Originally Posted by TopGunSF
Aye, I refuse to touch a 16:9 - absolutely useless for working, which it will be used for as well. I'd rather continue on with the dying monitor.
Futile to pursue or even think about ever again in your life. Fan of 16:10 myself and all i've used this century till now, but it's a dying to basically dead. You can go on and hold your breath for it, though you'll probably be dead for eternity and it will still never happen.
Similar things to your request would be a Dell 30". Your response time requirement will not be met, there are no 16:10 2-3ms monitors today, i don't actually recall there ever being one (non crt) that ever existed. Closest to that is a 4k Tn Panel, still 16:9, but if that's not enough productivity space you need more than one monitor. There is also 38" 21:9 coming at 1600p tall, though not with that response time. But discounting 1440p at 27" for a 1200p is illogical. It's still more hor and vert usable space than 1200p so there is no reason at all to settle for 1200p at this point all things being equal, which they are not since a lot of the 27" 1440 have faster response time than any 1200p and not only that but the image is much more crisp than a 24" 1200p monitor.