I have a GTX 780 as my primary card. I just found my gtx460 2win, (rare and cool) dual GPU card and threw it in. Each 460 core is getting 32k ppd.
But the 780 is only getting 56k PPD, when it use to burn 270k PPD (depending on WU)
I set the CPU to 8 threads, out of 12, and set advanced flags on all slots.
What could be causing this huge drop from the 780?? I should be totaling 360k PPD from all 4 clients.
Willing to try what ever, but may end up ripping this card out, and tossing it into another rig.
I have a GTX 780 as my primary card. I just found my gtx460 2win, (rare and cool) dual GPU card and threw it in. Each 460 core is getting 32k ppd.
But the 780 is only getting 56k PPD, when it use to burn 270k PPD (depending on WU)
I set the CPU to 8 threads, out of 12, and set advanced flags on all slots.
What could be causing this huge drop from the 780?? I should be totaling 360k PPD from all 4 clients.
Willing to try what ever, but may end up ripping this card out, and tossing it into another rig.
What are your GPU temps, maybe with the introduction of the GTX460, it caused the temp in the case to rise and possibly caused the 780 heat up to cause some instability and fall back to 2d clock speed. What does afterburner have to say about your 780?
No sir. the 780 is under a full cover water block. @ 1345mhz core the max temp. was 48°c.
I'm gonna let the card fold on it's own for a while and see if the PPD rises close to where it was. If so, then i think there is some type of driver conflict going on. The FAH7 client see 2 "GF104" and 1 "GK110". the problem is the GK110 is outputting 32k PPD, and the GF104 #2 GPU is doing the 78kPPD. I think there may be a hardware assignment problem with the Nvidia software (like there always has been) not seting the GPU number properly when it comes to addressing the GPU's
So I paused the 460 2win, and the PPD shot up to 240k PPD after 5 frames. I will be tossing this card into a stand alone rig. Gonna try and get it running for the Foldathon.
Would have been nice to have all my clients in one rig.. Oh well.
Unless someone else has other ideas, can you try reverting your drivers back to 327.xx at least for a few days. I would think that you will be close to 130K to 150K PPD
Unless someone else has other ideas, can you try reverting your drivers back to 327.xx at least for a few days. I would think that you will be close to 130K to 150K PPD
Let them run for a day or so at stock clocks - usually the initially PPD reported by the program is a little low. After about 5-10% you will see a more realistic PPD value.
Let them run for a day or so at stock clocks - usually the initially PPD reported by the program is a little low. After about 5-10% you will see a more realistic PPD value.
it's the only way to get QRB's, aka quick return bonuses.... Which will ramp up the amount of credit you get rather significantly. For example, I'm folding a P11423 work unit atm that gives a base credit of 12288. With a passkey and the quick return bonus (which is given out after you complete ten work units on a passkey, and then afterwards maintain an 80% completion ratio) HFM.NET is estimating I'll get 76,251.2 points. In this case, it's 6.2x the amount of points for doing the same amount of work.
It was basically a method brought in to help encourage people to do more work, as well as turn in work units faster.
Indeed, would have been nice to have known sooner, but I guess it's better late than never haha
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.2K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!