Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › [pcgames] Zen engineering samples in the wild. Units up to the 32 core are being tested.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[pcgames] Zen engineering samples in the wild. Units up to the 32 core are being tested. - Page 7

post #61 of 212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lex Luger View Post

Im pretty sure the 6950x uses the MCC die. This is proven by the fact it has a lower IPC than the 6 and 8 core variants.

You are right though that only the 8890 v4 has no cores disabled across the entire line of new xeons, which is garbage is my opinion. The only way you can get a chip without disabled cores is to spend the full 4000 dollars.

The i7-6950X definitely uses the LCC die. Its stepping is R0, which is the stepping for ALL LCC-based chips. If it were an MCC die, it would carry a stepping of M0. This is backed up on the ARK and in the Specification sheets for the i7-6950X.

The E7-8890 V4 is far more costly than $4000....it's a bit over $7000.
New Gamer
(12 items)
 
Beater
(10 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Core i7-6950X ASUS Rampage 10 Edition  NVidia Titan X Pascal NVidia Titan X Pascal 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
8x16GB Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR4-2800MHz Intel P3700 2TB Samsung SM961 1TB 2x Samsung PM1725 SSD 6.4TB (11.6TB Windows Sof... 
CoolingOSPowerCase
Corsair H110 2x140mm AIO water cooler Windows 7 Ultimate Corsair AX1500i Corsair Vengeance C70 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Xeon E5-1680 V3 Asrock X99E-itx/ac EVGA GeForce Titan X Superclocked 64GB (2x32GB) Crucial DDR4-2400 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 950 Pro 512GB Panasonic Slim Blu-ray Asetek 92mm AIO (w/Delta PWM fans push/pull) Windows 10 Professional 
PowerCase
Corsair SF600 NCase M1 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
2x Xeon E5-2687W V2 Asus Z9PE-D8 GeForce GTX Titan X (Maxwell) GeForce GTX Titan X (Maxwell) 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
256GB Samsung PC3-14900R LRDIMMs Intel P3700 2.0TB (NVMe boot) ASUS Blu-ray  2x Intel Retail LGA2011-3 HSF 
OSPowerCase
Windows Server 2012 Standard R2 Corsair AX1500i 1500W Chenbro SR10769 
  hide details  
Reply
New Gamer
(12 items)
 
Beater
(10 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Core i7-6950X ASUS Rampage 10 Edition  NVidia Titan X Pascal NVidia Titan X Pascal 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
8x16GB Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR4-2800MHz Intel P3700 2TB Samsung SM961 1TB 2x Samsung PM1725 SSD 6.4TB (11.6TB Windows Sof... 
CoolingOSPowerCase
Corsair H110 2x140mm AIO water cooler Windows 7 Ultimate Corsair AX1500i Corsair Vengeance C70 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Xeon E5-1680 V3 Asrock X99E-itx/ac EVGA GeForce Titan X Superclocked 64GB (2x32GB) Crucial DDR4-2400 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 950 Pro 512GB Panasonic Slim Blu-ray Asetek 92mm AIO (w/Delta PWM fans push/pull) Windows 10 Professional 
PowerCase
Corsair SF600 NCase M1 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
2x Xeon E5-2687W V2 Asus Z9PE-D8 GeForce GTX Titan X (Maxwell) GeForce GTX Titan X (Maxwell) 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
256GB Samsung PC3-14900R LRDIMMs Intel P3700 2.0TB (NVMe boot) ASUS Blu-ray  2x Intel Retail LGA2011-3 HSF 
OSPowerCase
Windows Server 2012 Standard R2 Corsair AX1500i 1500W Chenbro SR10769 
  hide details  
Reply
post #62 of 212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle View Post
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defoler View Post

Who doesn't understand?
The person who takes about a 1MHZ chip from the early 90s, and claims he understands how IPS works rolleyes.gif
Let alone multi threading and calculations as a whole.

That "last example" is kinda of a joke right? (talking about previously you attacking someone for "cherry picking"... rolleyes.gif)
Your 8320 has 8 cores and it gives less performance than a 2500K with 4.
And why its important that comparison?

