Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [Various] Futuremark Releases 3DMark Time Spy DirectX 12 Benchmark
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Various] Futuremark Releases 3DMark Time Spy DirectX 12 Benchmark - Page 2

post #11 of 772
That's actually a really captivating scene. I like it.
post #12 of 772
mine won't install, also kinda mad that i have to repay for this test too
ivybeech
(21 items)
 
4K-HTPC
(12 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 6700k@4.7ghz Gigabyte z170xp-sli Nvidia GTX 1080Ti 16gb Team Xtreem DDR4 @16/18/18/37 3333mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
256gb M4 SSD boot 4TB Seagate - Raid 0 4TB Seagate - Raid 0 2TB Western Digital Green for storage 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
5TB Seagate 3 tb Seagate  2TB Seagate 4TB of various external storage 
CoolingOSMonitorMonitor
Corsair H100 in push/pull Windows 10 pro ASUS ROG Swift PG278Q 27" OC Catleap Q270SE IPS 2560x1440@120hz 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Xarmor mechanical cherry mx-brown Hale90 1000w 80+gold EVGA DG-87 Logitech G502 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5-2400 Intel DP67BG Nvidia GTX 950 8gb Gskill Ripjaws 1600mhz ddr3 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
256gb samsung SSD Asus Blu-ray Drive Model BC-12B1ST/BLK/B/AS Corsair H50 push/pull Windows 7 Professional 
MonitorPowerCase
Vizio m60-c3 - 3840x2160 OCZ ZT 750w Silverstone Grandia gd-05 
  hide details  
Reply
ivybeech
(21 items)
 
4K-HTPC
(12 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 6700k@4.7ghz Gigabyte z170xp-sli Nvidia GTX 1080Ti 16gb Team Xtreem DDR4 @16/18/18/37 3333mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
256gb M4 SSD boot 4TB Seagate - Raid 0 4TB Seagate - Raid 0 2TB Western Digital Green for storage 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
5TB Seagate 3 tb Seagate  2TB Seagate 4TB of various external storage 
CoolingOSMonitorMonitor
Corsair H100 in push/pull Windows 10 pro ASUS ROG Swift PG278Q 27" OC Catleap Q270SE IPS 2560x1440@120hz 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Xarmor mechanical cherry mx-brown Hale90 1000w 80+gold EVGA DG-87 Logitech G502 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5-2400 Intel DP67BG Nvidia GTX 950 8gb Gskill Ripjaws 1600mhz ddr3 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
256gb samsung SSD Asus Blu-ray Drive Model BC-12B1ST/BLK/B/AS Corsair H50 push/pull Windows 7 Professional 
MonitorPowerCase
Vizio m60-c3 - 3840x2160 OCZ ZT 750w Silverstone Grandia gd-05 
  hide details  
Reply
post #13 of 772
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orthello View Post

Someone get some Fury X numbers up please, and some 980 scores too .

1070 does better than i expected above vs 480 .. still 480 ahead of 970 by 17% in graphics score, looks like 980 could be ahead of 480.

Just spotted some 1440p numbers looks like 480 ahead of ref 980 by ~ 10% . Ref 480 14% behind Fury . AIB with small OC should be at Fury level i would pick. Just need the Fury X numbers.

Hm , curious to see the 980tis async result too ..

According to @Mahigan, nVidia's implementation gets bottlenecked the higher the resolution goes, or something along those lines. Let me find the quote, but his post explains the 1080p/1440p difference between the cards.

Here it is:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mahigan View Post

"As for nVIDIAs mythical driver... where is the Maxwell driver that nVIDIA said would enabled Async Compute? We are to believe that Pascal will get such a driver now as well?"

