Originally Posted by Nizzen
3 years from store yes.
It does not look like the latency is too big on the raid-0. Does it?
61,5 MB/s 4k random read @ QD=1 is faster than the most ssd's...
You're using a synthetic benchmark. It doesn't reflect real world usage.
here's tom's hardware review on using 950 Pros in RAID 0:
"After poring over our results, we figured out why a single drive's latency is better than two 950 Pros in RAID 0. In a striped configuration, the array uses Microsoft’s RAID driver and not Samsung’s custom NVMe software. Windows sees the array as an Intel chipset volume. It's possible that Intel might be working on a custom RAID 0 driver, but we aren't counting on it. Fortunately, although Samsung's driver enables lower latency, we doubt anyone will "feel" the difference.
Increasing performance through RAID 0 no longer has the same shine it once had. NVMe SSDs are fast enough to satisfy the most demanding user needs. We've hit a point where RAID 0 run off of a chipset gives diminishing returns."