Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › Graphics Cards - General › Fury X is now just as fast as GTX 980Ti in 1080p/1440p and faster in 4K
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Fury X is now just as fast as GTX 980Ti in 1080p/1440p and faster in 4K - Page 10

post #91 of 165
I experience a lot of stuttering with my 980 ti, stock overclock, drivers old vs new

with my 290x gta v felt so smooth


I am thinking of amd
Turcoman Rig
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i9 7920x Rampage VI  GTX 1080 Corsair 3000 c15 32gb 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Western Digital Blue Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 Samsung 830 128 Sony Blu Ray 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Corsair h110 8+7+XP BenQ Xl2420T razer blackwidow ultimate stealth 2013 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair AX1200W Corsair 900D Razer Mamba elite 2012 steelseries QcK+ heavy 
AudioOther
2.1 Speakers Nvidia 3D Vision 2 Kit 
  hide details  
Reply
Turcoman Rig
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i9 7920x Rampage VI  GTX 1080 Corsair 3000 c15 32gb 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Western Digital Blue Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 Samsung 830 128 Sony Blu Ray 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Corsair h110 8+7+XP BenQ Xl2420T razer blackwidow ultimate stealth 2013 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair AX1200W Corsair 900D Razer Mamba elite 2012 steelseries QcK+ heavy 
AudioOther
2.1 Speakers Nvidia 3D Vision 2 Kit 
  hide details  
Reply
post #92 of 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by MerkageTurk View Post

I experience a lot of stuttering with my 980 ti, stock overclock, drivers old vs new

with my 290x gta v felt so smooth


I am thinking of amd
Is that with a clean install of windows? With my 980 I don't get a hint of stutter.
Vsync?
Use RTSS and AB to show your frametimings. If they are going crazy with a clean install, it may be a bad card.
Hot n Bothered
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 4690k Asus Sabertooth Z97 MkII 2 EVGA GTX 980 FTW PNY 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Kingston 2x Kingston v300 120gb RAID 0 WD Blue ASUS 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
Cooler Master 212 Evo Windows 7 HP w2408h NZXT HALE82 V2 
CaseOther
Corsair 450D I have pretty lights.  
  hide details  
Reply
Hot n Bothered
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 4690k Asus Sabertooth Z97 MkII 2 EVGA GTX 980 FTW PNY 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Kingston 2x Kingston v300 120gb RAID 0 WD Blue ASUS 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
Cooler Master 212 Evo Windows 7 HP w2408h NZXT HALE82 V2 
CaseOther
Corsair 450D I have pretty lights.  
  hide details  
Reply
post #93 of 165
Clean install twice, tried everything from stock, no msi burner or any other programs.

