Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › Graphics Cards - General › GTX 760 mini vs R9 270X Toxic
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

GTX 760 mini vs R9 270X Toxic

post #1 of 10
Thread Starter 
Hello

Both of these cards cost the same, so which is the best choice

GTX 760 GC Mini 2GB

http://www.galaxytech.com/__EN_GB__/Product2/ProductDetail?proID=481

SAPPHIRE TOXIC R9 270X

http://www.sapphiretech.com/presentation/product/product_index.aspx?pid=2038&lid=1

also the 270x supports dx 11.2 while the 760 supports dx 11.1, is dx 11.2 mportant for gaming?
post #2 of 10
Cpu,psu,resolution?which games?
post #3 of 10
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PontiacGTX View Post

Cpu,psu,resolution?which games?

i5-3450
seasonic s12ii 520w
1080p
games mostly action adventure and first person shooters
post #4 of 10
270x because the 760 looks ugly haha.

but seriously, I'd take the 270X
post #5 of 10
Those cards are close in performance, with the 760 often winning by a tad in 1080p gaming(at stock speeds), while the 270x is much more overclockable. I vote for the Toxic, as it is a overclocking beast, and comes at an awesome clock, which probably puts it a little ahead of that 760 mini thumb.gif
Alienware 15
(11 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
i7-4710HQ GTX 970M 3GB 16GB 256GB M.2 SSD 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSOS
250GB m.2 SSD 1TB HDD Fedora 23 Windows 10 
MonitorKeyboardMouse
4k IPS Corsair K95 Corsair K65 
  hide details  
Reply
Alienware 15
(11 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
i7-4710HQ GTX 970M 3GB 16GB 256GB M.2 SSD 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSOS
250GB m.2 SSD 1TB HDD Fedora 23 Windows 10 
MonitorKeyboardMouse
4k IPS Corsair K95 Corsair K65 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbo 007 View Post

i5-3450
seasonic s12ii 520w
1080p
games mostly action adventure and first person shooters
760gtx all the way
post #7 of 10
Well you know in my unbiased opinion thumb.gif

Seriously the 270X Toxic is a BEAST, super cool and quiet...
post #8 of 10
A 760gtx (if it`s not downclocked) is 8-10fps better in some games in others are about the same
post #9 of 10
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PontiacGTX View Post

A 760gtx (if it`s not downclocked) is 8-10fps better in some games in others are about the same

a stock 760 has 980mhz core clock and 1033mhz boost, the galaxy mini has 1019mhz core clock and 1084mhz boost, are these clocks not enough to beat the toxic?
post #10 of 10
It would beat it at stock clocks.dont worry
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Graphics Cards - General
Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › Graphics Cards - General › GTX 760 mini vs R9 270X Toxic