Originally Posted by m0uz
What a buzzkill
Originally Posted by Bucake
it's not a g302, look up a picture of one and compare.. buttons, sides, they are not the same.
can't tell if it has side-buttons. it probably does, but i hope it doesn't..
It's not a G302/3 because the buttons piece is longer.
Originally Posted by zeflow
The shape looks closer to the mx300/g100 shape. Its subtle but it's all we've been asking for.
I don't like the G100s shape. It's better for my grip than the G302/3, but the way I end up holding it (in-game) I might as well use a G303. The weight is the best thing about the G100s. The old OEM Logitech mice were a little better shaped than the G100s and the button piece was slightly better.
The scroll wheel position on the G302/3 and G100s is too far back. I wouldn't mind the length of those mice if the scroll wheel was further forward. The length of ZA13 is fine for me because the wheel is further forward.
I like a subtle shape that doesn't have uneven angles where you make contact with the finger tips. For instance, a WMO, Viper, Aurora, IMO and the "prototype" AM. I use tape on my mice to flatten out the thumb area and buttons to give me more stability/control.
I didn't like how the G302/3 and G100s main buttons felt straight after the apex. It feels like someone stuck a popsicle stick on the mouse for the buttons -- they don't follow the arch closely like a IMO. The same thing for the ZA, although that feels better in hand than than the G302/3 and G100s.
I did like the shape of the profile/CPI button of the G302/3. It didn't get in the way and I was still able to easily press it with the middle of my finger.Edited by popups - 6/25/16 at 3:21pm