Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › [Official] RYZEN 7 1800X | 1700X |1700 Owners Club & 4GHz+ Club
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Official] RYZEN 7 1800X | 1700X |1700 Owners Club & 4GHz+ Club - Page 457

post #4561 of 11486
Quote:
Originally Posted by bardacuda View Post

http://asrock.pc.cdn.bitgravity.com/Manual/X370%20Killer%20SLIac.pdf

Section 2.3, page 25. For any type of pair it is expecting A2+B2 to be the first two populated, then A1+B1 only if you have 4 DIMMS. Whether it's single rank or double rank only seems to matter if you have 1 pair of each.

I see, i shall move them over then lol. I dont see it written on there a2+b2 should be populated first, but i will take your word for it smile.gif

Im mostly just wanting it to be in the correct slots when/if xmp profiles get fixed.

Thanks.
Ryzen 1700
(8 items)
 
Steve
(5 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.8@1.248 Asrock Killer x370 SLI/AC EVGA GTX 1060 SSC 6gb Gskill ripjaws 3200 cas 16 
Hard DriveCoolingPowerCase
Seagate firecuda 1tb AMD Wraith Spire RGB EVGA 650 GQ NZXT H440 Matte Black 
  hide details  
Reply
Ryzen 1700
(8 items)
 
Steve
(5 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.8@1.248 Asrock Killer x370 SLI/AC EVGA GTX 1060 SSC 6gb Gskill ripjaws 3200 cas 16 
Hard DriveCoolingPowerCase
Seagate firecuda 1tb AMD Wraith Spire RGB EVGA 650 GQ NZXT H440 Matte Black 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4562 of 11486
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty99 View Post

I see, i shall move them over then lol. I dont see it written on there a2+b2 should be populated first, but i will take your word for it smile.gif

Im mostly just wanting it to be in the correct slots when/if xmp profiles get fixed.

Thanks.



^ This. If you have a single DIMM, it goes in A2. A single pair, it goes in A2+B2. Two pairs, if they are differing rank, the dual ranked pair goes in A2+B2 and the single ranked pair goes in A1+B1. There is no case in that diagram where A1+B1 is populated and A2+B2 is empty.
post #4563 of 11486
Quote:
Originally Posted by MNMadman View Post

Your second set of criteria should have "core parking disabled everything 100%". 0% says that every core can be parked. The higher the percent, the less cores that can be parked.

On Ryzen R7, 0% means 15 cores can be parked (can't park all 16 cores), 25% means 12 cores can be parked, 50% means 8 cores can be parked, 75% means 4 cores can be parked, 100% means 0 cores can be parked.

Thanks to this thread, I have mine set manually to 50% so it will park the virtual cores and leave the physical cores unparked.

ok, so, gaming wise is this better than completely unparked or what?
     
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen R7 1700x Gigabyte Aorus AX370 Gaming 5 ASUS GTX 1080 Turbo @ 2050mhz G.Skill DDR4 16GB 8GBx2 3200 mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung 750 Evo 250GB Crucial m500 960GB OCZ Trion 150 960GB Samsung 960 Evo 1TB m.2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
WD Green 6TB DVD drive Corsair H60 2013 edition windows 10 home 
MonitorPowerCaseMouse
32inch Crossover 4K Thermaltake SMART M series 750W Powerspec G418 case Thermal 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
i7 4910mq GTX 880m (GK104 with 8GB VRAM) 16 GB DDR3 3x Samsung 840 EVO in RAID 0 (1.31 TB total) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung M9T 2TB HDD Bluray/DVD drive Bluray/DVD drive Window 7 Home Premium 
MonitorPower
Panasonic 2880x1620 panel 180w Delta brick 
  hide details  
Reply
     
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen R7 1700x Gigabyte Aorus AX370 Gaming 5 ASUS GTX 1080 Turbo @ 2050mhz G.Skill DDR4 16GB 8GBx2 3200 mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung 750 Evo 250GB Crucial m500 960GB OCZ Trion 150 960GB Samsung 960 Evo 1TB m.2 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
WD Green 6TB DVD drive Corsair H60 2013 edition windows 10 home 
MonitorPowerCaseMouse
32inch Crossover 4K Thermaltake SMART M series 750W Powerspec G418 case Thermal 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
i7 4910mq GTX 880m (GK104 with 8GB VRAM) 16 GB DDR3 3x Samsung 840 EVO in RAID 0 (1.31 TB total) 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung M9T 2TB HDD Bluray/DVD drive Bluray/DVD drive Window 7 Home Premium 
MonitorPower
Panasonic 2880x1620 panel 180w Delta brick 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4564 of 11486
Quote:
Originally Posted by bardacuda View Post



^ This. If you have a single DIMM, it goes in A2. A single pair, it goes in A2+B2. Two pairs, if they are differing rank, the dual ranked pair goes in A2+B2 and the single ranked pair goes in A1+B1. There is no case in that diagram where A1+B1 is populated and A2+B2 is empty.

