Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › AMD/ATI › AMD RX 480 Review Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

AMD RX 480 Review Thread - Page 156

post #1551 of 3674
Quote:
Originally Posted by EightDee8D View Post

Actually, it's better to not believe anything. if some people even try to speculate saying lots of IF, some fake hypers start hyping and believing that as absolute truth.

that's why we have a situation like this. next time, nuke every freaking shed of hope you see and ban those fud/wccf like cancer sites. that will do good for everyone.

Well... WCCF was only wrong on power consumption. The card hits the stated OC targets with better cooling.
μRyzen
(12 items)
 
Mini Box
(4 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen R5 1400 MSI B350M Gaming Pro Zotac GTX 670 4GB G.SKILL FORTIS Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 
Hard DriveCoolingOSOS
WD Green 3tb Wraith Stealth Windows 10 Debian 8.7 
MonitorKeyboardPowerMouse
ViewSonic VX-2257-8 Chinese backlit mechanical Kingwin 850w Chinese laser optical 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Athlon 5350 Asus AM1I-A EVGA GTX 750 Ti SC 2x4GB DDR 3 1333 
  hide details  
Reply
μRyzen
(12 items)
 
Mini Box
(4 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen R5 1400 MSI B350M Gaming Pro Zotac GTX 670 4GB G.SKILL FORTIS Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 
Hard DriveCoolingOSOS
WD Green 3tb Wraith Stealth Windows 10 Debian 8.7 
MonitorKeyboardPowerMouse
ViewSonic VX-2257-8 Chinese backlit mechanical Kingwin 850w Chinese laser optical 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Athlon 5350 Asus AM1I-A EVGA GTX 750 Ti SC 2x4GB DDR 3 1333 
  hide details  
Reply
post #1552 of 3674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exeed Orbit View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by FLCLimax View Post

I don't doubt it, AMD gimped the reference card with that mid 90's heatsink. If i was in the market for mainstream i would boycott this card, lol. They gimped it hard in order to sell a more expensive version later along with AIB's. We have a perfectly good gpu that is held back by power, bad cooling and BIOS limits. They clearly mean to make a non handicapped Polaris GPU hence WattMan, price of entry 300 bucks.

You have to remember that AMD is not the one that gains with AIB surcharges. So saying that they gimped reference boards so that they can make more money with AIBs is kind of senseless.


They certainly gimped it to sell a more expensive design down the road though. This thing is locked up as tight as non-K intel CPU.
post #1553 of 3674
Quote:
Originally Posted by KarathKasun View Post

Well... WCCF was only wrong on power consumption. The card hits the stated OC targets with better cooling.
please, they were the one saying fury like performance on stock something like that.
post #1554 of 3674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exeed Orbit View Post

I stand corrected. The stage demo was indeed at 2100. It was the fanboys who started claiming that 2300+ should be easily attainable. Which again, reiterates my original point.

And you are a person that took that as fact obviously, or got confused or whatever happened. Yet you are here saying you're sick of hype and all that.

Ridiculous.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EightDee8D View Post

please, they were the one saying fury like performance on stock something like that.

IIRC that was the 1500mhz rumour and if you look at the german website OC results then it's actually not as far off as you'd think.
post #1555 of 3674
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLCLimax View Post

They certainly gimped it to sell a more expensive design down the road though. This thing is locked up as tight as non-K intel CPU.

Need to see what AIB's launch and for what prices. If I can get a RX 480 with windforce or similar cooler for $260, Im gonna be all over it.
μRyzen
(12 items)
 
Mini Box
(4 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen R5 1400 MSI B350M Gaming Pro Zotac GTX 670 4GB G.SKILL FORTIS Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 
Hard DriveCoolingOSOS
WD Green 3tb Wraith Stealth Windows 10 Debian 8.7 
MonitorKeyboardPowerMouse
ViewSonic VX-2257-8 Chinese backlit mechanical Kingwin 850w Chinese laser optical 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Athlon 5350 Asus AM1I-A EVGA GTX 750 Ti SC 2x4GB DDR 3 1333 
  hide details  
Reply
μRyzen
(12 items)
 
Mini Box
(4 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen R5 1400 MSI B350M Gaming Pro Zotac GTX 670 4GB G.SKILL FORTIS Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 
Hard DriveCoolingOSOS
WD Green 3tb Wraith Stealth Windows 10 Debian 8.7 
MonitorKeyboardPowerMouse
ViewSonic VX-2257-8 Chinese backlit mechanical Kingwin 850w Chinese laser optical 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Athlon 5350 Asus AM1I-A EVGA GTX 750 Ti SC 2x4GB DDR 3 1333 
  hide details  
Reply
post #1556 of 3674



Ok so we have to expect a RX 485?
Workstation
(4 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsMonitor
Xeon E5-2690 Supermicro 2011 Nvidia GP100/ Vega FE Dell ultrasharp 4k 
  hide details  
Reply
Workstation
(4 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsMonitor
Xeon E5-2690 Supermicro 2011 Nvidia GP100/ Vega FE Dell ultrasharp 4k 
  hide details  
Reply
post #1557 of 3674
Quote:
Originally Posted by KarathKasun View Post

Need to see what AIB's launch and for what prices. If I can get a RX 480 with windforce or similar cooler for $260, Im gonna be all over it.

Same here.
post #1558 of 3674
Quote:
Originally Posted by EightDee8D View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by KarathKasun View Post

Well... WCCF was only wrong on power consumption. The card hits the stated OC targets with better cooling.
please, they were the one saying fury like performance on stock something like that.

actually they said that for a mystical 8+6 pin variant @ 1500mhz that doesn't exist.
Edited by FLCLimax - 6/30/16 at 8:00am
post #1559 of 3674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waitng4realGPU View Post

And you are a person that took that as fact obviously, or got confused or whatever happened. Yet you are here saying you're sick of hype and all that.

Ridiculous.
I was mistaken in the number. But I never took the hype as fact. I'm well aware that marketing will take the best case scenario, and make it seem like the average use case (take CF 480 vs 1080 for example, on a single DX12 title, which has consistently favored AMD's architecture).
post #1560 of 3674
Quote:
Originally Posted by EightDee8D View Post

please, they were the one saying fury like performance on stock something like that.

AFAIK they were right, in some games its barely behind the Fury/X.

If 1450-1500 is doable on this reference design, it will approach Fury/X much more often with custom variants..
μRyzen
(12 items)
 
Mini Box
(4 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen R5 1400 MSI B350M Gaming Pro Zotac GTX 670 4GB G.SKILL FORTIS Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 
Hard DriveCoolingOSOS
WD Green 3tb Wraith Stealth Windows 10 Debian 8.7 
MonitorKeyboardPowerMouse
ViewSonic VX-2257-8 Chinese backlit mechanical Kingwin 850w Chinese laser optical 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Athlon 5350 Asus AM1I-A EVGA GTX 750 Ti SC 2x4GB DDR 3 1333 
  hide details  
Reply
μRyzen
(12 items)
 
Mini Box
(4 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen R5 1400 MSI B350M Gaming Pro Zotac GTX 670 4GB G.SKILL FORTIS Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 
Hard DriveCoolingOSOS
WD Green 3tb Wraith Stealth Windows 10 Debian 8.7 
MonitorKeyboardPowerMouse
ViewSonic VX-2257-8 Chinese backlit mechanical Kingwin 850w Chinese laser optical 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Athlon 5350 Asus AM1I-A EVGA GTX 750 Ti SC 2x4GB DDR 3 1333 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD/ATI
Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › AMD/ATI › AMD RX 480 Review Thread