I get a sense Intel is stalling to not be called a monopoly and be hurt by Antitrust laws. They could be stalling to not obliterate AMD CPUs or they simply enjoy their virtual monopoly. Even on the GPU venue I was never convinced they really are incompetent to design a good one. Though I would believe first an argument involving restrictions from patents of NVIDIA and AMD. But even without any of that, their on-board GPUs are quite capable for their tiny size and lack of VRAM. I wouldn't be surprised if they already compete or dominate on the performance venue if they are scaled up. But if that were to become true, they would be even more exposed to antitrust laws. And in this case NVIDIA doesn't have a duopoly coexistence with them (yet?). At least AMD is a partner in their duopoly of x86 patents with Intel.