Because the 8320 has the potential to push a 19K MIPS. That is 19,000 MILLIONS Instructions Per Second (if you didn't know what that means). And according to you, MIPS is the matter number.
The 2500K is almost 16K. Almost. Which means your CPU gives over 18% more IPS performance than a 2500K.
So you claim, that your CPU, should perform better, since after all, it has more MIPS, aka, more IPS.

This means that according to your example, the 8320 with its 8 core, should blow the 2500K out of the water right? Well guess again. The 2500K performs at stock(!) at a FX 9590. A CPU which gives 75% more IPS, and has 4 extra cores.

Just that blows your claims out of the water. IPS is meaningless in current games, and most likely in future games as well. This is not 1 core 1MHZ imaginary land. This is a 5ghz 8 core CPU being beat down by a 3.3ghz 4 core CPU land.
This is what IPC means. It means that you can get a hell of a lot more done out of less cores, less heat, and less core speed, and less cores. This is why IPC matters, and why IPS is a load of BS.

BTW, an i3 4130 performs as well as your FX8320 at stock in GTA5. Which kinda means you can settle for an i3-6100 which cost the same as the FX you have. You can even OC it to 4.4ghz+ and get the same performance as you CPU OCed. From a freakin 2 core 4 threads CPU running slower clocks, doing a hell of a lot less IPS.

Yes you can get an i7, but you also get a lot more stuff with it, including performance gain.

Anyway, I'm done with you on this thread. You clearly have no understanding, and start giving irrelevant comparisons.

You don't appear to have understood his post.

No, he didn't and he doesn't understand the difference between IPS and IPC. I clearly mentioned his CPU being clocked to 1MHz yet he's talking about 086 chips from the 90's. His emotionally charged posts leave me with a seriously big

 

CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 60

 

No point in continuing this discussion until he understands the difference between Instruction Per Clock (performance at equal MHz) and Instruction Per Second (IPC+clock speed) and stops talking about nonsense like MIPS in synthetic benchmarks.

 

I await Zen with anticipation and hope it's a good competitor to Intel's offering.

 

In the meantime I'm out. Good luck with this thread.

The girlfriend.
(15 items)
 
The Mistress
(13 items)
 
Media Server
(11 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
A8-6410 Lenovo Lancer 4B2 K16.3 R5 128 Shaders/M230 Hynix 8GB DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSMonitor
Samsung 840 120 GB SSD Seagate Momentus 1TB 5400rmp Win 8.1 CMN1487 TN LED 14" 1366*768 
KeyboardPowerMouseMouse Pad
Lenovo AccuType 2900mAh/41Wh Elan Trackpad/Logitech M90 Super Flower 
Audio
AMD Avalon(Connexant) 
  hide details  
Reply
The girlfriend.
(15 items)
 
The Mistress
(13 items)
 
Media Server
(11 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
A8-6410 Lenovo Lancer 4B2 K16.3 R5 128 Shaders/M230 Hynix 8GB DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSMonitor
Samsung 840 120 GB SSD Seagate Momentus 1TB 5400rmp Win 8.1 CMN1487 TN LED 14" 1366*768 
KeyboardPowerMouseMouse Pad
Lenovo AccuType 2900mAh/41Wh Elan Trackpad/Logitech M90 Super Flower 
Audio
AMD Avalon(Connexant) 
  hide details  
Reply
post #63 of 212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defoler View Post

The 2500K is almost 16K. Almost. Which means your CPU gives over 18% more IPS performance than a 2500K.
So you claim, that your CPU, should perform better, since after all, it has more MIPS, aka, more IPS.