I see it now, confusing graph lol. +rep
Ryzen 1700
(8 items)
 
Steve
(5 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.8@1.248 Asrock Killer x370 SLI/AC EVGA GTX 1060 SSC 6gb Gskill ripjaws 3200 cas 16 
Hard DriveCoolingPowerCase
Seagate firecuda 1tb AMD Wraith Spire RGB EVGA 650 GQ NZXT H440 Matte Black 
  hide details  
Reply
Ryzen 1700
(8 items)
 
Steve
(5 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.8@1.248 Asrock Killer x370 SLI/AC EVGA GTX 1060 SSC 6gb Gskill ripjaws 3200 cas 16 
Hard DriveCoolingPowerCase
Seagate firecuda 1tb AMD Wraith Spire RGB EVGA 650 GQ NZXT H440 Matte Black 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4565 of 11486
Quote:
Originally Posted by budgetgamer120 View Post

The Division has free trial up to leve 8. So i downloaded it and ran bench. My 2.4ghz Xeon games great, Ryzen should be much better.

Ryzen not being good at gaming is clearly false.

benchmark is done on all High no AA


What GPU you got? With gtx 1060 6gb and 1700 clocked at all core 3.7ghz my benchmark scores were

Avg fps: 78.2
Typ FPS: 79.0
Avg CPU: 30%
Avg GPU: 97%
Ryzen 1700
(8 items)
 
Steve
(5 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.8@1.248 Asrock Killer x370 SLI/AC EVGA GTX 1060 SSC 6gb Gskill ripjaws 3200 cas 16 
Hard DriveCoolingPowerCase
Seagate firecuda 1tb AMD Wraith Spire RGB EVGA 650 GQ NZXT H440 Matte Black 
  hide details  
Reply
Ryzen 1700
(8 items)
 
Steve
(5 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.8@1.248 Asrock Killer x370 SLI/AC EVGA GTX 1060 SSC 6gb Gskill ripjaws 3200 cas 16 
Hard DriveCoolingPowerCase
Seagate firecuda 1tb AMD Wraith Spire RGB EVGA 650 GQ NZXT H440 Matte Black 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4566 of 11486
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChronoBodi View Post

ok, so, gaming wise is this better than completely unparked or what?
According to other peoples' testing, core parking will make it so there is less resource contention in lightly-threaded situations (i.e. most games). Less contention generally means better performance.
TT Green
(22 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 6600K LGA 1151 ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Gene mATX EVGA GTX1080 FTW Hydro Copper 8GB PCIe G.Skill F4-3600C16-16GTZR 2x8GB DDR4 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingCooling
Samsung 960 Pro 2TB NVMe SSD Toshiba X300 4TB 7,200RPM SATA HDD EKWB EK-XRES 140 Revo D5 PWM Reservoir/Pump Combo EKWB EK-Coolstream PE 240 Radiator 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
EKWB EK-Coolstream PE 360 Radiator EKWB EK-UNI Pump Bracket (120mm Fan) Vertical EKWB EK-ACF 10/16mm Black Fittings (10) Thermaltake Riing 120 RGB LED Fans (6) 
CoolingCoolingOSMonitor
PrimoChill PrimoFlex Adv. LRT Crystal Clear Tubing Thermaltake Coolant UV Green Windows 10 Pro x64 Creator Edition Acer XB270HU bprz 27" 1440p 144Hz G-Sync 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Corsiar Gaming STRAFE RGB USB SeaSonic Platinum SS-660XP2 660W ATX Thermaltake Core P5 Green Edition ATX Corsair Gaming SABRE RGB Optical USB 
Mouse PadAudio
Corsair Gaming MM400 High Speed Compact Edition Corsair Gaming VOID RGB 7.1HD USB 
  hide details  
Reply
TT Green
(22 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 6600K LGA 1151 ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Gene mATX EVGA GTX1080 FTW Hydro Copper 8GB PCIe G.Skill F4-3600C16-16GTZR 2x8GB DDR4 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingCooling
Samsung 960 Pro 2TB NVMe SSD Toshiba X300 4TB 7,200RPM SATA HDD EKWB EK-XRES 140 Revo D5 PWM Reservoir/Pump Combo EKWB EK-Coolstream PE 240 Radiator 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
EKWB EK-Coolstream PE 360 Radiator EKWB EK-UNI Pump Bracket (120mm Fan) Vertical EKWB EK-ACF 10/16mm Black Fittings (10) Thermaltake Riing 120 RGB LED Fans (6) 
CoolingCoolingOSMonitor
PrimoChill PrimoFlex Adv. LRT Crystal Clear Tubing Thermaltake Coolant UV Green Windows 10 Pro x64 Creator Edition Acer XB270HU bprz 27" 1440p 144Hz G-Sync 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Corsiar Gaming STRAFE RGB USB SeaSonic Platinum SS-660XP2 660W ATX Thermaltake Core P5 Green Edition ATX Corsair Gaming SABRE RGB Optical USB 
Mouse PadAudio
Corsair Gaming MM400 High Speed Compact Edition Corsair Gaming VOID RGB 7.1HD USB 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4567 of 11486
Quote:
Originally Posted by MNMadman View Post

