Yeah I don't think so. The 380x is at worst going to be a re-branded 290 on a smaller node. So equal or better than 290 performance at 180-190 watts sounds more likely.
They were, their leak was a Tomb Raider benchmark that showed the stock 780Ti had a slight advantage over the GTX 980 although I believe after patches the difference was reversed.
They were, their leak was a Tomb Raider benchmark that showed the stock 780Ti had a slight advantage over the GTX 980 although I believe after patches the difference was reversed.
I would buy this chart if it were a 390X, but not a 380X. Unless they have done away with the 290/290X naming scheme, and just went with 390X (290X replacement) and 380X (290 replacement).
Can't be 390X unless 490X comes after it because of the power consumption. If this is true its looking good for AMD. If anything this is just to make people hold up on buying new GPUs.
it's about on par with an overclocked 980 (1400 core it seems). Not too outrageous if 1) AMD is making those big changes to GCN that were rumored a while ago 2) HBM has a noticeable impact on performance.
If HBM is used, there's the added bonus of HBM using less power than GDDR5, which adds to the efficiency.
It's happened a lot in the past between these two.
Anyway, I could see this being an interim flagship for AMD until they get big Bermuda ready. If that were true, then I bet they release it at 500 dollars, not 300 dollars.
I'm reading this how every one is. 390x can't be only 15% faster then a mid range die from Nvidia. Just look at what 680->780ti did. 55% performance increase http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_780_Ti_Gaming/24.html. Now, i don't know how faster the gm200 will be but there is a sure thing it's not only 15% faster.
If AMD release their highest end card and it's only 15% faster then a 980 this means they will have their 390x competing with a card(gm200) that would be well over 20% faster (and it will be competing much as soon as the 390x get released since maxwell is already ready). Heck, their old 290x is trading blows with the 980 as of right now in quite a few game and it's 13 months old, do you think new high end gen cards will be only 15% faster then that? Absurd. If the stacked VRAM is true bandwith will be immense on those cards too, so no bottleneck for high res.
That is all speculation ofc, who knows if it's even real but if their 390x is that fast/slow well it's doom and gloom for amd because their market share will shrink to no end after the gm200 release.
Looks good, if it is the successor to the 280X and competes against the GTX 970/980. If it is true I can imagine how fast the 390X would be.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.2K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!