Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Software News › [Various] Fallout 4 PC GPU & CPU Benchmarks (Tenth Update)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Various] Fallout 4 PC GPU & CPU Benchmarks (Tenth Update) - Page 6

post #51 of 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by PontiacGTX View Post

if it were a 2 core game the 2500k should be slower than an i3 4330..

The dudes at digital foundry call it "core aware" that sees many threads. Will have to take a look myself here.
Mastodon Ryzen
(12 items)
 
HP Z220
(8 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
R7 1800X Asus Crosshair VI Hero Sapphire RX Vega 64 reference Gskill TridentZ 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Pny SSD 240GB Crucial MX100 CM Nepton 280L Win 10 
MonitorPowerCaseMouse
Acer Predator XG270HU Freesync XFX 750W Pro HAF XM Logitech G502 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsCooling
i7 3770 HP Quadro K2000 HP 
OSPowerCaseMouse
Win 7  HP 400W HP CMT RAT 7 
  hide details  
Reply
Mastodon Ryzen
(12 items)
 
HP Z220
(8 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
R7 1800X Asus Crosshair VI Hero Sapphire RX Vega 64 reference Gskill TridentZ 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Pny SSD 240GB Crucial MX100 CM Nepton 280L Win 10 
MonitorPowerCaseMouse
Acer Predator XG270HU Freesync XFX 750W Pro HAF XM Logitech G502 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsCooling
i7 3770 HP Quadro K2000 HP 
OSPowerCaseMouse
Win 7  HP 400W HP CMT RAT 7 
  hide details  
Reply
post #52 of 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by OC'ing Noob View Post

We live in an era where a lot of people just like complain about anything and everything regardless of how little merit there is. The anonymity of the internet just makes it all the more easier for people to mouth off without thought. Personally, I am all for zero anonymity, where you register your real identity upon setting up your internet. It would cut down on a lot of stupidity and BS.

No we live in an era were people have very low standards because they consistently settle for mediocrity. No reasonable person is expecting the game to look like Crysis 3 but for god sakes graphics technology has made a big leap since Fallout 3. This game appears to be 2 generations behind. It's about finding that happy medium between gameplay and graphics and Fallout 4 fails hard on the latter. I could understand if this game was developed by a smaller developer but considering this is a massive AAA title from a large developer based on a hugely successful franchise, I find it unacceptable to be charging customers a premium price for a game worth half of that.

As usual wait six months for the community to complete the leg work Bethesda refuses to do and then pick the game up for $20
Edited by Nightingale - 11/10/15 at 1:48pm
My System
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 6700k@ 4.8Ghz Asus Maximus viii Hero Asus GTX 1080 Strix  GSkill Trident Z 3200 14-14-14 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
SanDisk Extreme Pro + 850 EVO 500GB EK Supremacy Nickel  WIN 7 x64 ASUS ROG PG279Q 27" 2560X1440 Gsync  
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
IBM Model M Corsair HX850 Corsair Obsidian 800D SteelSeries Rival 300 
Mouse PadAudio
PURE TRACK TALNET Titanium HD + Asus STX 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 6700k@ 4.8Ghz Asus Maximus viii Hero Asus GTX 1080 Strix  GSkill Trident Z 3200 14-14-14 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
SanDisk Extreme Pro + 850 EVO 500GB EK Supremacy Nickel  WIN 7 x64 ASUS ROG PG279Q 27" 2560X1440 Gsync  
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
IBM Model M Corsair HX850 Corsair Obsidian 800D SteelSeries Rival 300 
Mouse PadAudio
PURE TRACK TALNET Titanium HD + Asus STX 
  hide details  
Reply
post #53 of 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steffek View Post

I am going to take a very good guess that anyone complaining about graphics in this game is either 12 years old or has a slight learning disability. Come on now people, this game is great. A few bugs here and there that will get fixed with a patch or two but what major game doesn't.