Oh and Pascal does not support Asynchronous Compute + Graphics. What Pascal supports is improved pre-emption coupled with Dynamic Load Balancing. Basically... attempting to run async compute + graphics will cut the Pascal GPU into little pieces (figuratively). What I mean is that the Pascal GPU is separated into GPC clusters. One cluster will handle the Graphics and an adjacent cluster will handle the compute. While one cluster is handling graphics... it cannot handle compute in parallel and vice versa. So if the GPCs are already busy then you will not get a performance boost (as seen under AotS at higher resolutions). At lower resolutions you might get a slight boost (tiny).

I will not hold my breath waiting on an nVIDIA driver to enable this feature (because you need a driver and code to enable it).

By this time next year... the FuryX may in fact be faster than a GTX 1070 in most of the newer titles... as has been the case for AMD GPUs for quite some time now. Even an R9 390x will be giving the GTX 1070 a run for its money as more and more titles optimize for these new APIs (DX12 and Vulkan).

This is sort of the trend since Tahiti.

Edited by Randomdude - 7/14/16 at 11:29am
Snappy
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-4790K 1.428V 4900MHz GA-Z97X-Gaming G1 WIFI-BK Sapphire R9 Fury X Corsair CMD16GX3M4A2133C9 Dominator Platinum 16... 
Hard DriveCoolingPowerCase
Sandisk Extreme Pro 240GB Corsair H110i GT Seasonic Platinum SS-760XP2 Cooler Master Storm Stryker 
MouseMouse Pad
Razer Mamba 4G 2012 Edition Genesis Soft Pad 
  hide details  
Reply
Snappy
(10 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-4790K 1.428V 4900MHz GA-Z97X-Gaming G1 WIFI-BK Sapphire R9 Fury X Corsair CMD16GX3M4A2133C9 Dominator Platinum 16... 
Hard DriveCoolingPowerCase
Sandisk Extreme Pro 240GB Corsair H110i GT Seasonic Platinum SS-760XP2 Cooler Master Storm Stryker 
MouseMouse Pad
Razer Mamba 4G 2012 Edition Genesis Soft Pad 
  hide details  
Reply
post #14 of 772
"By this time next year... the FuryX may in fact be faster than a GTX 1070 in most of the newer titles... as has been the case for AMD GPUs for quite some time now. Even an R9 390x will be giving the GTX 1070 a run for its money as more and more titles optimize for these new APIs (DX12 and Vulkan)."

I think Fury X owners will be pleased with the doom Vulkan release and with what i've seen apart from ROTR (dx12) they are right up there with 1070 in dx12 performance. Which is not really that surprising when you think a 1070 is only slightly faster than a 980 ti.

For me with the new API games/ports coming quicker than ever and the new 16nm cards dropping , even though i'm not buying its a really exciting time for GPUs. Time for AMD to shine also with all the async hardware they have built into their GPUs for years.
post #15 of 772
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orthello View Post

Someone get some Fury X numbers up please, and some 980 scores too .

1070 does better than i expected above vs 480 .. still 480 ahead of 970 by 17% in graphics score, looks like 980 could be ahead of 480.

Just spotted some 1440p numbers looks like ref 480 ahead of ref 980 by ~ 10% . Ref 480 14% behind Fury . AIB with small OC should be at Fury level i would pick. Just need the Fury X numbers.

Hm , curious to see the 980tis async result too ..

http://www.pcworld.com/article/3095301/components-graphics/3dmark-time-spy-tested-we-pit-radeon-vs-geforce-in-this-major-new-dx12-benchmark.html

