Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Software News › [Various] Fallout 4 PC GPU & CPU Benchmarks (Tenth Update)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Various] Fallout 4 PC GPU & CPU Benchmarks (Tenth Update)

post #1 of 217
Thread Starter 
Quote:















Conclusion:

Fallout 4 is an odd game. It doesn't look at all impressive – I mean, just look at the above screenshot. You can literally count the polygons in that fencepost – it's less than 40, for sure. The fence itself is a flat barrier with zero depth. The game, objectively, is dated in its visual presentation. That doesn't make the game bad – our review actually suggests otherwise – but it does make its graphics less impressive by modern standards. We'd expect performance to be stellar given this simplified aesthetic, but Fallout's huge view distances and shadow application take a lot of that away. For anyone trying to achieve a higher framerate than represented here, we'd suggest first lowering Shadow Distance, then tabbing down a few of the view distance settings by modest amounts.

Anyway, to play at 1080/ultra in a worst-case scenario, you'll want something like the $230 R9 380 (not present) or GTX 960 ($225). An R9 390X works well for 1440p and would be our go-to, short of opting for nVidia's GTX 980 at ~$500.

4K just isn't meant for single-GPU solutions at this time, especially not at max settings and view distances.

As for lower settings, anyone comfortable compromising “Ultra” for “Medium” can grab the GTX 950 for a solid 60FPS experience. Users of “Low” settings can make a 750 Ti work in a pinch, but the R9 270X handles itself excellently. The 270X is now deprecated, but it has effectively been replaced with the R7 370.

Source: http://www.gamersnexus.net/game-bench/2177-fallout-4-pc-video-card-fps-benchmark-all-resolutions


Going to make this a various thread because there are more sources available (and I will update as even more become available):

Quote:
Budget Graphics: GTX 750 Ti vs R7 360 Frame-Rate Test



Fallout 4 PC: GTX 950/ GTX 960 vs R9 380/ R7 370



1080p60 Ultra: GTX 970 vs R9 390 Frame-Rate Test



4K/1440p: GTX 980 Ti vs R9 Fury X





Source 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37CzgecyvTs
Source 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imcj_BxGqD4
Source 4: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15wOp7_dD8E
Source 5: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cng9qm62k0s


GameGPU.ru Benches are in:
Quote:














Source 6: http://gamegpu.ru/rpg/rollevye/fallout-4-test-gpu.html


Looks like Guru3D is also up with their performance review:

Quote:








Source 7: http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/fallout_4_pc_graphics_performance_benchmark_review,7.html


Tom's has a performance review up, but it isn't a traditional review. Seems to be be comparing different configurations:

Quote:




Source 8: http://www.tomshardware.com/news/fallout-4-pc-benchmarks-vsync,30527.html


Another video Performance review:

Quote:


Claims his 4.9GHz 6600k was becoming a bottleneck: https://youtu.be/F5ojEukUj94?t=371


Source 9: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ojEukUj94


OC3D's Benchmarks are up (Before AMD Updated Drivers):

Quote:
1080p, 1440p and 4K testing at Ultra Settings





Low, Medium, High and Ultra Benchmarks at 4K





Godrays - On vs Off Ultra benchmarks



After AMD Updated Drivers:
Quote:
1080p, 1440p and 4K testing at Ultra Settings with Updated Drivers



Fury X Updated Driver comparison:



Godrays - On vs Off Ultra benchmarks



Source 10: http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/fallout_4_-_amd_vs_nvidia_performance_review/10


HardOCP's performance review is up:
Quote:
Maximum Game Settings "Ultra" Godrays



Ultra Game Settings "High" Godrays



Ultra Game Settings "High" Godrays - TAA (instead of FXAA)



Maximum Game Settings "Ultra" Godrays



Ultra Game Settings "High" Godrays



Ultra Game Settings "High" Godrays - TAA



Godrays Performance









AA Performance




Source 11: http://www.hardocp.com/article/2015/11/11/fallout_4_performance_image_quality_preview/8

Techspot has their video card testing of Fallout 4 up. Also includes some CPU clockspeed and memory performance testing:
Quote:
1080p



1440p



4K




Some clock speed CPU testing:




Memory frequency testing:






67% increase in minimum frame rate for the Core i7-4770K.


