Hi Guys first of all thanks to duckie and gonX for let me open this thread. I think is better this way to find good information about DDR4 and as I see lot of people using G.SKILL i asked for it.
So i will start showing some of my results that where not intended to Bench but to have a Strong 24/7
This is my kit G.SKILL 4x4GB 3000C15 2T 1.35V
G.SKILL's behave perfect since the very first start on my ASUS R5E mobo, just setting XMP will do what is needed, but i was impressed that with a little bit of tweaking i could achieve 3100C15 1T at 1.35 wich is stock, i saw other reviews that ppl couldn't do it. Yes i took me some days to figure out, but certnaily they cand do it and more if you want to bench. For this reason i opened this thread to show what can be done, it's a retail kit from the egg nothing binned or special.
Here are the specs of my system and a picture
5930K 46.5HT 6c/12th
ASUS R5E BIOS 0802
G.SKILL DDR4 4x4GB 3000C15 2T@ 3100C15 1T (stock 1.35volts)
2x 1TB Samsung EVO 840 SSD
1x 3TB HDD
3x SLI GALAX GTX780 HOF (soon 3x GALAX 980HOF)
SEASONIC P-1200
All Water Cooled
If i have a gskill 2666 c15 kit currently clocked at 3000 at 14 15 15 35 would that be an issue.....i find that to be the only stable clock i can achieve
14 14 15 38 was a tad bit shady as sometimes everything is fine other times it just plain acts wierd.
Is having a cas 14 followed by 15's instead of 14's good practice ?
If i have a gskill 2666 c15 kit currently clocked at 3000 at 14 15 15 35 would that be an issue.....i find that to be the only stable clock i can achieve
14 14 15 38 was a tad bit shady as sometimes everything is fine other times it just plain acts wierd.
Is having a cas 14 followed by 15's instead of 14's good practice ?
If i have a gskill 2666 c15 kit currently clocked at 3000 at 14 15 15 35 would that be an issue.....i find that to be the only stable clock i can achieve
14 14 15 38 was a tad bit shady as sometimes everything is fine other times it just plain acts wierd.
Is having a cas 14 followed by 15's instead of 14's good practice ?
3000C15-15-15-35 2T should be a nice spot or 1T but id you lower 14-15 it will ask you for more and honestly o dont't see that difference. I use 3100C15 1T as you saw.
Right now im balancing out at 1.355 but i have a few issues of my own balancing out my cache at 4.3ghz and clock at 4.5
Tho its 100% stable in every single test out there except prime 95 which crashes pretty much everytime....not sure if im just chasing my tail on this one.
Right now my stats are
cpu input:1.94
Strap 125 base multi of 36
cache of 34 multi
Cpu over...voltage 1.284
cpu cache at 1.284
Dram at 1.355
Sytem agent at 1.16......<< this is what im not sure of how far is my tolerance range.......
Oh and command rate for my ram is 1T...... solid
If i did a usb boot up of memtest would it be as good as running all those millions of different iterations of it in the os ?
Right now im balancing out at 1.355 but i have a few issues of my own balancing out my cache at 4.3ghz and clock at 4.5
Tho its 100% stable in every single test out there except prime 95 which crashes pretty much everytime....not sure if im just chasing my tail on this one.
Right now my stats are
cpu input:1.94
Strap 125 base multi of 36
cache of 34 multi
Cpu over...voltage 1.284
cpu cache at 1.284
Dram at 1.355
Sytem agent at 1.16......<< this is what im not sure of how far is my tolerance range.......
So just ran memtest for 24hrs and all passed without any errors.....might try to raise my ram to 3100 like you guys ut just looks cooler lol jk
Funny thing is my cpu just doesnt want to hit anything about 4.5 stabile lol with i mean i can 4.7 but i wouldnt dare even try to do a stability test lol
So just ran memtest for 24hrs and all passed without any errors.....might try to raise my ram to 3100 like you guys ut just looks cooler lol jk
Funny thing is my cpu just doesnt want to hit anything about 4.5 stabile lol with i mean i can 4.7 but i wouldnt dare even try to do a stability test lol
cyberlando bro no need 24hs of MEMTEST just let it pass to 300% and thats all
Kits will react different because no kit is equal to other like CPU neither, so you have to test and learn trying also EVENTUAL DRAM VOLTS, and remember the more you tight or go up in MHZ, CPU will ask for more food
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.5K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!