Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › [VC] RX 480 allegedly legit 3DMark scores
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[VC] RX 480 allegedly legit 3DMark scores - Page 2

post #11 of 375
980+ performance at a 199$ pricepoint, cant complain about that.
if the OC is good then its a huge value/performance offering. thumb.gif
Thyslexia
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1600 ga B350 gaming 3 Nitro sapphire 390 16gb corsair lpx 2933mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
samsung 850 pro  sony water w10 64bit Pro 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
acer xg270hu 1440p 144hz! steelseries 6gv2 Corsair 750w Cm 840 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
corsair deathadder (G400 cable went bad) sennheiser HD 600 asus essence stx 
  hide details  
Reply
Thyslexia
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1600 ga B350 gaming 3 Nitro sapphire 390 16gb corsair lpx 2933mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
samsung 850 pro  sony water w10 64bit Pro 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
acer xg270hu 1440p 144hz! steelseries 6gv2 Corsair 750w Cm 840 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
corsair deathadder (G400 cable went bad) sennheiser HD 600 asus essence stx 
  hide details  
Reply
post #12 of 375
Dunno how good or bad this. From reviews I seen, Fury x is more in line with the 980 in games across the board, looks a lot faster in this bench.

If this is virtually identical performance to a 290x/390x then is a pass for me.
post #13 of 375
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarrisLam View Post

how did they manage to not include GTX970 in the chart.....

so I did a bit of searching and GTX970 came out to be around 56xx for firestrike extreme.

Still a pretty good deal I suppose, but the card is less powerful than I thought it would be....

Wait a few more days. That's average, i've seen 970s score higher. My 290 at stock gets 4700. 6000 oc'ed.
Second Intel Rig
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2700 4.5/ 1.28 77 1050 16 / 1866 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
1000 212 10 64 32 1080 
PowerCase
700 912 
  hide details  
Reply
Second Intel Rig
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2700 4.5/ 1.28 77 1050 16 / 1866 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
1000 212 10 64 32 1080 
PowerCase
700 912 
  hide details  
Reply
post #14 of 375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newbie2009 View Post

Dunno how good or bad this. From reviews I seen, Fury x is more in line with the 980 in games across the board, looks a lot faster in this bench.

If this is virtually identical performance to a 290x/390x then is a pass for me.

980 is on par with 390X, not Fury X.
Mastodon Ryzen
(12 items)
 
HP Z220
(8 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
R7 1800X Asus Crosshair VI Hero Sapphire RX Vega 64 reference Gskill TridentZ 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Pny SSD 240GB Crucial MX100 CM Nepton 280L Win 10 
MonitorPowerCaseMouse
Acer Predator XG270HU Freesync XFX 750W Pro HAF XM Logitech G502 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsCooling
i7 3770 HP Quadro K2000 HP 
OSPowerCaseMouse
Win 7  HP 400W HP CMT RAT 7 
  hide details  
Reply
Mastodon Ryzen
(12 items)
 
HP Z220
(8 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
R7 1800X Asus Crosshair VI Hero Sapphire RX Vega 64 reference Gskill TridentZ 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Pny SSD 240GB Crucial MX100 CM Nepton 280L Win 10 
MonitorPowerCaseMouse
Acer Predator XG270HU Freesync XFX 750W Pro HAF XM Logitech G502 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsCooling
i7 3770 HP Quadro K2000 HP 
OSPowerCaseMouse
Win 7  HP 400W HP CMT RAT 7 
  hide details  
Reply
post #15 of 375
i'll probably still get this or the 490(x) just because I base my purchases with performance to price.
My build
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
8350 MSI 970 Gaming  R9 290x 4GB Evga SSC 1866 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
samsung 850 evo lg thermaltek nic c4 microsoft 
MonitorPowerCaseMouse
asus vq evga g2 cooler master k380 logitech 402 
  hide details  
Reply
My build
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
8350 MSI 970 Gaming  R9 290x 4GB Evga SSC 1866 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
samsung 850 evo lg thermaltek nic c4 microsoft 
MonitorPowerCaseMouse
asus vq evga g2 cooler master k380 logitech 402 
  hide details  
Reply
post #16 of 375
This seems believable to me. I hope they're correct, because my GTX780 is starting to slow down for no apparent reason.
Little Black Box
(19 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-4670k ASRock Z87-I EVGA GTX 1070 Crucial Ballistix Sport 8GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Plextor M5M 128GB SSD Western Digital 1TB HDD Sandisk Ultra II Corsair Hydro H55 
OSMonitorMonitorKeyboard
Windows 10 Pro ASUS PB298Q LG 25UM56-P Ducky DK9008G2 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair SF450 SilverStone Sugo SG13b Zowie ZA11 Glorious Extended Mouse Mat 
AudioAudioAudio
Creative X-Fi HD AKG K550 Garage 1217 Project Starlight, RCA 6SN7GTB 
  hide details  
Reply
Little Black Box
(19 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-4670k ASRock Z87-I EVGA GTX 1070 Crucial Ballistix Sport 8GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Plextor M5M 128GB SSD Western Digital 1TB HDD Sandisk Ultra II Corsair Hydro H55 
OSMonitorMonitorKeyboard
Windows 10 Pro ASUS PB298Q LG 25UM56-P Ducky DK9008G2 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair SF450 SilverStone Sugo SG13b Zowie ZA11 Glorious Extended Mouse Mat 
AudioAudioAudio
Creative X-Fi HD AKG K550 Garage 1217 Project Starlight, RCA 6SN7GTB 
  hide details  
Reply
post #17 of 375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuivamaa View Post

980 is on par with 390X, not Fury X.

In most games, fury x is closer to the 980 than the 980ti. (unless things have changed drastically since I looked at some reviews on release on the fury x)
post #18 of 375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newbie2009 View Post

In most games, fury x is closer to the 980 than the 980ti. (unless things have changed drastically since I looked at some reviews on release on the fury x)

maybe at DX11 titles at 1080p and gameworks titles.

At 4K, DX12 etc. the Fury (X) are pretty good.

(also depends on whether the 980 (TI) is heavily overclocked)
current rig
(4 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsGraphicsKeyboard
2500k R9 290X Tri-X GTX 680 Filco Majestouch 2 Brown Ninja 
  hide details  
Reply
current rig
(4 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsGraphicsKeyboard
2500k R9 290X Tri-X GTX 680 Filco Majestouch 2 Brown Ninja 
  hide details  
Reply
post #19 of 375
Quote:
Originally Posted by flopper View Post

980+ performance at a 199$ pricepoint, cant complain about that.
if the OC is good then its a huge value/performance offering. thumb.gif

It scores below the 980 in this chart so not 980 + performance or am i missing something? Not saying its not good performance for 199$ but its not 980 + smile.gif
Andromeda
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
7700K Asus Z270G Strix GTX 1080 Strix Triden Z RGB 3600 CL16 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
M.2 Samsung Evo 960 Kraken X62 Win 10 Acer XB270HU 144hz IPS GSYNC 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Black Widow Tournament Corsair 860i NZXT S340 Elite Corsair Sabre Optical 
  hide details  
Reply
Andromeda
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
7700K Asus Z270G Strix GTX 1080 Strix Triden Z RGB 3600 CL16 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
M.2 Samsung Evo 960 Kraken X62 Win 10 Acer XB270HU 144hz IPS GSYNC 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Black Widow Tournament Corsair 860i NZXT S340 Elite Corsair Sabre Optical 
  hide details  
Reply
post #20 of 375
Ok, numbers look good. But they said that we shall see some specs leaks too.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › [VC] RX 480 allegedly legit 3DMark scores