Originally Posted by PostalTwinkie
Why do people feel the need to cry doom over the image quality when they haven't seen it themselves?
The people who have seen it and said it was NEAR, which isn't "dead on", aren't just random people on the forum. They are rather active and respected members, one person who said it looked good is even a hardware rep.
Just because the Ford Pinto was crap doesn't mean every vehicle Ford made after that was crap. Being TN doesn't default it to some hell of which image quality can never escape.....
near != dead on
TN != absolute crap
Hell, and we aren't even talking about color calibration yet, something almost no one actually does with their display. They take them out of the box maybe screw with a few settings and call it good. Calibration can go a long ways on any display!
LoL...put the gun down, postal.....don't do it
The swift seems like its gonna look very good, why else would kitguru give it nearly 10 stars?
But us IPS guys are gonna notice the slightest downgrade and that's just how it is, unfortunately
Originally Posted by subyman
I went from a 60hz IPS to a 120hz TN and had to go back. The 120hz was nice, but I liked the color of the IPS more. I'm planning on having the Swift and an IPS in dual screen so I can switch between them depending on the game. Racing, FPS, etc on the Swift and RPG, RTS, and story based games on the IPS.
100% percent with you on this