II Cherry Blue RED Backlit Mechanic... Silverstone Strider 850W Thermaltake Core x71 Tempered Glass Riing Edition 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Zowie FK1 House of Stealth Microlab Solo6c Logitech C100 Webcam 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Celeron N3160 HD Graphics 400 4GB DDR3 4TB WD Red 
Cooling
Some 120mm fan 
  hide details  
Reply
post #13 of 30
get the cheapest one you can get and watercool - not my cup of tea though, air and always air biggrin.gif
post #14 of 30
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PontiacGTX View Post

No. The difference in performance is few and there are a bit cheaper r9 290 at overclockers uk or amazon uk

But there's only a £40 to £60 difference between the two on the MSI models. Is the 290X really not worth the extra £40/£60?
post #15 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by thomas22550 View Post


But there's only a £40 to £60 difference between the two on the MSI models. Is the 290X really not worth the extra £40/£60?

the 290X is not worth the extra cost. the 290/290X have everything in common except 9% shaders. the 7970 was a better card than the 7950 due to it's pcb and other things involved in how it could overclock. the Titan/Titan black have advantages over the 780/780Ti. the gtx580 had some strong advantages over the gtx570. the 290/290X would be the equivalent of gtx670 windforce vs gtx680 windforce (for example) where the ONLY difference is a small amount of shader performance that comes at a huge premium and doesn't even show itself in actual use.
My System
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4770K @ 4.7ghz Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H EVGA GTX 980TI ACX 2.0  8GB G.Skill Trident X 2400 mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung 830 SSD 128GB 3TB Toshiba  3TB Toshiba Custom Water 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Window 7 Ultimate 64 bit HP 23xi Corsair HX750i Phanteks Enthoo Luxe 
Mouse
Logitech G600 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4770K @ 4.7ghz Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H EVGA GTX 980TI ACX 2.0  8GB G.Skill Trident X 2400 mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung 830 SSD 128GB 3TB Toshiba  3TB Toshiba Custom Water 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Window 7 Ultimate 64 bit HP 23xi Corsair HX750i Phanteks Enthoo Luxe 
Mouse
Logitech G600 
  hide details  
Reply
post #16 of 30
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PureBlackFire View Post

the 290X is not worth the extra cost. the 290/290X have everything in common except 9% shaders. the 7970 was a better card than the 7950 due to it's pcb and other things involved in how it could overclock. the Titan/Titan black have advantages over the 780/780Ti. the gtx580 had some strong advantages over the gtx570. the 290/290X would be the equivalent of gtx670 windforce vs gtx680 windforce (for example) where the ONLY difference is a small amount of shader performance that comes at a huge premium and doesn't even show itself in actual use.

So in other words, the 290X is overkill?
post #17 of 30
A r9 290x would be a waste when the other has very similar performance for 100usd less.and also some r9 290 can unlock to r9 290x
Edited by PontiacGTX - 3/5/14 at 9:19am
post #18 of 30
Reads like some ppl have never done a clock for clock comparison first hand. The 290 will always be slower, even in the best conditions for the 290. For ex. a super gold 290 (1340/1700mhz) will be at least 5% slower than a regular gold 290x (1300/1600mhz). At the same clocks the gap is closer to 10% obviously which is closer to the core % differences.

In respect to single card setups, for the money spent the 290 is the clear budget winner. However when taken to the other extreme in multi gpu setups, what's the difference of (in terms of quads) $400 when one is spending $2000 anyways? Not much and you might as well go for broke anyways since you're already 95% of the way there.

Thus it really depends on what you want. Getting the better things in life always comes with higher cost. And in this respect the 290x is actually not a huge premium when compared in context with the competition.
The 3930
(26 items)
 
Junior's 3930
(22 items)
 
DATA/HTPC
(20 items)
 
  hide details  
Reply
The 3930
(26 items)
 
Junior's 3930
(22 items)
 
DATA/HTPC
(20 items)
 
  hide details  
Reply
post #19 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by thomas22550 View Post


So in other words, the 290X is overkill?

not overkill. the performance gap will always be <10% clock for clock. since both cards clock the same it's a case of the 290X being one of the biggest diminishing returns purchases one can make, as long as the 290 exists. simply put, the extra cash isn't getting you anything a 290 can't do. not getting better compute performance, not getting more vram, not getting better clocks, not getting a better made card. only you can decide if 9% more shaders is worth £40 to £60 to you. here are some reviews of the cards that show what the 9% more shaders gives you in the form of actual performance.

Tom's

here the referencee 290/290x start off at 100/107 respectively on the gaming performance index and with the same watercooler end up at 122/127 respectively. the % difference in the non reference versions are even smaller.

TPU

Anandtech

Bit-Tech
My System
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4770K @ 4.7ghz Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H EVGA GTX 980TI ACX 2.0  8GB G.Skill Trident X 2400 mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung 830 SSD 128GB 3TB Toshiba  3TB Toshiba Custom Water 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Window 7 Ultimate 64 bit HP 23xi Corsair HX750i Phanteks Enthoo Luxe 
Mouse
Logitech G600 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4770K @ 4.7ghz Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H EVGA GTX 980TI ACX 2.0  8GB G.Skill Trident X 2400 mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung 830 SSD 128GB 3TB Toshiba  3TB Toshiba Custom Water 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Window 7 Ultimate 64 bit HP 23xi Corsair HX750i Phanteks Enthoo Luxe 
Mouse
Logitech G600 
  hide details  
Reply
post #20 of 30
I also like to think that generally the 290X's overclock better than 290s from binning. I'm hoping that the average overclock is around 1130mhz for 290Xs and something like 1080mhz for 290s.

I have no numbers to back this up...im just trying to justify the cost of the 290X's over them tongue.gif
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD/ATI
Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › AMD/ATI › AMD R9 290 VS 290X