Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › [Official] RYZEN 7 1800X | 1700X |1700 Owners Club & 4GHz+ Club
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Official] RYZEN 7 1800X | 1700X |1700 Owners Club & 4GHz+ Club - Page 892

post #8911 of 11544
my system becomes strange now.. I have low DPC on previous setup (before RMA) and now I got awfully high DPC exceeding 2000! the culprit is storport. wth is that?
Pinkybeast
(19 items)
 
Mobility
(6 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X PRIME X370-PRO Sapphire RX 480 Nitro+ 4GB G-Skill F4-2400C15-16GVR 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung 950 Pro 512GB M.2 Western Digital WD4004FZWX Seagate ST3500418AS Toshiba MK5059GSXP 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 Asus BW-16D1HT Noctua NH-U12P SE2 Microsoft Windows 10 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
LG IPS LED 22MP68 generic Corsair CX600 BeQuiet Dark Base 900 Pro 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitech G402 Corsair MM300 Parasound Z-DAC v.2 
CPURAMHard DriveOS
AMD A6-5350M Patriot DDR3 1600 Sandisk SSD 64GB Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 
MonitorCase
17" HP Pavilion 17 e011nr 
  hide details  
Reply
Pinkybeast
(19 items)
 
Mobility
(6 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X PRIME X370-PRO Sapphire RX 480 Nitro+ 4GB G-Skill F4-2400C15-16GVR 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung 950 Pro 512GB M.2 Western Digital WD4004FZWX Seagate ST3500418AS Toshiba MK5059GSXP 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 Asus BW-16D1HT Noctua NH-U12P SE2 Microsoft Windows 10 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
LG IPS LED 22MP68 generic Corsair CX600 BeQuiet Dark Base 900 Pro 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitech G402 Corsair MM300 Parasound Z-DAC v.2 
CPURAMHard DriveOS
AMD A6-5350M Patriot DDR3 1600 Sandisk SSD 64GB Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 
MonitorCase
17" HP Pavilion 17 e011nr 
  hide details  
Reply
post #8912 of 11544
Quote:
Originally Posted by lightofhonor View Post

Weird since 2.0 says agesa 1.0.0.4a

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty99 View Post

Its not, that was added later and not sure why. If you look in aida you can see what agesa version they are.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lightofhonor View Post

I did add the Fail_CNT and ProcODT settings for memory. I think those are associated with 1.0.0.4a

Maybe AIDA just reads it wrong?

Fail_CNT and ProcODT only appeared on C6H with AGESA 1.0.0.4a.

Perhaps the AGESA string they forgot to update. On C6H we don't get that info yet redface.gif , only SMU FW / Microcode versions redface.gif , down to how Asus are doing the ROM redface.gif .

*** edit ***

Seems on new they have sorted string issue.



Below left AGESA 1.0.0.4a with new SMU FW / Microcode, right older ROM.


Edited by gupsterg - 4/14/17 at 10:51am
XPS - R7 1700
(14 items)
 
XPS - i5 4690K
(12 items)
 
XPS - Q6600
(8 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 7 1700 Asus Crosshair VI Hero Sapphire Fury X@1145/545 G.Skill Trident Z 2x 8GB 3200MHz C14 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
Samsung Evo 840 ThermalRight Archon IB-E X2 + 2x TY143 ThermalRight TY-143 2x front case intake Arctic Cooling F12 + 2x F9 as rear case exhaust 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 Pro x64 Asus MG279Q Cherry MX-Board 3.0 Cooler Master V850 
CaseMouse
SilverStone TJ06 Logitech G700S 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 4690K@4.9GHz 1.255V Asus Maximus VII Ranger Sapphire Fury X@1145/545 HyperX Savage 2x8GB 2400MHz C11 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung Evo 840 TR Archon SB-E X2 Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 x64 Asus MG279Q 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Cherry MX-Board 3.0 Cooler Master V850 SilverStone TJ06 Logitech G700S 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Q6600 G0 Asus P5K Premium Black Pearl Sapphire Toxic HD5850 Corsair Dominator 4GB 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
Crucial MX 100 256GB TR TRUE Rev.A Win 7 Pro x64 Cooler Master V650 
  hide details  
Reply
XPS - R7 1700
(14 items)
 
XPS - i5 4690K
(12 items)
 
XPS - Q6600
(8 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 7 1700 Asus Crosshair VI Hero Sapphire Fury X@1145/545 G.Skill Trident Z 2x 8GB 3200MHz C14 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
Samsung Evo 840 ThermalRight Archon IB-E X2 + 2x TY143 ThermalRight TY-143 2x front case intake Arctic Cooling F12 + 2x F9 as rear case exhaust 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 Pro x64 Asus MG279Q Cherry MX-Board 3.0 Cooler Master V850 
CaseMouse
SilverStone TJ06 Logitech G700S 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 4690K@4.9GHz 1.255V Asus Maximus VII Ranger Sapphire Fury X@1145/545 HyperX Savage 2x8GB 2400MHz C11 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung Evo 840 TR Archon SB-E X2 Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 x64 Asus MG279Q 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Cherry MX-Board 3.0 Cooler Master V850 SilverStone TJ06 Logitech G700S 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Q6600 G0 Asus P5K Premium Black Pearl Sapphire Toxic HD5850 Corsair Dominator 4GB 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
Crucial MX 100 256GB TR TRUE Rev.A Win 7 Pro x64 Cooler Master V650 
  hide details  
Reply
post #8913 of 11544
Quote:
Originally Posted by gupsterg View Post

No idea to all 3?

