We test at Ultra quality settings. Your sweet spot might be high quality and 1080P if you have less then 3GB of graphics memory. 3GB graphics memory (often referred to as VRAM) really is a sweet-spot for the game. For PC gaming your goal always should be 60+ FPS. However, we say 40~45 FPS for a game of this type should be your threshold, while 60 FPS (frames per second) or higher can be considered optimal.
RX 480 beating Fury cards, Titan X (Maxwell) and 1070? I can understand Fury cards are lagging behind due to VRAM limitation, but what is the deal with the Nvidia GPUs?
390 has 256 less shading units, but that should not be 20 fps difference. More benchmarks should be done with this game, current results break any consistency seen with other games so far.
Lol those guru3d benches are obviously a bunch of bull. I mean rx470 4GB beating a R9 Nano ? 390X wrecking the GTX 1080 ? I trust PCGH. Gotta say the 390X looks good anyway, and there is something weird going on with this game..... 980 runs it pretty well but 980Ti can't ?
Lol those guru3d benches are obviously a bunch of bull. I mean rx470 4GB beating a R9 Nano ? 390X wrecking the GTX 1080 ? I trust PCGH. Gotta say the 390X looks good anyway, and there is something weird going on with this game..... 980 runs it pretty well but 980Ti can't ?
I had no issue running locked 60fps on my sig rig at 4k ultra settings in the demo from steam. With vsync off, FPS was in the 70's so there is something wrong here.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.2K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!