Overclock.net › Forums › Overclock.net Forum › Forum Platform Help and Discussion  › unable to edit thread's OP
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

unable to edit thread's OP - Page 2

post #11 of 26
Actually it is for all posts and the time is from submitting the post, unless the backlend options have changed since I retired.
post #12 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitemarks and bloodstains View Post

Actually it is for all posts and the time is from submitting the post, unless the backlend options have changed since I retired.

 

E clearly states that it's for threads:

 

http://www.overclock.net/t/1589014/thread-edit-permissions-for-threads-aged-1-year

It's a computer!
(19 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-2500K @ 4.5GHz (1.368-1.384V fixed voltage) ASUS P8P67 EVO B3 (UEFI ver. 1850) GTX 780 ASUS DirectCU II (1228 / 6300, 1.180V) G.SKILL Ripjaws X 8GB (2 x 4GB) 1866MHz, CL9 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
250 GB Samsung 840 EVO (C:\) 250 GB Samsung 840 EVO (D:\) 150 GB WD VelociRaptor Samsung SH-S243N 24x DVD Burner 
Optical DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung SH-S203N 20X DVD Burner Thermaltake Frio Win 7 Home Premium x64 SP1 Retail AOC G2460PG (24" 1920 x 1080 144Hz G-SYNC) 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Filco Majestouch 104-key Cherry MX Blues w/NKRO Corsair HX650 (Bronze, ordered on 12-12-2009) CM 690 Intellimouse Optical (1.1A) 1000Hz polling rate 
Mouse PadAudioAudio
Basic, but premium round X-Fi Titanium HD Klipsch ProMedia 2.1 (with 16 AWG Monster Cable... 
  hide details  
Reply
It's a computer!
(19 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-2500K @ 4.5GHz (1.368-1.384V fixed voltage) ASUS P8P67 EVO B3 (UEFI ver. 1850) GTX 780 ASUS DirectCU II (1228 / 6300, 1.180V) G.SKILL Ripjaws X 8GB (2 x 4GB) 1866MHz, CL9 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
250 GB Samsung 840 EVO (C:\) 250 GB Samsung 840 EVO (D:\) 150 GB WD VelociRaptor Samsung SH-S243N 24x DVD Burner 
Optical DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung SH-S203N 20X DVD Burner Thermaltake Frio Win 7 Home Premium x64 SP1 Retail AOC G2460PG (24" 1920 x 1080 144Hz G-SYNC) 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Filco Majestouch 104-key Cherry MX Blues w/NKRO Corsair HX650 (Bronze, ordered on 12-12-2009) CM 690 Intellimouse Optical (1.1A) 1000Hz polling rate 
Mouse PadAudioAudio
Basic, but premium round X-Fi Titanium HD Klipsch ProMedia 2.1 (with 16 AWG Monster Cable... 
  hide details  
Reply
post #13 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by doyll View Post

But for someone with a post count as big as mine trying to delete everything posted would require a total nut case. Just think how freaky nuts you would have to be to try deleting or editing your 69,463 post from Mini Sota? biggrin.gif
There was one such case not long ago with a member with over 10k posts where they tried to wipe everything... I caught it after about 110 edits (all from recent posts so this new change wouldn't have helped). Not exactly light work.
Deep Blood
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 920 D0 (Batch # 3901A240) Foxconn X58 Blood Rage (non-GTI) eVGA GeForce GTX670 2GB 6GB Corsair Dominator 1.6GHz TR3X6G1600C8D Rev 3.2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung SSD830 128GB / Seagate 640GB+1TB+2TB+4TB Samsung SH-S223Q 22X XTTH | OCZ Freeze | 9G1212H1011 Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell U2410f (rev. A02) Code 104 w/O-rings + Vortex doubleshot keycaps Antec HCPP-850 CaseLabs SM8 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Logitech G500 Sharkoon 1337 Asus Xonar DX + Swan D1080MkII08 + MXL Tempo Lifecam Cinema 
  hide details  
Reply
Deep Blood
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 920 D0 (Batch # 3901A240) Foxconn X58 Blood Rage (non-GTI) eVGA GeForce GTX670 2GB 6GB Corsair Dominator 1.6GHz TR3X6G1600C8D Rev 3.2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung SSD830 128GB / Seagate 640GB+1TB+2TB+4TB Samsung SH-S223Q 22X XTTH | OCZ Freeze | 9G1212H1011 Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell U2410f (rev. A02) Code 104 w/O-rings + Vortex doubleshot keycaps Antec HCPP-850 CaseLabs SM8 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Logitech G500 Sharkoon 1337 Asus Xonar DX + Swan D1080MkII08 + MXL Tempo Lifecam Cinema 
  hide details  
Reply
post #14 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoCables View Post

This only applies to threads that you created, not all of your posts.