I have mainly gone about profiling 2 R7 1700 I had for OC'ing and stability testing. They both did 3.8GHz with similar VCORE and 3.9GHz. 3.9GHz too high a VCORE for 24/7 use IMO. What VCORE I need for 3.9GHz stable in ~10x x264 loops is stable for 4.0GHz CB15 benches I did as one offs, not tested anything else.

MemTweakIt on the page I grabbed whilst doing the CB15 benches I did yesterday does not highlight Asus "Secret Sauce".



I just played around with the various PB settings. I was mainly looking for changes in Latency and memory speed. I was just using the simple benchmark tests in SIV to get some numbers. I thought that MAYBE there might be some advantage to using the AIDA/GeekBench PB profile as it MIGHT have produced a very small decrease in memory latency. But after testing multiple times and actually looking at task completion times, I finally drummed up any perceived performance improvement simply to measurement error. I have gone back to the basic Auto setting and will leave it there.
post #8914 of 11544
So what's the max OC on the 1700? 4.0ghz?
post #8915 of 11544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Myers View Post

I just played around with the various PB settings. I was mainly looking for changes in Latency and memory speed. I was just using the simple benchmark tests in SIV to get some numbers. I thought that MAYBE there might be some advantage to using the AIDA/GeekBench PB profile as it MIGHT have produced a very small decrease in memory latency. But after testing multiple times and actually looking at task completion times, I finally drummed up any perceived performance improvement simply to measurement error. I have gone back to the basic Auto setting and will leave it there.

CB15 with PB set in UEFI consistently gives improved performance. Not tested other stuff yet.


UEFI 0079 4.0GHz 3200MHz C14 with CB PB (Click to show)


UEFI 0081 4.0GHz 3200MHz C14 without CB PB (Click to show)


UEFI 0081 4.0GHz 3200MHz C14 with CB PB (Click to show)
XPS - R7 1700
(14 items)
 
XPS - i5 4690K
(12 items)
 
XPS - Q6600
(8 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 7 1700 Asus Crosshair VI Hero Sapphire Fury X@1145/545 G.Skill Trident Z 2x 8GB 3200MHz C14 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
Samsung Evo 840 ThermalRight Archon IB-E X2 + 2x TY143 ThermalRight TY-143 2x front case intake Arctic Cooling F12 + 2x F9 as rear case exhaust 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 Pro x64 Asus MG279Q Cherry MX-Board 3.0 Cooler Master V850 
CaseMouse
SilverStone TJ06 Logitech G700S 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 4690K@4.9GHz 1.255V Asus Maximus VII Ranger Sapphire Fury X@1145/545 HyperX Savage 2x8GB 2400MHz C11 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung Evo 840 TR Archon SB-E X2 Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 x64 Asus MG279Q 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Cherry MX-Board 3.0 Cooler Master V850 SilverStone TJ06 Logitech G700S 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Q6600 G0 Asus P5K Premium Black Pearl Sapphire Toxic HD5850 Corsair Dominator 4GB 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
Crucial MX 100 256GB TR TRUE Rev.A Win 7 Pro x64 Cooler Master V650 
  hide details  
Reply
XPS - R7 1700
(14 items)
 
XPS - i5 4690K
(12 items)
 
XPS - Q6600
(8 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 7 1700 Asus Crosshair VI Hero Sapphire Fury X@1145/545 G.Skill Trident Z 2x 8GB 3200MHz C14 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
Samsung Evo 840 ThermalRight Archon IB-E X2 + 2x TY143 ThermalRight TY-143 2x front case intake Arctic Cooling F12 + 2x F9 as rear case exhaust 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 Pro x64 Asus MG279Q Cherry MX-Board 3.0 Cooler Master V850 
CaseMouse
SilverStone TJ06 Logitech G700S 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 4690K@4.9GHz 1.255V Asus Maximus VII Ranger Sapphire Fury X@1145/545 HyperX Savage 2x8GB 2400MHz C11 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung Evo 840 TR Archon SB-E X2 Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 x64 Asus MG279Q 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Cherry MX-Board 3.0 Cooler Master V850 SilverStone TJ06 Logitech G700S 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Q6600 G0 Asus P5K Premium Black Pearl Sapphire Toxic HD5850 Corsair Dominator 4GB 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
Crucial MX 100 256GB TR TRUE Rev.A Win 7 Pro x64 Cooler Master V650 
  hide details  
Reply
post #8916 of 11544
Posted before that I saw no gains on FPS with 2400MHz vs 3200MHz with 3.8GHz CPU in 3DM FS/E, then I posted some Crysis 2 / TombRaider 2013 / Bioshock Infinite FRAPS tests.

