Overclock.net banner

[OC3D] AMD RX 480 Specifications Leak on Newegg listing

13K views 132 replies 60 participants last post by  Kokin 
#1 ·
http://www.overclock3d.net/articles/gpu_displays/amd_rx_480_specifications_leak_on_newegg_listing/1
Quote:
The specifications of AMD's RX 480 Specifications have Leaked on Newegg listings, revealing that the new AMD GPU will have base/boost GPU clocks. This makes AMD's RX 480 GPUs much more similar to Nvidia GPUs in terms of clock speed variance during gameplay.

This listing on Newegg has now been taken offline, but thankfully the people over at PCPER has managed to grab a screenshot while the listing was still online.

The VisionTek RX 480 GPU is not listed as a factory overclocked model, so it is expected that this GPU features AMD's reference clock speeds, with the GPU having a 1120MHz base clock and a 1266MHz boost clock.

At this time, it is unknown how this new base/boost clock speed model will affect this GPUs performance and overclocking ability.
 
See less See more
1
#2 ·
I am bit out of the loop. So are all cards going to be RX cards? Did AMD say anything about that.

When they revealed it I thought it to be a placeholder like they aren't sure whether it's R7 or R9.

Will it be like all cards are named RX 460, RX 460X - RX 490 and RX 490X ?
headscratch.gif
 
#3 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by zealord View Post

I am bit out of the loop. So are all cards going to be RX cards? Did AMD say anything about that.

When they revealed it I thought it to be a placeholder like they aren't sure whether it's R7 or R9.

Will it be like all cards are named RX 460, RX 460X - RX 490 and RX 490X ?
headscratch.gif
It seems like it.
 
#9 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjdubb View Post

2304 Cuda Cores.... "how you like them apples", said the RX 480 to the GTX 1070.
They have stolen cuda cores from Nvidia to make their card good. I knew it!
 
#11 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by kylzer View Post

No X

Just
RX480
RX470
RX460
Which is a LOT better in my opinion. Having R7 vs R9, and then X version of the R9s created a bit of a mess. (much in the same way their CPU names are also confusing as all hell)

Though on the flip side, you're going to have bigger gaps between cards (Where previously you had 380, 380X, 390 and 390X, now you only have 2)
 
#12 ·
So the follow up (vega) is going to be the RX 490 then.
 
#15 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exeed Orbit View Post

RX 490 and Fury Successor (?)
28nm being so long, hard to compare.

Simpler to just say the RX 480 = HD7870, RX 490 = HD7970.
 
#16 ·
Maybe this how they will do it this year?

Rx 460=GTX 1050
Rx 470=GTX 1060
Rx 480=GTX 1070
Rx 490=GTX 1080
Rx Fury=GTX 1080ti

And sup with that page saying CUDA cores??
 
#17 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Awsan View Post

Maybe this how they will do it this year?

Rx 460=GTX 1050
Rx 470=GTX 1060
Rx 480=GTX 1070
Rx 490=GTX 1080
Rx Fury=GTX 1080ti

And sup with that page saying CUDA cores??
When it was live if you expanded the specs it gave the same count for stream processors and cuda cores. Obviously a typo on neweggs part.
 
#18 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Awsan View Post

Maybe this how they will do it this year?

Rx 460=GTX 1050
Rx 470=GTX 1060
Rx 480=GTX 1070
Rx 490=GTX 1080
Rx Fury=GTX 1080ti

And sup with that page saying CUDA cores??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Awsan View Post

Maybe this how they will do it this year?

Rx 460=GTX 1050
Rx 470=GTX 1060
Rx 480=GTX 1070
Rx 490=GTX 1080
Rx Fury=GTX 1080ti

And sup with that page saying CUDA cores??
Don't think the RX480 will be close to the 1070.
 
#19 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by zealord View Post

I am bit out of the loop. So are all cards going to be RX cards? Did AMD say anything about that.

When they revealed it I thought it to be a placeholder like they aren't sure whether it's R7 or R9.

Will it be like all cards are named RX 460, RX 460X - RX 490 and RX 490X ?
headscratch.gif
Is the X supposed to be a Roman numeral 10 or is RX supposed to be mean "prescription"?

R7
R9
RX
 
#21 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by zealord View Post

I am bit out of the loop. So are all cards going to be RX cards? Did AMD say anything about that.

When they revealed it I thought it to be a placeholder like they aren't sure whether it's R7 or R9.

Will it be like all cards are named RX 460, RX 460X - RX 490 and RX 490X ?
headscratch.gif
Radeon Xpress cards are RX. The RX480 is the highest performing RX card.

That's all we've been told. Lotta stupid websites are saying it's also the biggest Polaris we'll see, which while plausible may not be accurate.

I sincerely doubt AMD is gonna fail to hound nVidia all the way up the product list.
 
#23 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newbie2009 View Post

So the follow up (vega) is going to be the RX 490 then.
RX 490 and Fury Successor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Awsan View Post

Maybe this how they will do it this year?

Rx 460=GTX 1050
Rx 470=GTX 1060
Rx 480=GTX 1070
Rx 490=GTX 1080
Rx Fury=GTX 1080ti

And sup with that page saying CUDA cores??
Nope, 480 is designed to compete with the 1060. A $200 (or $250) card cannot possibly compete with a $380 card.

My guess is that they will include A Fury and a Fury X variant
 
#24 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newbie2009 View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Awsan View Post

Maybe this how they will do it this year?

Rx 460=GTX 1050
Rx 470=GTX 1060
Rx 480=GTX 1070
Rx 490=GTX 1080
Rx Fury=GTX 1080ti

And sup with that page saying CUDA cores??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Awsan View Post

Maybe this how they will do it this year?

Rx 460=GTX 1050
Rx 470=GTX 1060
Rx 480=GTX 1070
Rx 490=GTX 1080
Rx Fury=GTX 1080ti

And sup with that page saying CUDA cores??
Don't think the RX480 will be close to the 1070.
I agree but i was just thinking maybe thats their naming plan.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aweir View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by zealord View Post

I am bit out of the loop. So are all cards going to be RX cards? Did AMD say anything about that.

When they revealed it I thought it to be a placeholder like they aren't sure whether it's R7 or R9.

Will it be like all cards are named RX 460, RX 460X - RX 490 and RX 490X ?
headscratch.gif
Is the X supposed to be a Roman numeral 10?

R7
R9
RX
Hmmm interesting but if i were to use that then i will go

Rx fury
Rx fury x
R9 490
R9 480
 
#25 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by aweir View Post

Is the X supposed to be a Roman numeral 10?

R7
R9
RX
It would be an absolute disaster to combine roman numerals with letters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmericanLoco View Post

The only thing the model number has to do is indicate relative performance within a graphics family. I don't see why the model number has to indicate whether or not it's a "full die".
because they always did?? and the CU/shader units count is basically the main indicator of performance.

So you think it would be fine If you buy a RX480 and get 2304 CU's and I buy a RX480 and get 2560 CUs ??

This makes absolutely no sense. You make no sense.
 
#26 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by zealord View Post

It would be an absolute disaster to combine roman numerals with letters.
because they always did?? and the CU/shader units count is basically the main indicator of performance.

So you think it would be fine If you buy a RX480 and get 2304 CU's and I buy a RX480 and get 2560 CUs ??

This makes absolutely no sense. You make no sense.
What? Why would you assume that there would be two different RX480's under the same name?

It would be more like the RX460 got 2304 CUs and the RX480 gets 2560 CUs. The R7/R9 nomenclature was largely useless anyway, since the following number (290, 280, 270, etc) was still sequential. There wasn't a R7 290 and an R9 290.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top