This means that according to your example, the 8320 with its 8 core, should blow the 2500K out of the water right? Well guess again. The 2500K performs at stock(!) at a FX 9590. A CPU which gives 75% more IPS, and has 4 extra cores.
Hi.
Quote:
In this test we encode a h.264 DTS 1080P trailer of 150 MB to Matroska x.264 with 5.1 channels AC3. We use the Handbrake software suite heavily threaded, the more processor cores it sees, the faster it can and will transcode. This software is perfect for benchmarking the CPU and memory.



i5 2500k = 16,32fps
i7 2600k = 21,41fps
i5 3570k = 20,15fps
i7 3770k = 24,71fps
fx 8350 = 24,76fps


The last 8core amd pushed, was in 2012, those are its competitors, it wasn't slower in video encoding and/or multithreaded apps, it was just more power hungry.
Power consumption was always the issue with bulldozer architecture, it wasn't performance, that's why amd doesnt bother making 8core SR/EV, if they consumed <100W it would be a whole different story.
AT THE TIME it was a very good choice if you didnt care about power, but here you are, arguing about ~4 year old tech
Edited by Marios145 - 7/21/16 at 8:31am
post #64 of 212
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperZan View Post

FWIW, my FX-8370 and my 6700k are essentially indistinguishable without measuring whilst gaming in UHD. Even then, it's been demonstrated before that at 1440p the FX disadvantage is much smaller and at 2160p it's not worth mentioning. That doesn't mean that I'm recommending an older platform, it's just a fallacy to assume that you need Intel's single-thread performance advantage at all times in every gaming scenario.

I'd say that for my purposes, the FX series does shine in performance/£ whilst waiting for Zen and Skylake-e as viable replacements for my various systems.

Gamers seem to be enthusiasts, and enthusiasts like new & shiny, and Zen has certainly drummed up a good bit of enthusiasm, but would a gaming system be the place for a Zen? Or maybe it's just timing. I bought an 8 core Intel chip because of the promises of DX12 utilizing multi core CPUs, a year later and it hasn't happened. Maybe Zen will spur the developers into finally unleashing that portion of the DX12 feature set where Intel chips couldn't. That said, I couldn't go back to a quad core chip, I like what the extra 4 do, and I bet a bunch of new Zen users will, too. thumb.gif
X-Rig
(14 items)
 
Death Bomb
(9 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
I7-5960X Asus Rampage V Extreme 1502 EVGA Titan X EVGA Titan X 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
G.Skill F4-3000C15Q-32GRK Samsung SM951 M.2 Samsung 850 Pro 512GB Pioneer BDR-2209 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
EKWB Blocks, Fans, and Pumps, HW Labs Black Ice... Windows 10 Pro Retail BenQ BL3201PH Max Keyboard Nighthawk X8 
PowerMouse
EVGA 220-P2-1200-X1 Roccat Kone Pure Optical 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
I7-7700K De-lidded @ 5GHz Asus Strix Z270i Nvidia Titan Xp G. Skill F4-3600C15D-16GTZ 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
2X Samsung 960 Pro 512GB M.2 EK Supremacy EVO CPU. Titan Xp Full Cover w/Ba... Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit SeaSonic X750 
Case
Fractal Nano S 
  hide details  
Reply
X-Rig
(14 items)
 
Death Bomb
(9 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
I7-5960X Asus Rampage V Extreme 1502 EVGA Titan X EVGA Titan X 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
G.Skill F4-3000C15Q-32GRK Samsung SM951 M.2 Samsung 850 Pro 512GB Pioneer BDR-2209 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
EKWB Blocks, Fans, and Pumps, HW Labs Black Ice... Windows 10 Pro Retail BenQ BL3201PH Max Keyboard Nighthawk X8 
PowerMouse
EVGA 220-P2-1200-X1 Roccat Kone Pure Optical 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
I7-7700K De-lidded @ 5GHz Asus Strix Z270i Nvidia Titan Xp G. Skill F4-3600C15D-16GTZ 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
2X Samsung 960 Pro 512GB M.2 EK Supremacy EVO CPU. Titan Xp Full Cover w/Ba... Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit SeaSonic X750 
Case
Fractal Nano S 
  hide details  
Reply
post #65 of 212
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucethemoose View Post

Quote:
The most interesting part of the report though stems from the idle performance of the Zen chips. They are reported to idle with a clockspeed of just 550MHz delivering a low power state of 2.5W and 5W for the quad and octo-core CPUs. That’s a seriously low idle power, especially given that AMD’s previous CPU architecture draws some 30W even at idle. The Core i7-6700K looks pretty good at around 3.5W, but Zen’s quad-core chip might even better that.