Today I added 2133MHz vs 3200MHz SuperPosition 1080P Extreme preset in OP of thread in my sig, not seeing any difference. Is it GPU not meaty enough? may go to my bench use 1175MHz / 545MHz OC ROM to see what happens.
XPS - R7 1700
(14 items)
 
XPS - i5 4690K
(12 items)
 
XPS - Q6600
(8 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 7 1700 Asus Crosshair VI Hero Sapphire Fury X@1145/545 G.Skill Trident Z 2x 8GB 3200MHz C14 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
Samsung Evo 840 ThermalRight Archon IB-E X2 + 2x TY143 ThermalRight TY-143 2x front case intake Arctic Cooling F12 + 2x F9 as rear case exhaust 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 Pro x64 Asus MG279Q Cherry MX-Board 3.0 Cooler Master V850 
CaseMouse
SilverStone TJ06 Logitech G700S 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 4690K@4.9GHz 1.255V Asus Maximus VII Ranger Sapphire Fury X@1145/545 HyperX Savage 2x8GB 2400MHz C11 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung Evo 840 TR Archon SB-E X2 Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 x64 Asus MG279Q 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Cherry MX-Board 3.0 Cooler Master V850 SilverStone TJ06 Logitech G700S 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Q6600 G0 Asus P5K Premium Black Pearl Sapphire Toxic HD5850 Corsair Dominator 4GB 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
Crucial MX 100 256GB TR TRUE Rev.A Win 7 Pro x64 Cooler Master V650 
  hide details  
Reply
XPS - R7 1700
(14 items)
 
XPS - i5 4690K
(12 items)
 
XPS - Q6600
(8 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Ryzen 7 1700 Asus Crosshair VI Hero Sapphire Fury X@1145/545 G.Skill Trident Z 2x 8GB 3200MHz C14 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
Samsung Evo 840 ThermalRight Archon IB-E X2 + 2x TY143 ThermalRight TY-143 2x front case intake Arctic Cooling F12 + 2x F9 as rear case exhaust 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 Pro x64 Asus MG279Q Cherry MX-Board 3.0 Cooler Master V850 
CaseMouse
SilverStone TJ06 Logitech G700S 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 4690K@4.9GHz 1.255V Asus Maximus VII Ranger Sapphire Fury X@1145/545 HyperX Savage 2x8GB 2400MHz C11 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung Evo 840 TR Archon SB-E X2 Win 7 Pro x64 / Win 10 x64 Asus MG279Q 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Cherry MX-Board 3.0 Cooler Master V850 SilverStone TJ06 Logitech G700S 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Q6600 G0 Asus P5K Premium Black Pearl Sapphire Toxic HD5850 Corsair Dominator 4GB 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
Crucial MX 100 256GB TR TRUE Rev.A Win 7 Pro x64 Cooler Master V650 
  hide details  
Reply
post #8917 of 11544
was able to get ram 3520mhz, but not 3600 sad-smiley-002.gif hope that with new bios i will reach 3600 tongue.gif but maybe my cpu is limiting me nerdsmiley.png
post #8918 of 11544
Quote:
Originally Posted by gupsterg View Post

CB15 with PB set in UEFI consistently gives improved performance. Not tested other stuff yet.


UEFI 0079 4.0GHz 3200MHz C14 with CB PB (Click to show)


UEFI 0081 4.0GHz 3200MHz C14 without CB PB (Click to show)


UEFI 0081 4.0GHz 3200MHz C14 with CB PB (Click to show)
Yeah, I've seen your images. It looks like a pretty consistent 50 point improvement in the Cinebench benchmark. But I have no interest in running the Cinebench benchmark just for its sake. My original question was do any of the benchmark PB profiles translate to the practical world. I was looking for any improvement in the normally running apps or to the point my distributed processing apps. I haven't seen any.
post #8919 of 11544
Quote:
Originally Posted by alucardis666 View Post

So what's the max OC on the 1700? 4.0ghz?
For 24/7 it varies. 4.0 is a little high but doable, for some it's easy. Non suicide air 4.3 doable for validation but not for faint of heart. Your mileage Will vary.
post #8920 of 11544
Quote:
Originally Posted by yendor View Post

For 24/7 it varies. 4.0 is a little high but doable, for some it's easy. Non suicide air 4.3 doable for validation but not for faint of heart. Your mileage Will vary.

Hmmm ok. I'm hoping for 4.0Ghz stable 24/7 with the H100i and push pull. thumb.gif
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD CPUs
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › [Official] RYZEN 7 1800X | 1700X |1700 Owners Club & 4GHz+ Club