CPU even stock to no avail

290x was super smooth i was amazed to be honest.
Turcoman Rig
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i9 7920x Rampage VI  GTX 1080 Corsair 3000 c15 32gb 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Western Digital Blue Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 Samsung 830 128 Sony Blu Ray 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Corsair h110 8+7+XP BenQ Xl2420T razer blackwidow ultimate stealth 2013 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair AX1200W Corsair 900D Razer Mamba elite 2012 steelseries QcK+ heavy 
AudioOther
2.1 Speakers Nvidia 3D Vision 2 Kit 
  hide details  
Reply
Turcoman Rig
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i9 7920x Rampage VI  GTX 1080 Corsair 3000 c15 32gb 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Western Digital Blue Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 Samsung 830 128 Sony Blu Ray 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Corsair h110 8+7+XP BenQ Xl2420T razer blackwidow ultimate stealth 2013 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair AX1200W Corsair 900D Razer Mamba elite 2012 steelseries QcK+ heavy 
AudioOther
2.1 Speakers Nvidia 3D Vision 2 Kit 
  hide details  
Reply
post #94 of 165
I tell you I saw GTA5 on ASUS R9-390X 8GB Strix that's like reality.
Better AMD to prepare lot of R9-390X because people will choose that cards and for 12 months when they become cheaper.
Special for CF. With 8GB Video memory they don't need to worry for limited video memory.
Now with 450$ per card price for CF is close to TITAN X. And TITAN X is almost as R9-390X CF and single card and 12GB Video Memory and support PhysX. AMD without even lower price will continue to go in deeper problems. They need to start to offer cards with shocking price, low and to back old customers. 30% of NVIDIA customers now are ex Radeon fans who start with Radeon and who bought only Radeon years before NVIDIA become so popular and better option.
How Radeon to sell one card with pump whine, without PhysX, weaker than GTX980Ti with less video memory for same price.
If they want to sell bigger percent, close to NVIDIA, not more than NVIDIA, AMD need stronger mid and stronger high segment for at least 7-8% where no one can explain that as NVIDIA win and for cheaper price. Because sooner or later every Radeon owner will go on NVIDIA site to download PhysX only to start game, sooner or later will figure out that for some buggs only NVIDIA customers with Control Panel or NVIDIA Inspector have solution. Some old game without AA could borrow profile from other game with AA, everything only on GeForce and that reflect on one percent of people next time to buy GeForce. Soon AMD customers will stay only people who lose confidence in GeForce and who had problems with GeForce and people who can't afford GeForce. With such profile of customers no one can stay on market long time.
I looked some games on Radeon cards and that's far better than HD6970. HD7970 ...much less stuttering.
GeForce image quality is inferior to Radeon sharpness, details on long distance, but superior in effects, tessellation, PhysX, 3D Vision, TXAA.

I swear NVIDIA probably optimized their hardware graphic processor with drivers not to present 10% of details and cover that with blur. Because many customers can't notice such small difference and with 10% lower details and resolution they could get smoother gameplay. Maybe I didn't explain that on best way but they done something similar and because of that even fonts and text is sharper on Radeon cards before someone start game.
Edited by Vlada011 - 11/4/15 at 3:59pm
post #95 of 165
why do you care about physx so much?
post #96 of 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by semitope View Post

why do you care about physx so much?

I can't explain that... for me is that similar like Radeon can't show one color example.
Simply cripple for one important option. PhysX is not only option in game to hair look better or water or similar thing...
They could improve that so far and games to become funny on Radeon compare to GeForce only if they want.
Imagine you have Radeon and near your driver you need to download PhysX from NVIDIA site only to stay installed because game will not start without that.
For gamers who lot pay attention on details and play one game longer time to enjoy in details that's very important and look very bad for Radeon owners and number of Radeon owners is prove for that.

From other side NVIDIA done some tricky things with drivers or during design graphic processor and on their chip resolution and details will look 10% lower than on Radeon.
No other explanation for bunch of people who notice that and special when someone Radeon owners decide to invest more money for premium NVIDIA and suddenly he recognize lower image quality than on 300-400$ cheaper Radeon. Immediately after Windows Boot people recognize difference fonts are not sharp and clear, more blur,...
post #97 of 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlada011 View Post

Fury X is good but it's not faster than GTX980Ti. And I don't know how AMD think to recover if they sell weaker cards without PhysX for same money as NVIDIA.
And even GeForce GTX980Ti have advantage because better overclocking.
Fury X should cost 500$. Special because every normal person will remove stock pump and install waterblock and that's +100/110$ more.
Fury X with waterblock worth as reference GTX980Ti.

I looked yesterday video clips ASUS R9-390X 8GB GTA5 gameplay and picture is better than on GeForce cards.
Look almost as reality.
I have noticed in alot of games you can tell AMD has the better image quality many others have noticed this also and usually it is on Nvidia gameworks titles this kind of throws a redflag as of why this is star wars battlefront there was a few of the Fury / fury X / 390x vs GTX 980 TI and well the image quality was better on the AMD cards I have noticed this alot maybe Nvidia are turning down image quality to get better performance I don't know but it seems this way.