My llano laptop chip from 2011 idles at 400mhz. I havent measured power usage, and I'm sure it doesn't have the C-State magic that Zen and newer Intel chips do, but it'll idle forever on battery with the screen off.

Meanwhile if I put my Lenovo Flex 2 14 with a i5 4210U to sleep over the weekend, the battery will be dead on the Monday.
Power Bac G5
(6 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel i7 6950X EVGA GTX 1080 Ti GSkill 32GB 4133Mhz Samsung 960 Pro 1TB 
CoolingMonitor
Corsair H110i ASUS PG278Q 
  hide details  
Reply
Power Bac G5
(6 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel i7 6950X EVGA GTX 1080 Ti GSkill 32GB 4133Mhz Samsung 960 Pro 1TB 
CoolingMonitor
Corsair H110i ASUS PG278Q 
  hide details  
Reply
post #66 of 212
Quote:
Originally Posted by epic1337 View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clocknut View Post

nope nope nope. If it is sandy bridge IPC, that 8 core will need to sell at $200.

go tell that to newegg.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117263

Wise comparison.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA1UH3Z95804&cm_re=amd_opteron-_-19-113-318-_-Product
Power Bac G5
(6 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel i7 6950X EVGA GTX 1080 Ti GSkill 32GB 4133Mhz Samsung 960 Pro 1TB 
CoolingMonitor
Corsair H110i ASUS PG278Q 
  hide details  
Reply
Power Bac G5
(6 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel i7 6950X EVGA GTX 1080 Ti GSkill 32GB 4133Mhz Samsung 960 Pro 1TB 
CoolingMonitor
Corsair H110i ASUS PG278Q 
  hide details  
Reply
post #67 of 212
I hope those clock speeds aren't final. Assuming Haswell IPC, Haswell still has a base clock of 4GHZ boost 4.4. Base 2.8 and boost 3.2 isn't going to cut it even if it has twice as many cores.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Biostar X370GTN MSI GTX 1070 Quick Silver OC G.Skill TridentZ 32GB (2x 16GB) DDR4-3200 
Hard DriveCoolingMonitorKeyboard
Samsung 960 EVO 500GB Cryorig C7 ASUS VG278HV Unicomp Classic 104 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair SF600 DAN CASE A4-SFX Zowie EC1-A White Icemat 2nd Edition White 
Audio
Audioengine A5+ 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Biostar X370GTN MSI GTX 1070 Quick Silver OC G.Skill TridentZ 32GB (2x 16GB) DDR4-3200 
Hard DriveCoolingMonitorKeyboard
Samsung 960 EVO 500GB Cryorig C7 ASUS VG278HV Unicomp Classic 104 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair SF600 DAN CASE A4-SFX Zowie EC1-A White Icemat 2nd Edition White 
Audio
Audioengine A5+ 
  hide details  
Reply
post #68 of 212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gah Duma View Post

I hope those clock speeds aren't final. Assuming Haswell IPC, Haswell still has a base clock of 4GHZ boost 4.4. Base 2.8 and boost 3.2 isn't going to cut it even if it has twice as many cores.

I don't think you can measure speed that way. 1ghz on an AMD chip isn't the same thing on an Intel chip.
Big Timmah
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 5 1600 Asrock x370 Killer SLI/AC Sapphire Radeon Nitro Fury CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 16GB 3200mhz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
PNY 480GB SSD PH-TC12DX Black Windows 10 Pro LG 29inch Ultrawide 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Corsair K70 Thermaltake SMART M Series 850W NZXT S340 White Steel ATX Mid Tower Case Wireless Logitech thing 
Mouse Pad
With a supple pad  
  hide details  
Reply
Big Timmah
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 5 1600 Asrock x370 Killer SLI/AC Sapphire Radeon Nitro Fury CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 16GB 3200mhz 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
PNY 480GB SSD PH-TC12DX Black Windows 10 Pro LG 29inch Ultrawide 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Corsair K70 Thermaltake SMART M Series 850W NZXT S340 White Steel ATX Mid Tower Case Wireless Logitech thing 
Mouse Pad
With a supple pad  
  hide details  
Reply
post #69 of 212
Quote:
Originally Posted by lutjens View Post

The i7-6950X definitely uses the LCC die. Its stepping is R0, which is the stepping for ALL LCC-based chips. If it were an MCC die, it would carry a stepping of M0. This is backed up on the ARK and in the Specification sheets for the i7-6950X.

