If there's something I'm a fan of, it's multi-GPU setups. From the very first time I could run video cards in tandem with 3DFX and its SLI technology, I've always strived for what Agent Smith in The Matrix Reloaded said when he was fighting Neo; "more... more, more more".
It was only a week or so ago that AMD released its new Radeon R9 Fury X video card that features the super-fast High Bandwidth Memory. While we were fairly impressed with the card, the huge cooler and lack of performance that I thought HBM would deliver, the card fell short of greatness. But it looks like the Fury X is a much better card when thrown into a multi-GPU situation than it is on its own.
Finally some direct crossfire comparisons with a Titan X and GTX 980Ti SLI! AS AMD's focus on 4k is apparent you can really see the R9 FURY X shine in 4K Crossfire going neck and neck with Nvidia's offering.
I'd also like to see some more Nvidia focused titles such as Project Cars and the Witcher 3.
They have always had better scaling than nvidia though right. So single solution atm nvidia, multiple cards amd. Though trying to cram two aios, or three if you include the cpu aio is going to get messy quick.
They have always had better scaling than nvidia though right. So single solution atm nvidia, multiple cards amd. Though trying to cram two aios, or three if you include the cpu aio is going to get messy quick.
A lot of cases have space for 4 AIO. Something like Define S, Define R5, NZXT cases etc. These cases are like $100. Nothing to worry about with 2-3 cards.
I think it matters but not as much as you think. Maybe 2-5% better performance?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugalumps
They have always had better scaling than nvidia though right. So single solution atm nvidia, multiple cards amd. Though trying to cram two aios, or three if you include the cpu aio is going to get messy quick.
Anyways this whole 4K thing...why didn't they include HDMI 2.0 and again with this whole 4K thing, has the market gotten that big that they ignored the lower resolutions?
Anyways this whole 4K thing...why didn't they include HDMI 2.0 and again with this whole 4K thing, has the market gotten that big that they ignored the lower resolutions?
why do people still run benchmarks on 3 year old games. Nobody plays those anymore, they're old. I know it's for the sake of banchmarks and numbers but seriously people who find themselves on the verge on upgrading to play the latest game could use a benchmark of those games. BF4, Metro LL, Bioshock - I personally liked each of them but I really do not wanna go back.
why do people still run benchmarks on 3 year old games. Nobody plays those anymore, they're old. I know it's for the sake of banchmarks and numbers but seriously people who find themselves on the verge on upgrading to play the latest game could use a benchmark of those games. BF4, Metro LL, Bioshock - I personally liked each of them but I really do not wanna go back.
Why are people acting like Windows 10 is the savior of AMD hardware? Software from a 3rd party shouldn't be the savior to your hardware as a manufacturer. It isn't O.K.
Sure, we all will take any free software given performance increase, but it shouldn't be "I need Windows 10 to keep up with your card running Windows 7".
Because older is just better! See, they both end in "er", so that is proof!
Because Nvidia won't see gains either?
Why are people acting like Windows 10 is the savior of AMD hardware? Software from a 3rd party shouldn't be the savior to your hardware as a manufacturer. It isn't O.K.
Sure, we all will take any free software given performance increase, but it shouldn't be "I need Windows 10 to keep up with your card running Windows 7".
Again, Windows 10 isn't going to bring something to the table that AMD gets to use to their benefit exclusively. Yet people keep acting like Windows 10 will be amazing for AMD, but not for Nvidia.
Again, Windows 10 isn't going to bring something to the table that AMD gets to use to their benefit exclusively. Yet people keep acting like Windows 10 will be amazing for AMD, but not for Nvidia.
Better drivers.Diretcx 12 driver will be better on amd side than the current DX11 given they want to push the lastest where they CPU are fine and the GPU have (slighly)better performance
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.2K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!