Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [PCGHW]Fallout 4 in art test with benchmarks for release
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[PCGHW]Fallout 4 in art test with benchmarks for release - Page 14

post #131 of 701
Quote:
Originally Posted by iLeakStuff View Post

lol tongue.gif

So it's the driver overhead.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Semel View Post

Anyone surprised? Lol Nvidia is using the same lame tessellation trick again.. god rays low vs ultra-> no difference or 1% difference visually wise. And a HUGE performance hit.

They have been pushing useless levels of tessellation on anything they could apply it to for ages.

What a frigging disgrace.

Then just set it low. What's the big deal?
post #132 of 701
imo I think some of the settings are broken when you consider a budget PC destroys consoles at the default HIGH settings.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iipDWbd6HNg < here's what I'm talking about. i3 + 750 ti stock settings

Fallout 4 runs on a mix of Low, Medium and a bit of High settings on consoles.
post #133 of 701
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrSmoke View Post

Its not Nvidia's fault they have the money to optimize their drivers before AMD does.

 

How About Async Compute? do you really want AMD to Exploit it to beat Nvidia?

post #134 of 701
This thread should be deleted. Disagree with someone? YOU'RE A FANBOY! !11!11!11eleven!!!

Seriously. This is nonsense.

OCN is NOT mature enough to handle this discussion. At all.
Biggus D.
(18 items)
 
Leo Laporte
(13 items)
 
Shooter McGavin
(24 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom II X6 Thuban 1090T @ 4GHz Asus Crosshair IV Formula 2x5870 in CrossfireX 2x4GB OCZ GOLD 1333MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x1TB Samsung Spinpoint, 2x1TB Seagate Barracuda Samsung Super Multi + Samsung BluRay LS Windows 7 Ultimate x64 2 x Samsung 2494SW 24'' 16:9 1080p 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Arctosa Silver Silverstone Strider ST-1000 Coolermaster HAF X Steelseries Kinzu 
Mouse Pad
Steelseries 11.5x12.2 Surface 
  hide details  
Reply
Biggus D.
(18 items)
 
Leo Laporte
(13 items)
 
Shooter McGavin
(24 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom II X6 Thuban 1090T @ 4GHz Asus Crosshair IV Formula 2x5870 in CrossfireX 2x4GB OCZ GOLD 1333MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x1TB Samsung Spinpoint, 2x1TB Seagate Barracuda Samsung Super Multi + Samsung BluRay LS Windows 7 Ultimate x64 2 x Samsung 2494SW 24'' 16:9 1080p 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Arctosa Silver Silverstone Strider ST-1000 Coolermaster HAF X Steelseries Kinzu 
Mouse Pad
Steelseries 11.5x12.2 Surface 
  hide details  
Reply
post #135 of 701
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semel View Post

Anyone surprised? Lol Nvidia is using the same lame tessellation trick again.. god rays low vs ultra-> no difference or 1% difference visually wise. And a HUGE performance hit.

They have been pushing useless levels of tessellation on anything they could apply it to for ages.

What a frigging disgrace.

If tessellation was the only reason wouldn't Kepler show terrible performance too? Kepler has very bad tessellation performance compared to Maxwell.

I don't understand this hate for options which should be turned down or off for now. Why is it a disgrace to simply run god rays on low? You don't like the quality/performance of the high and ultra options so they should be removed?!? mad.gif

Don't we want the engine to give us quality options that when all the way up run a bit too slow on current hardware? I know I do, sure you don't want to run ultra god rays now but when Arctic Islands or Pascal is out it would be great to have quality improving options available, even if they don't offer a lot of extra quality. My opinion is that ultra everything should not run well on current hardware. I hate it when games don't implement the very high quality options in the interest of making it run with everything all the way up on anything. It probably does make people feel good when they can run it with everything all the way up on a potato but that means those with better hardware don't have any room for improvement.

This option runs bad on AMD so it should be removed. rolleyes.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xuper View Post

How About Async Compute? do you really want AMD to Exploit it to beat Nvidia?

YES! Absolutely, not "to beat Nvidia" but if it gives any extra quality then they better try as hard as they can to implement it as much as possible. If this also gives them an advantage in some reviews more power to them. I seriously do not want developers to avoid implementing things because they don't run well on a specific piece of current hardware. I will probably want to run some current games on my new computer in 2022.
Edited by Asmodian - 11/9/15 at 1:44pm
Desktop
(19 items)
 