According to other peoples' testing, core parking will make it so there is less resource contention in lightly-threaded situations (i.e. most games). Less contention generally means better performance.


So in reality even OCed people should be running it at 0%. Unless this seems to work better for stock speeds because of xfr. In amds testing they found that high perf gave better fps then balanced
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
R7 1700X asus crosshair 6 Sapphire R9 390 Nitro CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingCooling
Kingston HyperX 3K Seagate ST2000DM006 EKWB Supremacy Evo EK-XRES 100 Revo D5 - Acetal 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
Alphacool GPX r9 390 m01 alphacool xt45 240 Alphacool xt45 360 Alphacool D5 PWM 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 LG 29UM68 Corsair Strafe Corsair RM1000 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Thermaltake X5 Corsair M65 Pro RGB Razer Goliathus Speed 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
R7 1700X asus crosshair 6 Sapphire R9 390 Nitro CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingCooling
Kingston HyperX 3K Seagate ST2000DM006 EKWB Supremacy Evo EK-XRES 100 Revo D5 - Acetal 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
Alphacool GPX r9 390 m01 alphacool xt45 240 Alphacool xt45 360 Alphacool D5 PWM 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 LG 29UM68 Corsair Strafe Corsair RM1000 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Thermaltake X5 Corsair M65 Pro RGB Razer Goliathus Speed 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4568 of 11486
Quote:
Originally Posted by navjack27 View Post

f**k yeah 18k

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/18669216?

I AM THE RYZEN MASTER

my cpu cooler is reallllly holding me back. NZXT get ur crap together with ur CLC provider already and get those brackets out!

bunny, don't trust cpu-z at all! cuz according to it right now...
Are there differences in core temp parked vs unmarked during those runs? If you could post screen shots of the cpu temp graphs during those runs I'd like to see them.
Ryzen Shine!
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1800X @ 4125mhz 1.432 Volts MSI X370 Titanium   Fury  G.SKILL TridentZ Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) 288-Pin... 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 850 pro Hp 1260 I liquid unobtanium Koolance 480mm radiator, 39... Win 7 HP/Winspy 10 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
24" hp @ 1900x1200 Logitech G19 PC power and cooling 910 watt silencer Thermaltake P5 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech MX 518 fUnc industries 
  hide details  
Reply
Ryzen Shine!
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 1800X @ 4125mhz 1.432 Volts MSI X370 Titanium   Fury  G.SKILL TridentZ Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) 288-Pin... 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 850 pro Hp 1260 I liquid unobtanium Koolance 480mm radiator, 39... Win 7 HP/Winspy 10 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
24" hp @ 1900x1200 Logitech G19 PC power and cooling 910 watt silencer Thermaltake P5 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech MX 518 fUnc industries 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4569 of 11486
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperZan View Post

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
To elaborate on the above, the stress test in Y-Cruncher should by default reserve as much memory as is available so when it runs the various instruction-sets and workloads, your system will be tested for stability in the CPU as well as interaction with memory and cache. One run will generally show any glaring instability and five runs will generally reveal any subtle instability which may come back to haunt you later.

I've yet to pass five or more runs of Y-Cruncher stress test and fail any subsequent stability test or suffer from system instability or data corruption later. This has been true of AM3+, FM2+, Z170, Z97, and X79 so I expect nothing different from AM4.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mus1mus View Post

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Just to add, X99. It's overkill for the platform, but hey, Stable. thumb.gif
Just open the app, press 1 to cue the stability suite, press 0 to start.

The test will run each subtest for 2 minutes, 5 sets will be around an hour or so. 3 sets will actually be enough as this is rather very quick to detect instability. Only FFT doesn't stress Ryzen.