I didn't know that this was a problem though. The problem as stated is: "We have unfortunately had issues in the past where users have decided to remove what we consider valuable content that should be available to all for as long as possible."

No one ever said that people were deleting 100% of the content in their thread's OP.
My post was based on what ENTERPRISE said in post #5 above
"We have had issues in the past with members who have decided to leave OCN for whatever reason who have also decided to delete their submitted content."
I understood 'delete their submitted content' as 'delete all posts.'

But honestly, why should someone be able to edit a post even a few days after they post it? Granted, they may have posted something incorrectly, but that's life. What we post on a forum is akin to what we say in a conversation. We can't go back and 'edit' what we say in a conversation, so why should be be able to do it here? I know, that is a rather extreme analogy, because many of the post are informational, meaning changing mistakes is content is a good thing, But how often is a mistake not found and corrected in fist week?

Also, how many years is most information relevant? Things change rapidly in this industry. Granted, not everything, but maybe the 'no edit / delete' should be from a few weeks to a year rather than over a year old ??

As for Chunky_Chimp
"a member with over 10k posts where they tried to wipe everything... I caught it after about 110 edits"
Not knowing the details, I don't know the user's intent or how many posts they would have ultimately deleted, but I seriously doubt it would have reached 1000, let alone 10,000.. And how do we know this member was in fact actually trying to wipe everything? I would thing a member in that scenario would start with what they considered their most important contributions, and once they were all deleted just leave.


i've moderated on forums in the past .. still do. My experience is members posting on a very active forum more than about 3,000 posts a year are usually general conversation with little important content. For example, I post approx. 3000 a year. Many of them are just talk with little or no real content.

Obviously this is a generalization so there are exceptions, but as a general rule any member leaving a forum and deleting their post is not going to make much of an impact on the forum. And if a forum is having many members with important content leaving and deleting, it's time for that forum to be taking a hard look at what is causing the migration, rather than 'sticking their finger in the dyke' trying to stop it. The problem is not members deleting and leaving, but why members are are doing it.. wink.gif

Changing horses here, but a 'Wiki' for each area might be a better way to store and organize important information. Problem is the logistics of setup and organization. Been there, done that, didn't like that t-shirt. wink.gif
Edited by doyll - 1/26/16 at 12:59am
post #15 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoCables View Post

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bitemarks and bloodstains View Post



Actually it is for all posts and the time is from submitting the post, unless the backlend options have changed since I retired.



 



E clearly states that it's for threads:



 



http://www.overclock.net/t/1589014/thread-edit-permissions-for-threads-aged-1-year


 



That actually will need editing which I will do later on as the system does indeed affect posts also.
post #16 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by doyll View Post

Not knowing the details, I don't know the user's intent or how many posts they would have ultimately deleted, but I seriously doubt it would have reached 1000, let alone 10,000.. And how do we know this member was in fact actually trying to wipe everything? I would thing a member in that scenario would start with what they considered their most important contributions, and once they were all deleted just leave.
The observed rate of editing (a post every couple seconds) and the fact that it was done with total disregard as to what was in those posts, only seeming to care to move back from newest posts to oldest, indicated an intended clean-sweep of all content. I don't know how far he would have gone if I'd have left him alone but I didn't want to find out.
Deep Blood
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 920 D0 (Batch # 3901A240) Foxconn X58 Blood Rage (non-GTI) eVGA GeForce GTX670 2GB 6GB Corsair Dominator 1.6GHz TR3X6G1600C8D Rev 3.2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung SSD830 128GB / Seagate 640GB+1TB+2TB+4TB Samsung SH-S223Q 22X XTTH | OCZ Freeze | 9G1212H1011 Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell U2410f (rev. A02) Code 104 w/O-rings + Vortex doubleshot keycaps Antec HCPP-850 CaseLabs SM8 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Logitech G500 Sharkoon 1337 Asus Xonar DX + Swan D1080MkII08 + MXL Tempo Lifecam Cinema 
  hide details  
Reply
Deep Blood
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 920 D0 (Batch # 3901A240) Foxconn X58 Blood Rage (non-GTI) eVGA GeForce GTX670 2GB 6GB Corsair Dominator 1.6GHz TR3X6G1600C8D Rev 3.2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung SSD830 128GB / Seagate 640GB+1TB+2TB+4TB Samsung SH-S223Q 22X XTTH | OCZ Freeze | 9G1212H1011 Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell U2410f (rev. A02) Code 104 w/O-rings + Vortex doubleshot keycaps Antec HCPP-850 CaseLabs SM8 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Logitech G500 Sharkoon 1337 Asus Xonar DX + Swan D1080MkII08 + MXL Tempo Lifecam Cinema 
  hide details  
Reply
post #17 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chunky_Chimp View Post