RAID
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i9-7900X @ 4.7GHz Asus ROG Rampage VI Apex Titan X (Pascal) @ 2.05GHz 32GB DDR4 4000-17-17-17-37 CR1 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
480GB - Intel Optane 900P 2TB - Samsung 960 Pro EK Monoblock + GPU + 560 Rad Windows 10 Pro x64 
MonitorMonitorMonitorKeyboard
Acer XB270HU bprz HTC Vive LG OLED55C7P Logitech G810 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Seasonic PRIME 1200 Platinum Old Marble Slab Logitech G900 Logitech G440 
AudioAudioOther
Sennheiser HD 600 Creative SoundBlasterX AE-5 Mellanox ConnectX-3 MCX312A-XCBT 10 GbE Adapter 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-5960X @ 4.2GHz Asus Rampage 5 Extreme Nvidia GeForce GT 545 32GB DDR4 (2400-12-12-12-28-1T) 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 512GB HGST NAS 4TB x8 - 21.8TB RAID6 Western Digital Black 4TB Samsung SH-S183L 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Noctua NH-D15 Windows 10 Pro Asus VG278H WASD "CODE" Keyboard 
PowerCaseMouseOther
SeaSonic Platinum-1000 DIYPC Alpha-GT3 Logitech G700s Mellanox ConnectX-3 MCX312A-XCBT 10 GbE Adapter 
Other
Adaptec RAID 71605 
  hide details  
Reply
Desktop
(19 items)
 
RAID
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i9-7900X @ 4.7GHz Asus ROG Rampage VI Apex Titan X (Pascal) @ 2.05GHz 32GB DDR4 4000-17-17-17-37 CR1 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
480GB - Intel Optane 900P 2TB - Samsung 960 Pro EK Monoblock + GPU + 560 Rad Windows 10 Pro x64 
MonitorMonitorMonitorKeyboard
Acer XB270HU bprz HTC Vive LG OLED55C7P Logitech G810 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Seasonic PRIME 1200 Platinum Old Marble Slab Logitech G900 Logitech G440 
AudioAudioOther
Sennheiser HD 600 Creative SoundBlasterX AE-5 Mellanox ConnectX-3 MCX312A-XCBT 10 GbE Adapter 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-5960X @ 4.2GHz Asus Rampage 5 Extreme Nvidia GeForce GT 545 32GB DDR4 (2400-12-12-12-28-1T) 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 512GB HGST NAS 4TB x8 - 21.8TB RAID6 Western Digital Black 4TB Samsung SH-S183L 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Noctua NH-D15 Windows 10 Pro Asus VG278H WASD "CODE" Keyboard 
PowerCaseMouseOther
SeaSonic Platinum-1000 DIYPC Alpha-GT3 Logitech G700s Mellanox ConnectX-3 MCX312A-XCBT 10 GbE Adapter 
Other
Adaptec RAID 71605 
  hide details  
Reply
post #136 of 701
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raven Dizzle View Post

This thread should be deleted. Disagree with someone? YOU'RE A FANBOY! !11!11!11eleven!!!

Seriously. This is nonsense.

OCN is NOT mature enough to handle this discussion. At all.

The whole debate is dumb. Buy the card that performs well for the games you play /discussion. The fact that there are teams at all is idiotic.

Also day 1 drivers.

Also Bethesda game engine.

But the fanboys are hardly need an excuse now do they?
post #137 of 701
post #138 of 701

The way the 980/970 power ahead at lower resolutions points to driver overhead. So nothing new there.

But that screenshot at the end does look awfully dated.





Edited by Forceman - 11/9/15 at 2:33pm
post #139 of 701
****ty game /thread! biggrin.gif
System
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Ryzen 1700 Asus ROG STRIX B-350-F Gaming Zotac GTX 1080 AMP G.SKILL TridentZ RGB 2x8GB DDR4 3000MHZ 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOptical Drive
Samsung EVO 500GB SSD Seagate Barracuda 3TB LG WH14NS40 BD Rewriter Samsung SH-S223Q 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
AMD SPIRE Windows 10 x64 Enterprise Samsung UN43KU7500 43" Curved 4K LCD Motospeed Mechanical 
PowerCaseMouse
Antec HCP 1200 Watt CM HAF922 Sharkk 16K DPI Laser Mouse 
  hide details  
Reply
System
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Ryzen 1700 Asus ROG STRIX B-350-F Gaming Zotac GTX 1080 AMP G.SKILL TridentZ RGB 2x8GB DDR4 3000MHZ 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOptical Drive
Samsung EVO 500GB SSD Seagate Barracuda 3TB LG WH14NS40 BD Rewriter Samsung SH-S223Q 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
AMD SPIRE Windows 10 x64 Enterprise Samsung UN43KU7500 43" Curved 4K LCD Motospeed Mechanical 
PowerCaseMouse
Antec HCP 1200 Watt CM HAF922 Sharkk 16K DPI Laser Mouse 
  hide details  
Reply
post #140 of 701
lol at this game,980 Ti needed for 1080p maxed out. Godrays 10/10 totally worth it



144 hz brahs forget maxing it out lol
Edited by GoLDii3 - 11/9/15 at 2:37pm
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [PCGHW]Fallout 4 in art test with benchmarks for release