Edit: Oh..i think you saw those test already.doh.gif
Edited by devilhead - 7/14/16 at 11:40am
post #16 of 772
Took them awhile. Now will wait and see what results reviewers will get.
Fluffy
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
R7 1700 MSI B350 Tomahawk ASUS Strix R9 380x Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Seagate SSHD 2TB Kingston SSD HyperX Fury 120GB LG DRW AMD Wraith Spire 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Windows 10 64-bit Home AOC AGON AG241QX Corsair CS650M Fractal Design Define R4 
  hide details  
Reply
Fluffy
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
R7 1700 MSI B350 Tomahawk ASUS Strix R9 380x Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Seagate SSHD 2TB Kingston SSD HyperX Fury 120GB LG DRW AMD Wraith Spire 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Windows 10 64-bit Home AOC AGON AG241QX Corsair CS650M Fractal Design Define R4 
  hide details  
Reply
post #17 of 772
HUZZAH. OC 290x bench inbound
Parasite
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 4770K @ 4.7GHz Z87 MPOWER (MS-7818) Sapphire Radeon 290x @1100/1500 EVGA 1080Ti SC2 Hybrid 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveCooling
G.SKILL 2133 Samsung 850 Pro Caviar Black Corsair H100 
CoolingCoolingOSMonitor
Corsair HG10 Corsair H60 Windows 7 x64 Sony XBR65X850B 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
CMSTORM Quickfire XT Corsair AX1200i Antec P280 Logitec G700 
Mouse PadAudio
Black, came with my NeXTcube 25 years ago. Sound Blaster Recon 3D PCIe 
  hide details  
Reply
Parasite
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 4770K @ 4.7GHz Z87 MPOWER (MS-7818) Sapphire Radeon 290x @1100/1500 EVGA 1080Ti SC2 Hybrid 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveCooling
G.SKILL 2133 Samsung 850 Pro Caviar Black Corsair H100 
CoolingCoolingOSMonitor
Corsair HG10 Corsair H60 Windows 7 x64 Sony XBR65X850B 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
CMSTORM Quickfire XT Corsair AX1200i Antec P280 Logitec G700 
Mouse PadAudio
Black, came with my NeXTcube 25 years ago. Sound Blaster Recon 3D PCIe 
  hide details  
Reply
post #18 of 772
I'm wondering why SLI receives such a small percentage compared to the single Pascal cards.
post #19 of 772
Quote:
Originally Posted by NightAntilli View Post

I'm wondering why SLI receives such a small percentage compared to the single Pascal cards.

Bridge SLI is not something that is native to DX12, Maybe DX12 Multi-adapter would have better async scaling than bridge SLI, just my guess.
Skylake 1080 FTW
(18 items)
 
XPS 15
(7 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-6700K  ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger EVGA 1080 FTW TridentZ DDR4-3000 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung SM951 128GB Samsung 840 Pro 256 GB Muskin Reactor 1TB Seagate Baracuda 2TB ST2000DM001 HDD 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Seagate Baracuda 2TB ST2000DM001 HDD Corsair H110i GT Windows 10 Pro  Acer XB321HK 32" 4K G-sync 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Corsair K70 Rapid Fire EVGA SuperNova 650 P2 NZXT H440 Black Logitech G900  
Mouse PadOther
Razer Vespula CyberPower CP1500PFCLCD - PFC Sinewave UPS Syst... 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-7700HQ 2.8Ghz(3.8Ghz Turbo) Dell XPS 15-9560 Nvidia GTX 1050 8GB DDR4-2400 
Hard DriveOSMonitor
256GB PCIE SSD Windows 10 Pro 15.6" 1080p 
  hide details  
Reply
Skylake 1080 FTW
(18 items)
 
XPS 15
(7 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-6700K  ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger EVGA 1080 FTW TridentZ DDR4-3000 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung SM951 128GB Samsung 840 Pro 256 GB Muskin Reactor 1TB Seagate Baracuda 2TB ST2000DM001 HDD 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Seagate Baracuda 2TB ST2000DM001 HDD Corsair H110i GT Windows 10 Pro  Acer XB321HK 32" 4K G-sync 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Corsair K70 Rapid Fire EVGA SuperNova 650 P2 NZXT H440 Black Logitech G900  
Mouse PadOther
Razer Vespula CyberPower CP1500PFCLCD - PFC Sinewave UPS Syst... 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-7700HQ 2.8Ghz(3.8Ghz Turbo) Dell XPS 15-9560 Nvidia GTX 1050 8GB DDR4-2400 
Hard DriveOSMonitor
256GB PCIE SSD Windows 10 Pro 15.6" 1080p 
  hide details  
Reply
post #20 of 772
Quote:
Originally Posted by infranoia View Post

HUZZAH. OC 290x bench inbound

Same here.

