Overclock.net banner

[GameGPU] Dying Light Benchmarks

39K views 334 replies 133 participants last post by  xenophobe 
#1 ·
#6 ·
#7 ·
So the game only uses 2 cores?
 
#8 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZealotKi11er View Post

So the game only uses 2 cores?
Judging by the performance it only uses one,but even then the benches do not make any sense. Eg the i5 can't be possibly losing by 10% to the i3 because if turbos higher,whiler the 5960X is running away from the rest (and there is no justification for that). Not to mention the i3-2100 is to i5-2500k what the i3-4330 is to i5-4670k and yet in this case the i5 beats it by 20%. How a sandy core at 3.5GHz handily beats a sandy core at 3.1 but a haswell core at 3.6 loses to a haswell core at 3.5, only gamegpu.ru can tell. It is also ridiculous that in their test the FX-4300 is matching the FX-9370.
 
#9 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuivamaa View Post

Judging by the performance it only uses one,but even then the benches do not make any sense. Eg the i5 can't be possibly losing by 10% to the i3 because if turbos higher,whiler the 5960X is running away from the rest (and there is no justification for that). Not to mention the i3-2100 is to i5-2500k what the i3-4330 is to i5-4670k and yet in this case the i5 beats it by 20%. How a sandy core at 3.5GHz handily beats a sandy core at 3.1 but a haswell core at 3.6 loses to a haswell core at 3.5, only gamegpu.ru can tell. It is also ridiculous that in their test the FX-4300 is matching the FX-9370.
The funny thing about that site is that 5960X wins in every game.
 
#11 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by maarten12100 View Post

CF R9 290X scores lower than a single one. Who coded this game...
Doesn't matter though as my friends say it is "freaking awsome"
My guess is CF is gimped/disabled.
 
#12 ·
Did AMD even release drivers for this game? I know the newest Nvidia drivers already had the profile for this game for about a week before it came out, so this an Nvidia sponsored title?.... Not the first time we've seen one team have an advantage before another could make profile for a game.

Dat core usage doe.
exclamation.gif
 
#13 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZealotKi11er View Post

The funny thing about that site is that 5960X wins in every game.
Yeah I know ,other sites are less enthusiastic about it.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i7-5960x-haswell-e-cpu,3918-6.html

Tom's found out that 5960X can't even get a commanding lead over a 3970X in their tested games,and I trust angelini more than gamegpu.ru. That said, from videos that I see online, the game is in need of some serious optimization. I do not doubt that intel is doing much better here. Also CFX is obviously broken. Is this nvidia sponsored?
 
#16 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by fragamemnon View Post

These graphs are ridiculous. Especially the CPU comparison.
Also, why no Crossfire configurations? I'd be interested in them.

Oh, wait. That's right. It doesn't even have a CF profile so apparently this is broken. I like new games.
There is a R9 295x2 on the list
 
#18 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by maarten12100 View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by fragamemnon View Post

These graphs are ridiculous. Especially the CPU comparison.
Also, why no Crossfire configurations? I'd be interested in them.

Oh, wait. That's right. It doesn't even have a CF profile so apparently this is broken. I like new games.
There is a R9 295x2 on the list
Exactly what I said. I was being sarcastic, I saw the 295x2.

Another half-assed product that had to meet a release date deadline.
frown.gif


Edit: or at least that is what I wish to believe. Seeing how erratic the benchmarks are, I really hope devs lacked time at their disposal.
 
#19 ·
2600k destroyed by an i3........huh
 
#26 ·
The CPU using 1 core 99% is a big problem.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top