Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › AMD/ATI › AMD RX 480 Review Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

AMD RX 480 Review Thread - Page 300

post #2991 of 3674
Quote:
Originally Posted by NuclearPeace View Post

Only 1,342 on the core from PC World. It seems like unless you go under water or luck out you aren't going to get more than 1,350 MHz out of the 480. PC world review said to also expect Nitros to hit selves a week from now.

Uh.. Not the case. All that's needed is voltage and power adjustments. I'm able to get 1425 to the core stable. I've benched and played games at 1405/2200.
post #2992 of 3674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackops_2 View Post

I assume this has already been posted?
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/RX_480_STRIX_OC/

not yet.

but wow, look at that temperature difference.


post #2993 of 3674
wow another week for aib 480's.... whyyyyy when gtx 1060 was on same day
Skylake 6700k
(5 items)
 
3770k ex-system
(14 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 3770K 4.5ghz 1.21v GA-Z77X-UD5H GeForce GTX 660 Ti WINDFORCE 2X OC 16GB Gskill Sniper 
Hard DriveCoolingPowerCase
M4 128gb SSD Hyper212+ Antec BP550 Plus CM Storm Enforcer 
  hide details  
Reply
Skylake 6700k
(5 items)
 
3770k ex-system
(14 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 3770K 4.5ghz 1.21v GA-Z77X-UD5H GeForce GTX 660 Ti WINDFORCE 2X OC 16GB Gskill Sniper 
Hard DriveCoolingPowerCase
M4 128gb SSD Hyper212+ Antec BP550 Plus CM Storm Enforcer 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2994 of 3674
Quote:
Originally Posted by epic1337 View Post

probably because AMD's GPUs are more inclined to be used as compute units.
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)


unlike compute workloads however, AMD's GPUs has issues when it comes to game workloads.

I asked you one thing.
Why is R9 380X still faster than R9 280X?
post #2995 of 3674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Themisseble View Post

I asked you one thing.
Why is R9 380X still faster than R9 280X?

clock speed, R9 380X is clocked higher than R9 280X.

plus, this implies that theres plenty of room in ROP throughput.
which is why they could squeeze in 12.5% more SPs without increasing ROP count in RX480, though they had to increase bandwidth.
Edited by epic1337 - 7/22/16 at 8:01am
post #2996 of 3674
Quote:
Originally Posted by epic1337 View Post

clock speed, RX 380X is clocked higher than R9 280X.
plus, this implies that theres plenty of room in ROP throughput.
The R9 380X is GCN 1.2, while the R9 280X is GCN 1.0
post #2997 of 3674
Quote:
Originally Posted by epic1337 View Post

clock speed, RX 380X is clocked higher than R9 280X.
plus, this implies that theres plenty of room in ROP throughput.

really?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDeHG4HCEVU
post #2998 of 3674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Themisseble View Post

really?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDeHG4HCEVU

you're contradicting yourself.
post #2999 of 3674
Quote:
Originally Posted by epic1337 View Post

you're contradicting yourself.

Me?

tell me why is R9 280X slower while having higher bandwidth? Can someone please explain this?
post #3000 of 3674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Themisseble View Post

Me?

tell me why is R9 280X slower while having higher bandwidth? Can someone please explain this?

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD/ATI
Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › AMD/ATI › AMD RX 480 Review Thread