Originally Posted by EightDee8D
2.06/0.73= 2.81x more fps/w
don't see the problem here.
Once again, 180 is Furmark power consumption, and even then it usually is below, according to TPU measurements.
Real gaming power consumption is more like 120 watts, so let's see what it lands us into with those benches:
AotS: 46 fps vs 28 for 110 watts over 120, 1.8x perf/watt
Hitman: .... 2.3x perf/watt, but it's an outlier
Overwatch: ... 1.73x perf/watt
3DMark: ... 1.78x marks/watt
You see where i am going with this? Until i see that 110 watts is Furmark power consumption, that's the numbers i take over AMD slides. Make no mistake, it's still a ridiculous perf/watt jump, but we talk about 1.5 node shrink in the first place.