Originally Posted by discoprince
Originally Posted by Nivity
You really like defending Steelseries do ya
And I already compared it to Kana v2 which have better sensor, better clicks but worse shape.
And again, r0ach praised the 800dpi step at kana v2, and I trust his OCD about cursor quality over yours any day of the week
not really a steelseries fan boy except for their shapes. i only ever owned a vanilla sensei ($90 when i bought it and died on me 2 months later), sensei RAW and a kana v2.
also he never praised it, he said the only reason he used it was because of the shape. the firmware only made the 3090 somewhat bearable for him. thats all.
this thing has a very similar shape, im sure he wouldn't mind using it either.
lol, salty much?
He kinda did.
And others agree that the 800dpi step was good after the update as well.
And even so it is leaps above the Rival 100 1000dpi step.
If you cannot feel what is wrong with the 1000dpi step on Rival 100 then there is not much to talk about
You are in denial or just cannot feel it unlike other people here can, and if so well then there is not much to talk about really
And nah, to old to be salty, fact is enough for me as I said above, other mice at same price with way better 800-1000dpi step. Defend the mouse all you want, hard to deny pure facts
But anyway, I'll leave this now because no use discussing it further, plenty of people reported that the 1000dpi step is bad, I feel it, they feel it, you seem to think it's "good enough for the price" which is kinda dumb Edited by Nivity - 10/24/15 at 7:34am