"Overclock is no problem at all. Though we can not say a certain frequency due to NDA, I can say that it is impressive. Overclockers will be happy."
"I have friends from AMD Engineering department due to my experience in the hardware industry. Zen 2 or Zen B will be even more competitive. So we can say that Intel shall brood on the future" "With our overclocked 1800x sample,under Noctua cooler given by AMD, we have passed beyond the stock single thread performance of 7700k, in a specific bench, and the temps were great. We had no concern about temps during our run which passes the ST performance of 7700k."
"In some benchmarks AMD(!). It seems ironical yes but AMD is presenting a CPU performance that Intel can not keep up with even with their 10 core 6950x!"
"Breaking NDA won't be a problem since the scores are beyond fantastic. But we will stick with the tradition."
"With one click I can reach great OC's. So I won't really bother with the manual OC no more."
"Single thread score will be so great. According to this performance we can say that 7700K will be history, even for gaming, from now on" he said.
"Intel shall shake themself. Because Ryzen will be a great choice for Overclock enthusiast."
1800X despite its DDR4 microcode bug, and only a single tower Noctua cooler, has impressive overclock that was able to beat 6950X in some benchmarks! Can you say
Let Intel use of cheap thermo paste come back and haunt them.
1800X despite its DDR4 microcode bug, and only a single tower Noctua cooler, has impressive overclock that was able to beat 6950X in some benchmarks! Can you say
Let Intel use of cheap thermo paste come back and haunt them.
Unfortunately the only thing stopping me from going Ryzen right is the crap mATX motherboard selection. For my particular use case I need 2 slot spacing SLI support, which as of now does not appear to exist since every mATX board only has x4 speeds on the second x16 slot. I'm gonna end up on X79 for another 5 years at this pace.
...wth? Their "single threaded IPC" isnt beating KBL at the same clock from what I have seen.. its actually clocking single thread faster than the turbo boost frequency is set to.
**Anyone else seeing this? This is placebo clocks !! not real performance !! Reminds me of Intel Z77 launch and "media boost" ROFL
I don't think anyone actually wants Ryzen to fail in any way. AMD owners are happy for the huge bump in performance and Intel owners are glad they don't have to continue being milked by the Intel monopoly.
...wth? Their "single threaded IPC" isnt beating KBL at the same clock from what I have seen.. its actually clocking single thread faster than the turbo boost frequency is set to.
**Anyone else seeing this? This is placebo clocks !! not real performance !! Reminds me of Intel Z77 launch and "media boost" ROFL
...wth? Their "single threaded IPC" isnt beating KBL at the same clock from what I have seen.. its actually clocking single thread faster than the turbo boost frequency is set to.
**Anyone else seeing this? This is placebo clocks !! not real performance !! Reminds me of Intel Z77 launch and "media boost" ROFL
Ryzen is boosting beyond advertised/set boost frequency
pretty sure its related to their XFR which is doing some TDP monitoring and supply telemetry to cores for operation..there are tons of sensors on these die. Either way.. you cant count on the CPU freq boosting to set freq.. it moves based on the workload, not # of cores
That's why it needs to hit at least 4.6 because the ipc difference is around 5-10 %. With this way it will match the IPS of the 7700k based on the workflow.
But ipc changes based on workflow so sometimes the ryzen could be faster.
I think the real star for AMD from this arch should be Naples. AMD is not going to survive by selling these CPU's to consumers. The real honey pot is in corporate sales.
ryzen needs 400mhz more to match intel. so 4.9 make more sense? point is the youtube video says it matched 7700k on one test. what would it take for ryzen to match 7700k when overclocked 4.9? 4.6 might be enough to match 6700k.
I think the real star for AMD from this arch should be Naples. AMD is not going to survive by selling these CPU's to consumers. The real honey pot is in corporate sales.
I think I speak for everyone here in that if an 1800X can reach 4.4-4.5 Ghz overclocking on air, we will have a winner for sure. Anything higher than that is icing on the cake.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.2K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!