Source 12: http://www.techspot.com/review/1089-fallout-4-benchmarks/


ComputerBase.De has their CPU and GPU benchmarks of the Game available:

Quote:
AA Performance:



Godrays Performance:



1080p:



1440p:



4K:



CPU Scaling:



Source 13: http://www.computerbase.de/2015-11/fallout-4-benchmarks/
Translated Source 13


Digital Storm's video Benchmarks of the Game @ 1080p, 1440p, and 4K:

Quote:


Source 14: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9MUAFgR11c


Over at WCCFTech they have more benchmarks available, so if you were looking to see more AMD cards tested that's exactly what WCCFTech provided:
Quote:
1440p All Cards



1080p & 1440p Fury



1080p & 1440p Nano



1080p & 1440p 290X



1080p & 1440p 370



1080p & 1440p GTX Titan X



1080p & 1440p GTX 970




1080p & 1440p GTX 960



VRAM and System Memory Consumption Test (Godrays Ultra and Off):


Source 15: http://wccftech.com/fallout-4-pc-performance-analysis-gameworks/2/


Found someone who is benching the game at 3440x1440 on a single 980 Ti:

Quote:

Source 16: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APbMOnZZFcc
Source 17: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hnAnXFMvbo
Edited by BiG StroOnZ - 11/17/15 at 10:40pm
post #2 of 217
Initial gameplay .. Pass ...uninstall. Hate rpg type but atleast witcher 3 graphics were out of the world that kept the immersion. May try this again when i get a project middle of nowhere with no wifi/internet during the nights..
Dream
(22 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel 4790k MAXIMUS VI EXTREME GTX Titan X GTX Titan X 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Corsair Dominator Platinum Corsair Neutron GTX Intel X25M Western Digital Black 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Western Digital Black Crucial MX100 Watercooled Windows 7 64bit Ultimate 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardCase
Dell u2913WM Asus ROG Swift PG278Q Razer Blackwidow Chroma Silverstone Temjin 11 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Logitech G502 Logitech G440 Creative Zx Senheiser G4me Zero 
AudioOther
Edifier S730D Asus AC87U 
  hide details  
Reply
Dream
(22 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel 4790k MAXIMUS VI EXTREME GTX Titan X GTX Titan X 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Corsair Dominator Platinum Corsair Neutron GTX Intel X25M Western Digital Black 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Western Digital Black Crucial MX100 Watercooled Windows 7 64bit Ultimate 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardCase
Dell u2913WM Asus ROG Swift PG278Q Razer Blackwidow Chroma Silverstone Temjin 11 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Logitech G502 Logitech G440 Creative Zx Senheiser G4me Zero 
AudioOther
Edifier S730D Asus AC87U 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 217
Just played this for about 20 min. Hot damn, the graphics are bad. I mean, good lord! rolleyes.gif I don't even....I just....I mean, it's not even art style or direction....It's just bad!
Is it too much to ask for some MODERN graphics and not something that looks like it's from 2008. It doesn't have to be like Crysis 3 or whatever just something modern....rolleyes.gif Then again, consoles would cry because they can't run it (see console performance analisys rolleyes.gif)
post #4 of 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by cstkl1 View Post

Initial gameplay .. Pass ...uninstall. Hate rpg type but atleast witcher 3 graphics were out of the world that kept the immersion. May try this again when i get a project middle of nowhere with no wifi/internet during the nights..

Do I see horrible stuttering? Or is my GTX 980 TI stuttering watching your Titan X stutter?
post #5 of 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leopard2lx View Post

Just played this for about 20 min. Hot damn, the graphics are bad. I mean, good lord! rolleyes.gif I don't even....I just....I mean, it's not even art style or direction....It's just bad!
Is it too much to ask for some MODERN graphics and not something that looks like it's from 2008. It doesn't have to be like Crysis 3 or whatever just something modern....rolleyes.gif Then again, consoles would cry because they can't run it (see console performance analisys rolleyes.gif)

Meh your opinion. I think they are fine. if you went into a fallout game expecting great graphics, you have only yourself to blame. It has better graphics than its predecessors that's all I needed. Combat system is nice, and crafting content blows the lame witcher out of the water IMO.

No it does not look like its from 2008 that would be F3 and this is far ahead of that. I feel sorry for these people, sacrificing great gameplay because "derp grafiks not so good pa" Maybe im just an older gamer and grew up praising good content.
Upgrayedd
(8 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.95GHz 1.387v Asus Prime B350 Plus  RX480 XFX RS 1350/2200 Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 2933Mhz cas 14 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 Windows 10 pro x64 Viotek curved FHD 144Hz EVGA 750w 80 Bronze 
  hide details  
Reply
Upgrayedd
(8 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.95GHz 1.387v Asus Prime B350 Plus  RX480 XFX RS 1350/2200 Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 2933Mhz cas 14 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Samsung 950 Pro M.2 Windows 10 pro x64 Viotek curved FHD 144Hz EVGA 750w 80 Bronze 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by mouacyk View Post

