Originally Posted by danjal
Heres as close as I can get with the comparison screens.. I had to set my in game fov to like 80.. I guess dice changed the map or something because the shipping containers are missing, unless he was on a tdm match and I'm doing conquest for the screenshots (edited in, hes in conquest also, noticed that comparing them)..
made some edits, added more specs.
I'm around 130+fps with an I5email@example.com, 16gb gskill ddr4-3000, zotac 1070 with a mild overclock, 32" Crossover 32s monitor at 2560x1440p overclocked to 75hz. . Default ultra settings, just fov changed to match rdr09's, Origin default install no shader mods... cpu temp at 51c, gpu at 65c, and that is where tops out at, I dont recall seeing it over 65c all aircooled.
Great work, however I don't believe that screenshot belongs to rdr, I saw the same one a day before, I believe it's pulled off the net. Not 100% sure anyway. The more important thing - it is obviously a different version of the game, therefore comparison is irrelevant - they updated a lot of objects on the map, trees, fences and whatnots, they may or may not have updated textures or filtering.
The left image looks a bit better to me, but that may be due to 4K vs 1440p, or due to the changes in the game, who knows.
We need someone with an AMD GPU to take the same shot right now, on the same version of the map, preferably at 1440p, so we can compare.
But again, kudos for putting the effort into it