Quote:These three things are of very different caliber, and they too adhere to different standards according to circumstances. You have also just demanded specialty and industrial expertise from people who post consumer tech newslinks on consumer tech boards.
Second, you underestimate tech journalists, analyst, and academics as there those who specifically cover the DRAM industry. You will find these people are specialty and industry sites... not on consumer tech sites.
Quote:Please stop talking about a "proof" in a vacuum, it is really becoming similar to that "correlation does not equal causation" meme.
So... in your world, saying "Prove it" is silencing free speech?
Quote:It is the purpose of the task that makes it menial, you are using it as fluffy busywork. You telling people to "read reports" or "do data analysis" is as vague as "break out the math" or "do hard science".
How is data mining and analysis menial? If you can do it, there are plenty of high paying jobs for you.
Quote:1. No one has provided expertise here, and no one is challenging any that doesn't exist. This thread got here because Tsumi wanted secret recordings of the illegal proceedings. And you jumped in and demanded some vague economic expertise from people.
If ordinary people and journalists are given information to contrary, shouldn't they be willing to research? If something is beyond their expertise, then shouldn't they ask... "Tell me more" rather than "It can't be true because I don't understand."
2. A real expert, the ones holding "high paying jobs", can not even prove themselves to laypeople within the limits of an internet message board. So no, professional grade investigative work is not presentable in a text message to total strangers.
Edited by Popple - 10/21/14 at 7:05pm