Do I see horrible stuttering? Or is my GTX 980 TI stuttering watching your Titan X stutter?
No stutter. But was looking arnd quickly alot to check why the frame drop with gpu utilization by just moving a bit facing the samething.. Also maybe on that unzoom part to third party view.
Edited by cstkl1 - 11/10/15 at 12:38am
Dream
(22 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel 4790k MAXIMUS VI EXTREME GTX Titan X GTX Titan X 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Corsair Dominator Platinum Corsair Neutron GTX Intel X25M Western Digital Black 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Western Digital Black Crucial MX100 Watercooled Windows 7 64bit Ultimate 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardCase
Dell u2913WM Asus ROG Swift PG278Q Razer Blackwidow Chroma Silverstone Temjin 11 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Logitech G502 Logitech G440 Creative Zx Senheiser G4me Zero 
AudioOther
Edifier S730D Asus AC87U 
  hide details  
Reply
Dream
(22 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel 4790k MAXIMUS VI EXTREME GTX Titan X GTX Titan X 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Corsair Dominator Platinum Corsair Neutron GTX Intel X25M Western Digital Black 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Western Digital Black Crucial MX100 Watercooled Windows 7 64bit Ultimate 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardCase
Dell u2913WM Asus ROG Swift PG278Q Razer Blackwidow Chroma Silverstone Temjin 11 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Logitech G502 Logitech G440 Creative Zx Senheiser G4me Zero 
AudioOther
Edifier S730D Asus AC87U 
  hide details  
Reply
post #7 of 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimaggio1103 View Post

Meh your opinion. I think they are fine. if you went into a fallout game expecting great graphics, you have only yourself to blame. It has better graphics than its predecessors that's all I needed. Combat system is nice, and crafting content blows the lame witcher out of the water IMO.

No it does not look like its from 2008 that would be F3 and this is far ahead of that. I feel sorry for these people, sacrificing great gameplay because "derp grafiks not so good pa" Maybe im just an older gamer and grew up praising good content.

For a AAA title game, it's pathetic. rolleyes.gif

So many games out there that are able to achieve great looking graphics and gameplay. Like GTA V, Witcher 3, MGS:V.






Edited by 8-Ball - 11/9/15 at 10:05pm
post #8 of 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8-Ball View Post

For a AAA title game, it's pathetic. rolleyes.gif

So many games out there that are able to achieve great looking graphics and gameplay. Like GTA V, Witcher 3, MGS:V.
I think
Mgsv graphics = fallout 4.
Dream
(22 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel 4790k MAXIMUS VI EXTREME GTX Titan X GTX Titan X 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Corsair Dominator Platinum Corsair Neutron GTX Intel X25M Western Digital Black 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Western Digital Black Crucial MX100 Watercooled Windows 7 64bit Ultimate 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardCase
Dell u2913WM Asus ROG Swift PG278Q Razer Blackwidow Chroma Silverstone Temjin 11 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Logitech G502 Logitech G440 Creative Zx Senheiser G4me Zero 
AudioOther
Edifier S730D Asus AC87U 
  hide details  
Reply
Dream
(22 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel 4790k MAXIMUS VI EXTREME GTX Titan X GTX Titan X 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Corsair Dominator Platinum Corsair Neutron GTX Intel X25M Western Digital Black 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Western Digital Black Crucial MX100 Watercooled Windows 7 64bit Ultimate 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardCase
Dell u2913WM Asus ROG Swift PG278Q Razer Blackwidow Chroma Silverstone Temjin 11 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Logitech G502 Logitech G440 Creative Zx Senheiser G4me Zero 
AudioOther
Edifier S730D Asus AC87U 
  hide details  
Reply
post #9 of 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by cstkl1 View Post

I think
Mgsv graphics = fallout 4.

If you ask me, the character models look great compared to FO4.

post #10 of 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8-Ball View Post

If you ask me, the character models look great compared to FO4.

Graphically many ubi games with witcher 3 are in the insane region disregarding on how it runs.
Msgv.. Played only abit. Not my cup of tea. Got that free.
Dream
(22 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel 4790k MAXIMUS VI EXTREME GTX Titan X GTX Titan X 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Corsair Dominator Platinum Corsair Neutron GTX Intel X25M Western Digital Black 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Western Digital Black Crucial MX100 Watercooled Windows 7 64bit Ultimate 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardCase
Dell u2913WM Asus ROG Swift PG278Q Razer Blackwidow Chroma Silverstone Temjin 11 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Logitech G502 Logitech G440 Creative Zx Senheiser G4me Zero 
AudioOther
Edifier S730D Asus AC87U 
  hide details  
Reply
Dream
(22 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel 4790k MAXIMUS VI EXTREME GTX Titan X GTX Titan X 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Corsair Dominator Platinum Corsair Neutron GTX Intel X25M Western Digital Black 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Western Digital Black Crucial MX100 Watercooled Windows 7 64bit Ultimate 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardCase
Dell u2913WM Asus ROG Swift PG278Q Razer Blackwidow Chroma Silverstone Temjin 11 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Logitech G502 Logitech G440 Creative Zx Senheiser G4me Zero 
AudioOther
Edifier S730D Asus AC87U 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Software News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Software News › [Various] Fallout 4 PC GPU & CPU Benchmarks (Tenth Update)