For reference, minute memory instability may cause the app to finish one set but not the 2nd or the 3rd. Even long term Memory stress testing can be omitted if you pass 5 sets of y-cruncher.

That's just my experience. thumb.gif

Edit: 5 sets can also detect Vcore deficiency on the stability front. This causes Ryzen systems to restart though testing passes short duration runs.

+rep, guys thumb.gif . I went nuts with Y-Cruncher yesterday evening smile.gif . I found same settings as x264 for sufficient for Y-Cruncher. Runs ~5°C hotter than x264/RB/f@h, but still super quiet fan profile smile.gif . RB for me needs less voltage than x264/Y-Cruncher and shows instability only after longer time than x264/Y-Cruncher.

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)




Only thing is I still get core crash on f@h frown.gif . In chronological order.

My base 3.8GHz OC 2133MHz used +106.25mV (~1.319V on DMM) for x264, etc. Repeatedly tested in x264/RB/f@h and no issues. I upped VCORE to +112.5V when I went 2400MHz RAM and left SOC [AUTO] it shot from ~0.838V on DMM to ~1.050V.

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
f@h 16/03/17 evening, (3.8GHz OC 2400MHz VCORE +112.5mV (~1.330V on DMM) SOC: [AUTO]).





f@h 17/03/17 morning (3.8GHz OC 2400MHz VCORE +112.5mV (~1.330V on DMM) SOC: [AUTO]).




Due to the errors on L0 cache I went and lowered SOC to 0.950V, upped VCORE to +118.75mV. As thought perhaps CPU doesn't like high SOC and need some more VCORE. Through out the day no issues on f@h. Tested with Y-Cruncher as shown above screenies.

This morning (3.8GHz OC 2400MHz VCORE +118.75mV SOC: 0.950V).

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)


So what you reckon guys, SOC or VCORE need increase? I'm currently testing lowered SOC again. 3.8GHz OC 2400MHz VCORE +118.75mV SOC: 0.925V.
Edited by gupsterg - 3/18/17 at 4:40am
XPS - R7 1700
(14 items)
 
XPS - i5 4690K
(12 items)
 
XPS - Q6600
(8 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 7 1700 Asus Crosshair VI Hero Sapphire Fury X@1145/545 G.Skill Trident Z 2x 8GB 3200MHz C14 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
Samsung Evo 840 ThermalRight Archon IB-E X2 + 2x TY143 ThermalRight TY-143 2x front case intake Arctic Cooling F12 + 2x F9 as rear case exhaust 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 Pro x64 Asus MG279Q Cherry MX-Board 3.0 Cooler Master V850 
CaseMouse
SilverStone TJ06 Logitech G700S 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 4690K@4.9GHz 1.255V Asus Maximus VII Ranger Sapphire Fury X@1145/545 HyperX Savage 2x8GB 2400MHz C11 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung Evo 840 TR Archon SB-E X2 Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 x64 Asus MG279Q 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Cherry MX-Board 3.0 Cooler Master V850 SilverStone TJ06 Logitech G700S 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Q6600 G0 Asus P5K Premium Black Pearl Sapphire Toxic HD5850 Corsair Dominator 4GB 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
Crucial MX 100 256GB TR TRUE Rev.A Win 7 Pro x64 Cooler Master V650 
  hide details  
Reply
XPS - R7 1700
(14 items)
 
XPS - i5 4690K
(12 items)
 
XPS - Q6600
(8 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 7 1700 Asus Crosshair VI Hero Sapphire Fury X@1145/545 G.Skill Trident Z 2x 8GB 3200MHz C14 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
Samsung Evo 840 ThermalRight Archon IB-E X2 + 2x TY143 ThermalRight TY-143 2x front case intake Arctic Cooling F12 + 2x F9 as rear case exhaust 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 Pro x64 Asus MG279Q Cherry MX-Board 3.0 Cooler Master V850 
CaseMouse
SilverStone TJ06 Logitech G700S 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 4690K@4.9GHz 1.255V Asus Maximus VII Ranger Sapphire Fury X@1145/545 HyperX Savage 2x8GB 2400MHz C11 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung Evo 840 TR Archon SB-E X2 Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 x64 Asus MG279Q 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Cherry MX-Board 3.0 Cooler Master V850 SilverStone TJ06 Logitech G700S 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Q6600 G0 Asus P5K Premium Black Pearl Sapphire Toxic HD5850 Corsair Dominator 4GB 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
Crucial MX 100 256GB TR TRUE Rev.A Win 7 Pro x64 Cooler Master V650 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4570 of 11486
Highest performing $330 CPU ever?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD CPUs
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › [Official] RYZEN 7 1800X | 1700X |1700 Owners Club & 4GHz+ Club