Why knock on your own age demographic? Comments like your's usually are derived from a young inexperienced mind. Don't get mad, i'm simply following your line of logic. "Anyone that thinks otherwise to my point of view" is a 12 year old with a disabled intellect
Edited by Nightingale - 11/10/15 at 1:49pm
My System
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 6700k@ 4.8Ghz Asus Maximus viii Hero Asus GTX 1080 Strix  GSkill Trident Z 3200 14-14-14 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
SanDisk Extreme Pro + 850 EVO 500GB EK Supremacy Nickel  WIN 7 x64 ASUS ROG PG279Q 27" 2560X1440 Gsync  
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
IBM Model M Corsair HX850 Corsair Obsidian 800D SteelSeries Rival 300 
Mouse PadAudio
PURE TRACK TALNET Titanium HD + Asus STX 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 6700k@ 4.8Ghz Asus Maximus viii Hero Asus GTX 1080 Strix  GSkill Trident Z 3200 14-14-14 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
SanDisk Extreme Pro + 850 EVO 500GB EK Supremacy Nickel  WIN 7 x64 ASUS ROG PG279Q 27" 2560X1440 Gsync  
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
IBM Model M Corsair HX850 Corsair Obsidian 800D SteelSeries Rival 300 
Mouse PadAudio
PURE TRACK TALNET Titanium HD + Asus STX 
  hide details  
Reply
post #54 of 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightingale View Post

No we live in an era were people have very low standards because they consistently settle for mediocrity. No reasonable person is expecting the game to look like Crysis 3 but for god sakes graphics technology has made a big leap since Fallout 3. This game appears to be 2 generations behind. It's about finding that happy medium between gameplay and graphics and Fallout 4 fails hard on the latter. I could understand if this game was developed by a smaller developer but considering this is a massive AAA title from a large developer based on a hugely successful franchise, I find it unacceptable to be charging customers a premium price for game worth half of that.

As usual wait six months for the community to complete the leg work Bethesda refuses to do and then pick the game up for $20

Completely wrong. It is not settling for mediocrity. It is called "priorities" and "wanting a fun game above all else" and graphics does NOT make fun. Engaging gameplay, lore, plot, characters, and/or immersion is what makes a game fun. That's why games like Minecraft are fun. They engage our interest and encourage creative thought. Graphics are nice when available, but not something considered at all important. If something silly like older generation graphics takes away from how fun a video game is, I honestly pity that person. Can the graphics look better? Yes. Would it be nice if they did? Sure! Does it matter at the end of the day? No.
Biggie Smalls
(22 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5-2500K Asus P8Z77-M EVGA Titan X Corsair Vengeance DDR3 16GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung 830 Pro Samsung 850 Pro Western Digital Black Caviar 64MB Cache Western Digital Black Caviar 64MB Cache 
Optical DriveCoolingOSMonitor
LG Bluray Combo Drive Corsair H50 Windows 7 Professional x64 Dell UltraSharp U3415W 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Ducky Shine 4 Blue/Red Corsair AX860 Corsair Obsidian 350D Razer Deathadder Chroma 
Mouse PadAudioAudioAudio
fUnc Mouse Mat Grace m9xx DAC/AMP ELAC B6 Schiit Lyr 2 
AudioAudio
Fostex TH-X00 (ebony cups with detachable cable... Sennheiser HD650 
  hide details  
Reply
Biggie Smalls
(22 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5-2500K Asus P8Z77-M EVGA Titan X Corsair Vengeance DDR3 16GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung 830 Pro Samsung 850 Pro Western Digital Black Caviar 64MB Cache Western Digital Black Caviar 64MB Cache 
Optical DriveCoolingOSMonitor
LG Bluray Combo Drive Corsair H50 Windows 7 Professional x64 Dell UltraSharp U3415W 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Ducky Shine 4 Blue/Red Corsair AX860 Corsair Obsidian 350D Razer Deathadder Chroma 
Mouse PadAudioAudioAudio
fUnc Mouse Mat Grace m9xx DAC/AMP ELAC B6 Schiit Lyr 2 
AudioAudio
Fostex TH-X00 (ebony cups with detachable cable... Sennheiser HD650 
  hide details  
Reply
post #55 of 217
While personally I think FO4 looks fantastic, I really dont think people understand how a game is made. Look at the budgets for lets say GTA:V vs Fallout 4.