I have noticed AMD cards to have a better image quality for past few gens than Nivida I do not know why even if run identical settings the AMD setups are crisper and more vibrant along with seem to have all around better color representation.

here is a good thread on just this http://www.overclock.net/t/1462291/amd-vs-nvidia-image-quality
Edited by rickcooperjr - 11/4/15 at 5:58pm
My System
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel I7 5820k 4.6ghz core 4.3ghz CPU cache 1.345v asus sabertooth X99 sold R9 290x's am currently running a R9 280A X... 16gb of ddr4 corsair vengeance LPX 3200mhz 1t 1... 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
M.2 Toshiba OCZ RD400 512gb ASUS DVD rw  liquid cooled cpu and gpu's windows 10 pro 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
3 x 32lcd/led 2560x1600 wolfking timberwolf EVGA supernova 1300w G2  Thermaltake core X9 
MouseMouse PadOther
steel series wow cataclysm 14button programable  wolfking sniper Intel PRO PT dual port PCIe server NIC 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel I7 5820k 4.6ghz core 4.3ghz CPU cache 1.345v asus sabertooth X99 sold R9 290x's am currently running a R9 280A X... 16gb of ddr4 corsair vengeance LPX 3200mhz 1t 1... 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
M.2 Toshiba OCZ RD400 512gb ASUS DVD rw  liquid cooled cpu and gpu's windows 10 pro 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
3 x 32lcd/led 2560x1600 wolfking timberwolf EVGA supernova 1300w G2  Thermaltake core X9 
MouseMouse PadOther
steel series wow cataclysm 14button programable  wolfking sniper Intel PRO PT dual port PCIe server NIC 
  hide details  
Reply
post #98 of 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by MerkageTurk View Post

I experience a lot of stuttering with my 980 ti, stock overclock, drivers old vs new

with my 290x gta v felt so smooth


I am thinking of amd


You must have some kind of a problem. I'm playing gtav 2560x1440 @65 to 75 FPS

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickcooperjr View Post

I have noticed in alot of games you can tell AMD has the better image quality many others have noticed this also and usually it is on Nvidia gameworks titles this kind of throws a redflag as of why this is star wars battlefront there was a few of the Fury / fury X / 390x vs GTX 980 TI and well the image quality was better on the AMD cards I have noticed this alot maybe Nvidia are turning down image quality to get better performance I don't know but it seems this way.

I have noticed AMD cards to have a better image quality for past few gens than Nivida I do not know why even if run identical settings the AMD setups are crisper and more vibrant along with seem to have all around better color representation.

here is a good thread on just this http://www.overclock.net/t/1462291/amd-vs-nvidia-image-quality



Actually its Nvidia looks much better than amd, a lot. This is 290x at 2560x1440 looks bad, looks real bad. Look at the background pop up, like an xbox. Left is AMD. Right is Nvidia same 2560@1440 IMHO Nvidia 10x better.

Edited by DrFPS - 11/4/15 at 6:23pm
MyCleanPC
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4770k ASUS MAXIMUS VI EVGA master blaster Corsair Vengence  
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
OCZ SSD raid0 samsung Win 7 Samsung 
PowerCase
Enermax rev 1050 Stacker 832 
  hide details  
Reply
MyCleanPC
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4770k ASUS MAXIMUS VI EVGA master blaster Corsair Vengence  
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
OCZ SSD raid0 samsung Win 7 Samsung 
PowerCase
Enermax rev 1050 Stacker 832 
  hide details  
Reply
post #99 of 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by MerkageTurk View Post

I experience a lot of stuttering with my 980 ti, stock overclock, drivers old vs new

with my 290x gta v felt so smooth


I am thinking of amd

No.
post #100 of 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrFPS View Post

You must have some kind of a problem. I'm playing gtav 2560x1440 @65 to 75 FPS
Actually its Nvidia looks much better than amd, a lot. This is 290x at 2560x1440 looks bad, looks real bad. Look at the background pop up, like an xbox. Left is AMD. Right is Nvidia same 2560@1440 IMHO Nvidia 10x better. Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

not really how you compare image quality.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Graphics Cards - General
Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › Graphics Cards - General › Fury X is now just as fast as GTX 980Ti in 1080p/1440p and faster in 4K