Yep, this does appear to be the case.

Some pre-release rumors implied the MCC die, and Intel has used MCC dies for engineering samples of LCC parts, but the release chips are on the LCC die.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robenger View Post

I don't think you can measure speed that way. 1ghz on an AMD chip isn't the same thing on an Intel chip.

He included the qualifier of Haswell IPC, which has been long rumored. If the IPC is known, all you need is number of cores and clock speed to get a rough idea of how parts compare.

However, we really don't have any solid idea of either final clocks nor real IPC when it comes to Zen, yet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lex Luger View Post

To top it off, these are the bad chips they didnt make the grade for the Xeons, so we are getting nothing but leftovers chips. Thats why so many cores are disabled.

A defect that requires a core to be disabled doesn't imply anything about the quality of the rest of the silicon.
Primary
(15 items)
 
Secondary
(13 items)
 
In progress
(10 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
5820K @ 4.2/3.5GHz core/uncore, 1.175/1.15v Gigabyte X99 SOC Champion (F22n) Gigabyte AORUS GTX 1080 Ti (F3P) @ 2025/1485, 1... 4x4GiB Crucial @ 2667, 12-12-12-28-T1, 1.34v 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Plextor M6e 128GB (fw 1.06) M.2 (PCI-E 2.0 2x) 2x Crucial M4 256GB 4x WD Scorpio Black 500GB Noctua NH-D15 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 Professional x64 SP1 BenQ BL3200PT Filco Majestouch Tenkeyless (MX Brown) Corsair RM1000x 
CaseMouseAudio
Fractal Design Define R4 Logitech G402 Realtek ALC1150 + M-Audio AV40 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
X5670 @ 4.4/3.2GHz core/uncore, 1.36 vcore, 1.2... Gigabyte X58A-UD5 r2.0 w/FF3mod10 BIOS Sapphire Fury Nitro OC+ @ 1053/500, 1.225vGPU/1... 2x Samsung MV-3V4G3D/US @ 2000, 10-11-11-30-T1,... 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
1x Crucial BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0 @ 2000, 10-11-11-3... OCZ (Toshiba) Trion 150 120GB Hyundai Sapphire 120GB 3x Hitachi Deskstar 7k1000.C 1TB 
CoolingOSPowerCase
Noctua NH-D14 Windows 7 Pro x64 SP1 Antec TP-750 Fractal Design R5 
Audio
ASUS Xonar DS 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-6800K @ 4.3/3.5GHz core/uncore, 1.36/1.2v ASRock X99 OC Formula (P3.10) GTX 780 (temporary) 4x4GiB Crucial DDR4-2400 @ 11-13-12-28-T2, 1.33v 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Intel 600p 256GB NVMe 2x HGST Travelstar 7k1000 1TB Corsair H55 (temporary) Windows Server 2016 Datacenter 
PowerCase
Seasonic SS-860XP2 Corsair Carbide Air 540 
  hide details  
Reply
Primary
(15 items)
 
Secondary
(13 items)
 