GTA V development officially started in Sept. 2009 (according to official statement by take two) and was launched in 2013 for 360 and ps3, it looked like crap. Good for that generation, but crap. The another full 2 years go by for it to finally be released on PC. They had 6 years and $265,000,000.00 THATS 265 MILLION DOLLARS to improve upon its engine, graphics and detail. One LARGE studio focusing on one game for 6 YEARS.

According to what I can find Fallout 4 officially started production shortly after the release of Elder scrolls: Skyrim on a QUARTER OF THE BUDGET that went into GTAV with a studio that is much smaller and had less time to push out a working title, mind you they only have one go at it; its there first game with this rendition of creation engine. Fallout has much more to interact with than GTA and much more detail.

What I am trying to point out is:

6 years and $265 Million (and 3 tries at a release) = GTAV PC
3 years and about $66 Million = Fallout 4

YOU CANT COMPARE THEM GRAPHICALLY.


Fallout is in a class of its own, and it is reining king. show me another Post Apocalyptic game of this detail, and amount of content, and this good of graphics and I will gladly eat my own words.
Magma
(9 items)
 
Old Girl
(14 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
ryzen 1700X Asrock Fatality 370x ITX Gigabyte 1080 G1 Corsair DDR4 3200MHz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
SanDisk 500GB SSD Deepcool Captin AIO Windows 10 LG 27" 4K 
Case
BitFenix Portal 
  hide details  
Reply
Magma
(9 items)
 
Old Girl
(14 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
ryzen 1700X Asrock Fatality 370x ITX Gigabyte 1080 G1 Corsair DDR4 3200MHz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
SanDisk 500GB SSD Deepcool Captin AIO Windows 10 LG 27" 4K 
Case
BitFenix Portal 
  hide details  
Reply
post #56 of 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by OC'ing Noob View Post

Completely wrong. It is not settling for mediocrity. It is called "priorities" and "wanting a fun game above all else" and graphics does NOT make fun. Engaging gameplay, lore, plot, characters, and/or immersion is what makes a game fun. That's why games like Minecraft are fun. They engage our interest and encourage creative thought. Graphics are nice when available, but not something considered at all important. If something silly like older generation graphics takes away from how fun a video game is, I honestly pity that person. Can the graphics look better? Yes. Would it be nice if they did? Sure! Does it matter at the end of the day? No.

Tldr, Ryse looks pretty but is a boring piece of crap. Minecraft looks like crap but is massively fun. (Also helps that minecraft can be hugely modded something that FO4 can get tongue.gif)
post #57 of 217
Thread Starter 
Just added GameGPU.ru to the OP, also includes CPU Benchmarks and shows that it looks like this version of the engine can handle up to 12 threads.

Also added Guru3D. Looking for others too.

Added Tom's Hardware as well.
Edited by BiG StroOnZ - 11/10/15 at 2:36pm
post #58 of 217
bet nobody is moaning about the witcher 3 graphics downgrade now, eh? EH?
post #59 of 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by vmatt1203 View Post

While personally I think FO4 looks fantastic, I really dont think people understand how a game is made. Look at the budgets for lets say GTA:V vs Fallout 4.

GTA V development officially started in Sept. 2009 (according to official statement by take two) and was launched in 2013 for 360 and ps3, it looked like crap. Good for that generation, but crap. The another full 2 years go by for it to finally be released on PC. They had 6 years and $265,000,000.00 THATS 265 MILLION DOLLARS to improve upon its engine, graphics and detail. One LARGE studio focusing on one game for 6 YEARS.

According to what I can find Fallout 4 officially started production shortly after the release of Elder scrolls: Skyrim on a QUARTER OF THE BUDGET that went into GTAV with a studio that is much smaller and had less time to push out a working title, mind you they only have one go at it; its there first game with this rendition of creation engine. Fallout has much more to interact with than GTA and much more detail.

