In school this week we got a quick crash course in basic html and then tested at the end of the week and I was wondering if there is any useful way to help memorize it since I know it will be on my final in a couple week. I have no issues with a basic header or paragraph, but adding links, pictures, video to it is a whole other story. I have been using that W3schools online tutorials while at home and practicing but still having issues keeping it stuck in my head for class. Any tips would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
It doesn't really matter what text editor you use just so long as it doesn't auto complete as you need the repetition of typing the syntax to remember the tag names. (Though normally I'd say autocompletion was your friend)
Gonna start here in a bit after getting the kids out of my hair. Repetition will be the key since we have to use notepad in class and auto completion will more than likely be frowned upon.
Thanks for the replies.
On a more general note, emacs or vi bindings (vi having the advantage of not causing repetitive motion injury), will greatly increase your development speed over notepad++ or similar. The learning curve is steep, but it pays off quickly.
On a more general note, emacs or vi bindings (vi having the advantage of not causing repetitive motion injury), will greatly increase your development speed over notepad++ or similar. The learning curve is steep, but it pays off quickly.
Did you read the OP? Learning emacs or vi would take longer than he has to learn HTML for this exam (as well as being utterly pointless since he wouldn't be using emacs nor vi in his exam)
Class Instructor has us do everything in notepad. I will still check in to emacs and VI because I will have a class in the future that learning it might come in handy. Thanks again for replies.
Looks cool, but it's $70. Not sure what the trial stuff entails. I like my Notepad++.
As for learning HTML... just practice really. I hated tests that were based around memorizing syntax... in the real world people just do quick googles to validate the syntax. Knowing that its there and what it does is the important part.
Looks cool, but it's $70. Not sure what the trial stuff entails. I like my Notepad++.
As for learning HTML... just practice really. I hated tests that were based around memorizing syntax... in the real world people just do quick googles to validate the syntax. Knowing that its there and what it does is the important part.
Looks cool, but it's $70. Not sure what the trial stuff entails. I like my Notepad++.
As for learning HTML... just practice really. I hated tests that were based around memorizing syntax... in the real world people just do quick googles to validate the syntax. Knowing that its there and what it does is the important part.
To be honest I don't get peoples obsession with Sublime Text. When I played around with version 2 last year (or maybe the year before) it just seemed like any other feature rich text editor but with the massive drawback of having a non-native GUI. Yet so many people rave about it like it's revolutionised coding. Maybe I'm missing something, but I just don't get what other people see in it :/
I do like playing around with brackets now, but my test this week will have to be done in notepad. No notes, all from memory, joy! Oh well I just keep practicing to help retain info.
To be honest I don't get peoples obsession with Sublime Text. When I played around with version 2 last year (or maybe the year before) it just seemed like any other feature rich text editor but with the massive drawback of having a non-native GUI. Yet so many people rave about it like it's revolutionised coding. Maybe I'm missing something, but I just don't get what other people see in it :/
For me, Sublime Text was the first non-Visual Studio editor I tried out. I liked its feature set and didn't bother to look at anything else for permanent use. When I don't need the full overhead of VS I use Sublime Text.
For me, Sublime Text was the first non-Visual Studio editor I tried out. I liked its feature set and didn't bother to look at anything else for permanent use. When I don't need the full overhead of VS I use Sublime Text.
That's fair enough. I don't begrudge anyone using it; I just get puzzled why some make such a big deal out of it when compared to other products of the same ilk. But then I guess that's the whole vi / emacs thing really
That's fair enough. I don't begrudge anyone using it; I just get puzzled why some make such a big deal out of it when compared to other products of the same ilk. But then I guess that's the whole vi / emacs thing really
So I thought I'd give Sublime Text another try (I was bored this morning
) and I must admit it's better than I remembered it. I might start using it more frequently in place of LiteIDE (which I used to love, but since the class views have broken on that it's become nothing more than a text editor)
So I thought I'd give Sublime Text another try (I was bored this morning
) and I must admit it's better than I remembered it. I might start using it more frequently in place of LiteIDE (which I used to love, but since the class views have broken on that it's become nothing more than a text editor)
The Go support is pretty good once you install all the packages
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.2K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!