Not in the least bit surprised. The Gtx X70 has always been on par (or at least close to) with the previous generation's flagship. I'm more concerned about how much weaker it is compared to the GTX 1080. The price to performance disparity makes it a "meh" value compared to the GTX 970. If the price was 330 like the GTX 970 was, I would agree that it will sell like hotcakes.
Not in the least bit surprised. The Gtx X70 has always been on par (or at least close to) with the previous generation's flagship. I'm more concerned about how much weaker it is compared to the GTX 1080. The price to performance disparity makes it a "meh" value compared to the GTX 970. If the price was 330 like the GTX 970 was, I would agree that it will sell like hotcakes.
Good thing: stock performance
Bad thing:Bad OC
Quote:
This time we are not including overclocking results in our charts, but we will tell you what we know. It appears that overclocked GTX 1070 will not beat GTX 1080 in synthetic benchmarks (hitting around 4450 GPU points in Ultra). More importantly GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition suffers from the same power limitation problem, that we know from GTX 1080.
You mean thats the highest score Videocardz have found. Doesnt mean it is its limit.
Also both GTX 1070 and GTX 1080 comes with 1x8pin. Should be a lot more juice on the GTX 1070. Perhaps it comes down to cooling instead on the GTX 1070 and people should aim more for AIBs?
Good thing: stock performance
Bad thing:Bad OC
GTX980TI 1500/8000 have 5026GPU score
1070 after OC 4450
This time we are not including overclocking results in our charts, but we will tell you what we know. It appears that overclocked GTX 1070 will not beat GTX 1080 in synthetic benchmarks (hitting around 4450 GPU points in Ultra). More importantly GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition suffers from the same power limitation problem, that we know from GTX 1080.
I really doubt AIBs will be selling a superior product for less price. Just how many AIB 980TIs actually sold for the $650 msrp? The cheapest was $679 for a very long time.
I wouldn't be surprised if the usual MSI/GB/ASUS custom cards were more expensive than the FE, and the only lower MSRP cards are the bargain bin quality cards with a blower weaker than the reference.
These benchmarks are funny to me because because there are a ton of 1080s that aren't beating my 1480mhz clocked 980TI by itself, and 1450mhz in SLI.
If i'm beating all these 1080s, how is a 1070 gonna compete?
i'm sure 1080 AIB's will beat me though
you will see 980ti's at around 350-450, alot of issues with these benchmarks is that they are just throwing a stock 980ti in with nothing done to it, yet balancing the newer cards performance.
A bunch of people on /r/PCMR rebenchmarked there 980ti's and saw that they were under performing in alot of big name benchmarks like Guru3D compared to there results.
I'm getting 21.8k for my GPU score on one 980ti right now, 40.8k with 2.
I've literally seen benchmarkers show a 980ti as low as 15k GPU Score, my 980TI at stock gets over 17, so somethings fishy.
on the bright side, i want to get 1080s for VR, loving the stuff so far, its addictive but i want a MMO ;o
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.2K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!