Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Mice › [Sponsored] Logitech G Pro Gaming Mouse Review - by Ino
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Sponsored] Logitech G Pro Gaming Mouse Review - by Ino - Page 78

post #771 of 3549
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demi9OD View Post

Yeah if you really want to talk about awkward sensor positioning...

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/optical-mice,381-7.html

I used one of those for at least a year. Must have been playing CS 1.1 or 1.3 back then.

That was my first optical mouse too and it was awesome. But now the sides are kind of melting and feel extremely sticky and that residue is disgusting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conditioned View Post


I was kinda hoping for a more expanded explanation from ino to confirm/deny a theory of mine but whatever ;-)

What do you want to know? More detailed questions get more detailed answers. Those are my reason, comfort and performance are better for me with ambi.
Fast enough
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 6600k ASUS Z170 Pro Palit GeForce GTX 980 Ti 16 GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung Spinpoint F1 Samsung Spinpoint F1 Samsung SSD 750 EVO Alpenföhn Groß Clock'ner 
OSMonitorKeyboardCase
Windows 7 x64 BenQ XL2411 Lioncast LK20 Sharkoon Rebel9 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitech G Pro Zowie G-SR Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium PCI-Express 
  hide details  
Reply
Fast enough
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 6600k ASUS Z170 Pro Palit GeForce GTX 980 Ti 16 GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung Spinpoint F1 Samsung Spinpoint F1 Samsung SSD 750 EVO Alpenföhn Groß Clock'ner 
OSMonitorKeyboardCase
Windows 7 x64 BenQ XL2411 Lioncast LK20 Sharkoon Rebel9 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitech G Pro Zowie G-SR Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium PCI-Express 
  hide details  
Reply
post #772 of 3549
Quote:
Originally Posted by LikesToSlide View Post

I kept going back and forth and finally decided to cancel my pre-order for this, in favor of using my current g400, because
  1. g400 and g100s shape both feel ok to me.
  2. g400 latency 0.7ms < 5ms
  3. $88

I'm going to keep waiting for my dream mouse- g400 shape <90g with PWM3366 sensor.
you're saying g400 has .7ms latency and g pro has 5 ms, what? its also 70 not 88
post #773 of 3549
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldc0ffee View Post

All this pro player talk. No wonder companies talk about their products being designed by pros and stuff. There needs to be a new forum called fan boys.

Yeah it's pretty cringey. I just assume they are really young.


Someone mentioned shipping details; has the Pro shipped from Logitech eDirect pre-orders? Amazon?
post #774 of 3549
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan Nails View Post

you're saying g400 has .7ms latency and g pro has 5 ms, what?

Yeah according to the table from this post: link and Ino's review that says it's almost identical latency to g900.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan Nails View Post

its also 70 not 88

+tax+shipping
NoSATA
(9 items)
 
  
MotherboardGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD5 Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1 Gaming Corsair Samsung 950 Pro M.2 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
Corsair H100i v2 Windows 10 Acer 27" 144Hz Seasonic X=650 
Case
Antec P280 
  hide details  
Reply
NoSATA
(9 items)
 
  
MotherboardGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD5 Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1 Gaming Corsair Samsung 950 Pro M.2 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
Corsair H100i v2 Windows 10 Acer 27" 144Hz Seasonic X=650 
Case
Antec P280 
  hide details  
Reply
post #775 of 3549
Quote:
Originally Posted by LikesToSlide View Post

Yeah according to the table from this post: link and Ino's review that says it's almost identical latency to g900.
+tax+shipping
newegg is shipping/tax free, amazon has only tax. im assuming you mean logitech site u dont have to buy it there
post #776 of 3549
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan Nails View Post

you're saying g400 has .7ms latency and g pro has 5 ms, what? its also 70 not 88

I had the feeling they were gong to try to charge $80 for it until people started to complain. $70 is a reasonable early adopter price.
post #777 of 3549
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan Nails View Post

you're saying g400 has .7ms latency and g pro has 5 ms, what? its also 70 not 88

I think he is talking about click latency. All logitech mice after the G402 and G502 have increased click latency and apparently newer firmwares for those 2 mice have higher click latency.
post #778 of 3549
Quote:
Originally Posted by popups View Post


I wonder if Jordan is sticking with the G100s because of muscle memory. Skadoodle switched, it appears he improved afterwards.

Btw here's n0thing's 15 second "review" of the g pro:


@02:16:18

https://www.twitch.tv/n0thingtv/v/85482111?t=2h16m18s
Edited by maddada - 8/25/16 at 7:03pm
post #779 of 3549
Quote:
Originally Posted by maddada View Post

Btw here's n0thing's 15 second "review" of the g pro:


@02:16:18

https://www.twitch.tv/n0thingtv/v/85482111?t=2h17m18s

Your link is 2:17:18.
post #780 of 3549
Said he doesn't use it 'yet'
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Mice
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Mice › [Sponsored] Logitech G Pro Gaming Mouse Review - by Ino