CompuBench database now lists new device ID (687F:C1), which is more commonly known as Vega GPU. This is the same ID we saw back in January during the Doom 4K Ultra demo. The fact that Vega has finally made its way to CompuBench means that we are the very end of the development process. Judging from past OpenCL leaks, we are looking at weeks, rather than months.
But before we look at the benchmarks, we finally have a 'proof' that Vega has 64 Compute Units (64*64 = 4096 Stream Processors). Device specs also list two clock frequencies with a maximum boost clock of 1200 MHz:
Please offer something in April even if it isn't the flagship. Between 1080 and Ti for 500 would be okay for me as I've patiently skipped 300,fury, and Polaris.
But those clock speeds are not final. We are talking about 9.8 TFLOPS with 1200MHz and we know that the MI25 has 12.5 TFLOPS which results in ~1500MHz.
it really depends on the price.... which i have confidence with AMD
Not as fast as 1080Ti? Personally i don't care b/c I would possibly never need such performance...
it really depends on the price.... which i have confidence with AMD
Not as fast as 1080Ti? Personally i don't care b/c I would possibly never need such performance...
Indeed , but you have to have high performance to compete in the high performance market..And,as it was said before , Nvidia can very easily cut prices,especially if you consider the sheer amount of 1060s & 1070s & 1080s they've sold all this time that AMD couldn't compete in that area..
it really depends on the price.... which i have confidence with AMD Not as fast as 1080Ti? Personally i don't care b/c I would possibly never need such performance...
Yeah as one has to factor in how long since launch until good stock comes in, i remember buying my GTX970 it took a while to come back in stock once it was released.
Let's see where AMD is going to price that thing. They are in trouble, because Nvidia basically has a good GPU for each price and performance segment. The 1080 is like 488€ in Europe right now and AMD needs to go below that in price if VEGA performs roughly the same since I believe the 1080 will probably consume less power and overclock better.
On the other hand I think AMD will do a Fury again. I hope they are not, but they probably do some sort of "look at us we have HBM2" halo card named VEGA with a weird price and performance standpoint.
Something really awkward like 650$ for performance between 1080 and 1080 Ti, but with the same power draw as a 1080 Ti and overclocks really bad. Will be great at 4K and 8K though.
Let's see where AMD is going to price that thing. They are in trouble, because Nvidia basically has a good GPU for each price and performance segment. The 1080 is like 488€ in Europe right now and AMD needs to go below that in price if VEGA performs roughly the same since I believe the 1080 will probably consume less power and overclock better.
On the other hand I think AMD will do a Fury again. I hope they are not, but they probably do some sort of "look at us we have HBM2" halo card named VEGA with a weird price and performance standpoint.
Something really awkward like 650$ for performance between 1080 and 1080 Ti, but with the same power draw as a 1080 Ti and overclocks really bad. Will be great at 4K and 8K though.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.2K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!