In progress
(10 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
5820K @ 4.2/3.5GHz core/uncore, 1.175/1.15v Gigabyte X99 SOC Champion (F22n) Gigabyte AORUS GTX 1080 Ti (F3P) @ 2025/1485, 1... 4x4GiB Crucial @ 2667, 12-12-12-28-T1, 1.34v 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Plextor M6e 128GB (fw 1.06) M.2 (PCI-E 2.0 2x) 2x Crucial M4 256GB 4x WD Scorpio Black 500GB Noctua NH-D15 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 Professional x64 SP1 BenQ BL3200PT Filco Majestouch Tenkeyless (MX Brown) Corsair RM1000x 
CaseMouseAudio
Fractal Design Define R4 Logitech G402 Realtek ALC1150 + M-Audio AV40 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
X5670 @ 4.4/3.2GHz core/uncore, 1.36 vcore, 1.2... Gigabyte X58A-UD5 r2.0 w/FF3mod10 BIOS Sapphire Fury Nitro OC+ @ 1053/500, 1.225vGPU/1... 2x Samsung MV-3V4G3D/US @ 2000, 10-11-11-30-T1,... 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
1x Crucial BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0 @ 2000, 10-11-11-3... OCZ (Toshiba) Trion 150 120GB Hyundai Sapphire 120GB 3x Hitachi Deskstar 7k1000.C 1TB 
CoolingOSPowerCase
Noctua NH-D14 Windows 7 Pro x64 SP1 Antec TP-750 Fractal Design R5 
Audio
ASUS Xonar DS 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-6800K @ 4.3/3.5GHz core/uncore, 1.36/1.2v ASRock X99 OC Formula (P3.10) GTX 780 (temporary) 4x4GiB Crucial DDR4-2400 @ 11-13-12-28-T2, 1.33v 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Intel 600p 256GB NVMe 2x HGST Travelstar 7k1000 1TB Corsair H55 (temporary) Windows Server 2016 Datacenter 
PowerCase
Seasonic SS-860XP2 Corsair Carbide Air 540 
  hide details  
Reply
post #70 of 212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gah Duma View Post

I hope those clock speeds aren't final. Assuming Haswell IPC, Haswell still has a base clock of 4GHZ boost 4.4. Base 2.8 and boost 3.2 isn't going to cut it even if it has twice as many cores.

Zambezi and Vishera ESs were 3.0-3.2GHz on a pretty mature node. Retail base clocks for Summit Ridge will most definitely be higher than 2.8. My guess is ~3.4 base, ~3.7 all core boost, and ~4.0 max boost, but we'll see.
SPEAR
(22 items)
 
Laptop #3
(7 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k @ 4.2ghz ASRock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3 Gigabyte WF3 Radeon R9 270X x2 G.Skill Ripjaws X 4x4gb @ 1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
OCZ Agility 3 120gb (Linux) OCZ Agility 3 120gb (Windows) WD Caviar Black 2tb Hitachi 500gb 
Optical DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Sony Optiarc LightScribe LaCie external BluRay writer Antec Kühler H2O 920 + Corsair SP120 P/P Arch Linux + radeonsi + E20 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 Pro (Insider release) ASUS VS238H-V @ 70hz Corsair K90 Corsair TX750 V2 
CaseMouseAudioAudio
None CM Storm Recon Altec Lansing ATP3 Creative Aurvana Live! 
OtherOther
Masscool Shin-Etsu G751 ASUS PCE-N10 
CPUGraphicsGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 4980HQ @ 2.8/4.0GHz Intel Iris Pro 5200 AMD Radeon R9 M370X 2x8GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz 
Hard DriveOSMonitor
1TB PCIe SSD OS X 10.11.2 El Capitan 15" @ 2880x1800 
  hide details  
Reply
SPEAR
(22 items)
 
Laptop #3
(7 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k @ 4.2ghz ASRock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3 Gigabyte WF3 Radeon R9 270X x2 G.Skill Ripjaws X 4x4gb @ 1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
OCZ Agility 3 120gb (Linux) OCZ Agility 3 120gb (Windows) WD Caviar Black 2tb Hitachi 500gb 
Optical DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Sony Optiarc LightScribe LaCie external BluRay writer Antec Kühler H2O 920 + Corsair SP120 P/P Arch Linux + radeonsi + E20 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 Pro (Insider release) ASUS VS238H-V @ 70hz Corsair K90 Corsair TX750 V2 
CaseMouseAudioAudio
None CM Storm Recon Altec Lansing ATP3 Creative Aurvana Live! 
OtherOther
Masscool Shin-Etsu G751 ASUS PCE-N10 
CPUGraphicsGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 4980HQ @ 2.8/4.0GHz Intel Iris Pro 5200 AMD Radeon R9 M370X 2x8GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz 
Hard DriveOSMonitor
1TB PCIe SSD OS X 10.11.2 El Capitan 15" @ 2880x1800 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › [pcgames] Zen engineering samples in the wild. Units up to the 32 core are being tested.