The observed rate of editing (a post every couple seconds) and the fact that it was done with total disregard as to what was in those posts, only seeming to care to move back from newest posts to oldest, indicated an intended clean-sweep of all content. I don't know how far he would have gone if I'd have left him alone but I didn't want to find out.
Okay, that would lead me to believe user was indeed mad (maybe even nuts) and trying to delete their posts. thumb.gif

For the sake of discussion, why not let them delete them? And why is it 'okay' to edit / delete for a year, but not older posts? As a general rule i would think most posts less then a year old are more relevant tot most members than posts over a year old.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I just don't see many members posting information that is so important the forum would be hurt by it's loss.

On the other hand, you as a mod have the power to decide what posts to delete or edit. I assume there is no 1 year limit on your ability to edit or delete. So why should a member not have the same control over their own posts? On one forum I was a mod all of a members posts were deleted after banning them for life. Other forums I've worked with regular deleted posts over a certain age to keep storage at levels forum could afford.

We can discuss all of this here, but the reality of forums is the members have no rights .. none at all. Forums are their own little worlds with all power and control in the hands of the owners and leading staff, admin, mods. Forum hierarchy is the cyber equivalent of medieval kingdoms. Owner/s of the forum has total control over everything. There is no 'forum members rights tribunal' for a forum member to that a complaint to, no 'League of Forums' or 'United Forums' organizations working to give forum members any support against 'forum lords', 'forum pirates' etc. I'm not complaining, just saying how forums work. biggrin.gif Some care more about their members and what is 'right and fair' than others. OCN is a good forum.
post #18 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by doyll View Post

For the sake of discussion, why not let them delete them? And why is it 'okay' to edit / delete for a year, but not older posts? As a general rule i would think most posts less then a year old are more relevant tot most members than posts over a year old.
Technical/logistical limitations. The only viable solution I know of to stymie that kind of behavior (which I won't mention) can't be done for a long time if ever for the same reason. As for "why not let them delete them?", it's strictly against the ToS. As for why it's against the ToS... I don't know. That rule's probably been around longer than I've been registered, and I've never really looked into it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by doyll View Post

We can discuss all of this here, but the reality of forums is the members have no rights .. none at all. Forums are their own little worlds with all power and control in the hands of the owners and leading staff, admin, mods. Forum hierarchy is the cyber equivalent of medieval kingdoms. Owner/s of the forum has total control over everything. There is no 'forum members rights tribunal' for a forum member to that a complaint to, no 'League of Forums' or 'United Forums' organizations working to give forum members any support against 'forum lords', 'forum pirates' etc. I'm not complaining, just saying how forums work. biggrin.gif Some care more about their members and what is 'right and fair' than others. OCN is a good forum.
Indeed. It's the same deal any time the "1st amendment" argument is brought up. Websites are private entities that can set their own rules and guidelines on what can and can't be said/done. Basically, you can have all the free speech you want... within the rules. Break the rules you agreed to and that right doesn't really mean much.
Deep Blood
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 920 D0 (Batch # 3901A240) Foxconn X58 Blood Rage (non-GTI) eVGA GeForce GTX670 2GB 6GB Corsair Dominator 1.6GHz TR3X6G1600C8D Rev 3.2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung SSD830 128GB / Seagate 640GB+1TB+2TB+4TB Samsung SH-S223Q 22X XTTH | OCZ Freeze | 9G1212H1011 Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell U2410f (rev. A02) Code 104 w/O-rings + Vortex doubleshot keycaps Antec HCPP-850 CaseLabs SM8 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Logitech G500 Sharkoon 1337 Asus Xonar DX + Swan D1080MkII08 + MXL Tempo Lifecam Cinema 
  hide details  
Reply
Deep Blood
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 920 D0 (Batch # 3901A240) Foxconn X58 Blood Rage (non-GTI) eVGA GeForce GTX670 2GB 6GB Corsair Dominator 1.6GHz TR3X6G1600C8D Rev 3.2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung SSD830 128GB / Seagate 640GB+1TB+2TB+4TB Samsung SH-S223Q 22X XTTH | OCZ Freeze | 9G1212H1011 Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell U2410f (rev. A02) Code 104 w/O-rings + Vortex doubleshot keycaps Antec HCPP-850 CaseLabs SM8 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Logitech G500 Sharkoon 1337 Asus Xonar DX + Swan D1080MkII08 + MXL Tempo Lifecam Cinema 
  hide details  
Reply
post #19 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chunky_Chimp View Post