What I am trying to point out is:

6 years and $265 Million (and 3 tries at a release) = GTAV PC
3 years and about $66 Million = Fallout 4

YOU CANT COMPARE THEM GRAPHICALLY.


Fallout is in a class of its own, and it is reining king. show me another Post Apocalyptic game of this detail, and amount of content, and this good of graphics and I will gladly eat my own words.

I am not sure why I am answering since you find this game graphics fantastic but here goes (And this coming from someone actually working in games industry)
GTA V is available on five platforms, versus three for FO4. I cannot stress enough what a significant difference that is in terms of production, developing, QA/cert etc. and how many extra costs are involved. Also you might wanna check CDPR budget and size as company compared to beth. As for FO4 looking fantastic,being detailed etc. I will just not comment.
Mastodon Ryzen
(12 items)
 
HP Z220
(8 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
R7 1800X Asus Crosshair VI Hero Sapphire RX Vega 64 reference Gskill TridentZ 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Pny SSD 240GB Crucial MX100 CM Nepton 280L Win 10 
MonitorPowerCaseMouse
Acer Predator XG270HU Freesync XFX 750W Pro HAF XM Logitech G502 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsCooling
i7 3770 HP Quadro K2000 HP 
OSPowerCaseMouse
Win 7  HP 400W HP CMT RAT 7 
  hide details  
Reply
Mastodon Ryzen
(12 items)
 
HP Z220
(8 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
R7 1800X Asus Crosshair VI Hero Sapphire RX Vega 64 reference Gskill TridentZ 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Pny SSD 240GB Crucial MX100 CM Nepton 280L Win 10 
MonitorPowerCaseMouse
Acer Predator XG270HU Freesync XFX 750W Pro HAF XM Logitech G502 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsCooling
i7 3770 HP Quadro K2000 HP 
OSPowerCaseMouse
Win 7  HP 400W HP CMT RAT 7 
  hide details  
Reply
post #60 of 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newbie2009 View Post

bet nobody is moaning about the witcher 3 graphics downgrade now, eh? EH?
Nobody should have been crying about them to begin with.
Biggie Smalls
(22 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5-2500K Asus P8Z77-M EVGA Titan X Corsair Vengeance DDR3 16GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung 830 Pro Samsung 850 Pro Western Digital Black Caviar 64MB Cache Western Digital Black Caviar 64MB Cache 
Optical DriveCoolingOSMonitor
LG Bluray Combo Drive Corsair H50 Windows 7 Professional x64 Dell UltraSharp U3415W 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Ducky Shine 4 Blue/Red Corsair AX860 Corsair Obsidian 350D Razer Deathadder Chroma 
Mouse PadAudioAudioAudio
fUnc Mouse Mat Grace m9xx DAC/AMP ELAC B6 Schiit Lyr 2 
AudioAudio
Fostex TH-X00 (ebony cups with detachable cable... Sennheiser HD650 
  hide details  
Reply
Biggie Smalls
(22 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5-2500K Asus P8Z77-M EVGA Titan X Corsair Vengeance DDR3 16GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung 830 Pro Samsung 850 Pro Western Digital Black Caviar 64MB Cache Western Digital Black Caviar 64MB Cache 
Optical DriveCoolingOSMonitor
LG Bluray Combo Drive Corsair H50 Windows 7 Professional x64 Dell UltraSharp U3415W 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Ducky Shine 4 Blue/Red Corsair AX860 Corsair Obsidian 350D Razer Deathadder Chroma 
Mouse PadAudioAudioAudio
fUnc Mouse Mat Grace m9xx DAC/AMP ELAC B6 Schiit Lyr 2 
AudioAudio
Fostex TH-X00 (ebony cups with detachable cable... Sennheiser HD650 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Software News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Software News › [Various] Fallout 4 PC GPU & CPU Benchmarks (Tenth Update)