There's no thread in the Benchmarking Software and Discussion section yet?
DeskoSaurus X
(22 items)
 
It Does Stuff
(24 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
4790K 4.7 GHz Z97 MPOWER MAX AC 290X Lightning G. Skill TridentX 2x8GB 10-12-12 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingCooling
2x Crucial MX100 + 960GB M500 2x WD Blue RAID EK Supremacy EK-FC R9-290X Lightning 
CoolingCoolingCoolingOS
EK XE 480 + EK CoolStream PE 480 10x Phanteks + 2x Cougar Vortex MCP50X + MCP50X Windows 10 Pro 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
ViewSonic VX2250 22" LED Generic HP Corsair AX860i Lian-Li DK-Q2X 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Logitech G700 XTRAC Ripper TC Electronic Impact Twin Corsair Commander Mini 
OtherOther
Schiit Vali Kanto Yumi (Bamboo) 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX-8350 4.95GHz 24/7 GA-990FXA-UD3 Sapphire 7870 XT  Mushkin Redline 997051 @1866 8-8-8-24 1T 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Crucial Ballistix Tactical Tracer @1866 8-8-8-2... Black WD6401AALS 2x WD10EZEX Raid-0 EK Supremacy 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
10x Cougar Vortex PWM 3x Helix EK VGA Supremacy Acetal Alphacool NexXxos ST30 240mm, 2x XT45 240mm XSPC X2O 750 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Jingway DP-600 pump Windows 8.1 Pro x64 ViewSonic VX2250 22" LED Generic HP 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Rosewill HIVE-650 CM 690 II Advanced B&W  Logitech G700 Xonar DG 
AudioOtherOther
Tc Electronic Impact Twin Fan Controller: Aerocool X-Vision 2x Swiftech PWM Splitter 
  hide details  
Reply
DeskoSaurus X
(22 items)
 
It Does Stuff
(24 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
4790K 4.7 GHz Z97 MPOWER MAX AC 290X Lightning G. Skill TridentX 2x8GB 10-12-12 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingCooling
2x Crucial MX100 + 960GB M500 2x WD Blue RAID EK Supremacy EK-FC R9-290X Lightning 
CoolingCoolingCoolingOS
EK XE 480 + EK CoolStream PE 480 10x Phanteks + 2x Cougar Vortex MCP50X + MCP50X Windows 10 Pro 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
ViewSonic VX2250 22" LED Generic HP Corsair AX860i Lian-Li DK-Q2X 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Logitech G700 XTRAC Ripper TC Electronic Impact Twin Corsair Commander Mini 
OtherOther
Schiit Vali Kanto Yumi (Bamboo) 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX-8350 4.95GHz 24/7 GA-990FXA-UD3 Sapphire 7870 XT  Mushkin Redline 997051 @1866 8-8-8-24 1T 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Crucial Ballistix Tactical Tracer @1866 8-8-8-2... Black WD6401AALS 2x WD10EZEX Raid-0 EK Supremacy 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
10x Cougar Vortex PWM 3x Helix EK VGA Supremacy Acetal Alphacool NexXxos ST30 240mm, 2x XT45 240mm XSPC X2O 750 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Jingway DP-600 pump Windows 8.1 Pro x64 ViewSonic VX2250 22" LED Generic HP 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Rosewill HIVE-650 CM 690 II Advanced B&W  Logitech G700 Xonar DG 
AudioOtherOther
Tc Electronic Impact Twin Fan Controller: Aerocool X-Vision 2x Swiftech PWM Splitter 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [Various] Futuremark Releases 3DMark Time Spy DirectX 12 Benchmark