Technical/logistical limitations. The only viable solution I know of to stymie that kind of behavior (which I won't mention) can't be done for a long time if ever for the same reason. As for "why not let them delete them?", it's strictly against the ToS. As for why it's against the ToS... I don't know. That rule's probably been around longer than I've been registered, and I've never really looked into it..
Server ToS or OCN ToS?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chunky_Chimp View Post


Indeed. It's the same deal any time the "1st amendment" argument is brought up. Websites are private entities that can set their own rules and guidelines on what can and can't be said/done. Basically, you can have all the free speech you want... within the rules. Break the rules you agreed to and that right doesn't really mean much.
I disagree only with 'Break the rules you agreed to' This 1 year limit on editing / deleting posts is a perfect example of a rule not agreed to. the 'Entity of OCN' decided to make a 1-year rule and now members of OCN have to live with it. No 'agreement' was ever made between 'entity' and 'members'.

For the benefit of others who may be reading this '1st amendment' refers to USA Constitution.
Quote:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. - See more at: http://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment1.html#sthash.IwkwirpY.dpuf
While many countries have some rights similar to this, few are as complete in their coverage or application. Now the 'USA PATRIOT actt' (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism)" and it's use by organizations liek Homeland Security overrule many personal rights written in the consistutution. Basically, if they say your actions may be effecting the security of the USA you have few if any of the basic rights the constitution give people in USA
post #20 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by doyll View Post

Server ToS or OCN ToS?
OCN's, of course. I don't know of any sites where you agree to the host server's terms...
Quote:
Originally Posted by doyll View Post

I disagree only with 'Break the rules you agreed to' This 1 year limit on editing / deleting posts is a perfect example of a rule not agreed to. the 'Entity of OCN' decided to make a 1-year rule and now members of OCN have to live with it. No 'agreement' was ever made between 'entity' and 'members'.
I was making a point relating to yours, what I said didn't have anything to do with the 1-year edit lock. That's a piece of site functionality, not a term to agree with. The related term is the one involving not mass-erasing one's own content. There is one inaccuracy, though, ticking the box "I agree" when you register tells us you read and agreed to the ToS even if you didn't actually read them, so you're still whacked when you break a rule. A real world example would be you getting pulled over and ticketed for talking on your phone while driving, and you telling the officer you didn't know it was against the law in that state. You'll still get the ticket because you still broke the rules. But let's not go too far down that rabbit hole, this isn't the thread for that.
Deep Blood
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 920 D0 (Batch # 3901A240) Foxconn X58 Blood Rage (non-GTI) eVGA GeForce GTX670 2GB 6GB Corsair Dominator 1.6GHz TR3X6G1600C8D Rev 3.2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung SSD830 128GB / Seagate 640GB+1TB+2TB+4TB Samsung SH-S223Q 22X XTTH | OCZ Freeze | 9G1212H1011 Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell U2410f (rev. A02) Code 104 w/O-rings + Vortex doubleshot keycaps Antec HCPP-850 CaseLabs SM8 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Logitech G500 Sharkoon 1337 Asus Xonar DX + Swan D1080MkII08 + MXL Tempo Lifecam Cinema 
  hide details  
Reply
Deep Blood
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 920 D0 (Batch # 3901A240) Foxconn X58 Blood Rage (non-GTI) eVGA GeForce GTX670 2GB 6GB Corsair Dominator 1.6GHz TR3X6G1600C8D Rev 3.2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung SSD830 128GB / Seagate 640GB+1TB+2TB+4TB Samsung SH-S223Q 22X XTTH | OCZ Freeze | 9G1212H1011 Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell U2410f (rev. A02) Code 104 w/O-rings + Vortex doubleshot keycaps Antec HCPP-850 CaseLabs SM8 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Logitech G500 Sharkoon 1337 Asus Xonar DX + Swan D1080MkII08 + MXL Tempo Lifecam Cinema 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Overclock.net › Forums › Overclock.net Forum › Forum Platform Help and Discussion  › unable to edit thread's OP