Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Mice › [Sponsored] Logitech G Pro Gaming Mouse Review - by Ino
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Sponsored] Logitech G Pro Gaming Mouse Review - by Ino - Page 59

post #581 of 3553
Do you guys hve any picture to compare this with steelseries sensei? Using g502 currently but it is abit heavy.
post #582 of 3553
Quote:
Originally Posted by trism View Post

Nah. At least the current one is a decent average... something I could probably get used to. Would have preferred G100s' sensor position. I prefer the Rival 100 shape over G100s anyways and the sensor position is just better so I think this will not be the "final" mouse (lol) for me.

Current sensor position is good since it has a ghost curve at the butt.
post #583 of 3553
What difference does the sensor position make? Shouldn't the tracking be the same, only relative to a different starting point?
post #584 of 3553
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nilizum View Post

Current sensor position is good since it has a ghost curve at the butt.

No idea what you mean with ghost curve. G Pro has a bit wider butt so the sensor goes even further up while gripped than just what the absolute sensor position delta shows when compared to the G100s. The sensor position with G100s is approximately the same as with Rival 100 in my grip.
post #585 of 3553
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisXIV View Post

What difference does the sensor position make? Shouldn't the tracking be the same, only relative to a different starting point?

Well tracking quality does not obviously change, no one claimed that.

But think about it or test it yourself: squeeze a pencil between the tips of your index and middle fingers and put your hand on a paper. Rotate your wrist from maximum left to maximum right while drawing a curve to the paper. Do the same again by squeezing the pencil close to the palm. Measure the curves.

You cannot compensate this distance difference by changing the sensitivity unless you play strictly by using the rotation from your wrist. If you combine shoulder, elbow and wrist movement, the sensor position plays a big role in how it feels. I'm used to ~G100s position and for my personal aimstyle, it just feels better. I noticed this when I used the original FK (high sensor position) for over a year and I played better with Kinzuadder almost immediately after switching, not even needing really any transition time. Same for KPM (high sensor position) -> Rival 100. Immediately better results in tracking. And I really like the FK shape so I doubt it's because a non-compatible shape.

What I am really saying is that a lower sensor position allows me to play with a higher overall sensitivity while having increased wrist control accuracy. I track with wrist, turn with elbow and shoulder. The closer the sensor is to the wrist, the more wrist rotation is required for same amount of angular rotation in-game. Wrist sensitivity, if you will. biggrin.gif
Edited by trism - 8/22/16 at 1:16am
post #586 of 3553
So you mean the arc of a circle (pi*r*(alpha/180°)) that is achievable with a certain radius, starting from the carpus?
post #587 of 3553
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisXIV View Post

So you mean the arc of a circle (pi*r*(alpha/180°)) that is achievable with a certain radius, starting from the carpus?

You can put it that way, yes.

I have to add that I've already played FPS shooters for 20ishs years so I am old (still a youngster for some people) and it takes too much time to learn new things nowadays when it comes to dexterity redface.gif
Edited by trism - 8/22/16 at 1:22am
post #588 of 3553
Understood, thanks for the explanation!
post #589 of 3553
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisXIV View Post

What difference does the sensor position make? Shouldn't the tracking be the same, only relative to a different starting point?
Well manly it makes a feeling difference between circular wrist moves and linear hand moves, furter rearward - cicular moves cause a smaller translation vector (that's actually obvious) but (imo), it makes you feel like u've got a better control.
Edited by drewno - 8/22/16 at 2:24am
post #590 of 3553
Quote:
Originally Posted by mitavreb View Post

I'm gonna wait for the feedback from people who use an ergo and palm grip if it's possible to switch to this mouse.

I'll let you know, I have a feeling the ec from zowie or even the g900 from Logitech will be much better shapes.. but I won't count it out yet. Using the g303 I'm struggling so hard to track aim which I can do with ease with an EC/g900.. flicking and stuff I'm nuts with but when it comes to following a fast target precisely I just can't do it without my palm having contact/control on the rear end of a mouse

I'm not sure if my desk height and arm rest on my chair come into play either but that's how I feel.. wonder if a higher sensitivity with these small mice is the answer? Idk really but again I'll let you know
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Mice
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Mice › [Sponsored] Logitech G Pro Gaming Mouse Review - by Ino