Originally Posted by Fragil1ty
I recently received the G403, but I'm not a fan of the overall shape it just feels a little too big for me, so I've ordered a G Pro instead.
What are the current issues w/ the G Pro? Is it just the overly light clicks for some people?
Ok let's be perfectly honest here. After testing both mice extensively for the past days, despite shape being personal i can say that:
G403 is superior to G pro in every given aspect. Unless one have very small hands or simply small hands and playing with very low sens, G403 has:
- Far better stability
- Alot easier to aim with
- Just as fast as the G pro, despite being alot larger (which to me was really surprising. It could be due to the worthless skates provided with the G pro though which really slows it down)
-The shape with the narrowed down sides is very evident after a while, that it's simply not good in certain conditions which makes a much more forced aim than with the G403. You will miss certain shots you normally wouldn't due to this factor alone.
It's beyond me why Logitech decided to angle the sides the way they did instead of keeping it simple like G1 with straight sides or simply a softer incline. Obviously the reason behind it is to keep the buttom of the mouse as small as possible for faster turns but it's beyond me why they diden't follow e.g Abyssus v.1 sollution where they kept the base tiny without impacting the sides at the same time --> http://i66.tinypic.com/2ic1ik5.png
While G pro is good and you can do well, it's not a natural flow when you play with it. Again, for anyone with medium to large hands, G403 is superior. Everything you thought you did well with the G pro, you can do just as good and even better with the G403 and with much less effort in the process. G pro is imo a bit too heavy as well. Such a mouse should not be over 80g, but rather 75. In any case, G pro is indeed good, but not as good as the hype would suggest.Edited by Karz - 9/29/16 at 10:51am