CHG70: 2560X1440, HDR, 144hz "1ms" 125% SRGB , Quantum Dot Gaming Curved Monitor. 27" and 31.5". Freesync and G-sync models.
CFG75: G sync version of the current CFG70 model. For those that have no idea about CFG70, 1080p, 144hz 1ms Quantum Dot Curved Monitor. Available in 23.5" and 27".
CHG50: 31.5" QD curved gaming monitor.
SHG50: Same spec as CHG70. Only difference is the flat screen. 2K, 144hz 1 ms.
I'm somewhat puzzled by the dressing up of TN panels for wide color gamut. It would be impossible to fully realize good color from one unless you are viewing it from say four times the normal distance. The other option would be if they are being "optimistic" about the response time of some other panel technology to a point beyond where anyone has dared before.
I'm somewhat puzzled by the dressing up of TN panels for wide color gamut. It would be impossible to fully realize good color from one unless you are viewing it from say four times the normal distance. The other option would be if they are being "optimistic" about the response time of some other panel technology to a point beyond where anyone has dared before.
CFG70s are VAs these are coming after and are again VAs to my knowledge. TNs are dead unless you want to buy a cheaper 144Hz 1080p.
No way can TN do the color range of IPS/VA.
No idea where you're getting that Samsung is launching more TNs.
What Samsung needs is an issue free panel and monitor build with 144Hz IPS/VA at a reasonable price, so far they are bugged and cost three times as much as a Samsung IPS/PLS 60Hz of the same size. Ridiculous.
They gotta bring prices down and remove issues that make the CFG borderline unusable.
I really hope that 32" 1440p 144hz screen turns out to be decent. I have been using a 32" 1440p 60hz screen for a while and I really don't want to go down in size or up in resolution but I would love to have a higher refresh rate and freesync.
It's not actually the response time, it's 1ms MPRT (Moving Picture Response Time) whatever that means (probably having backlight strobing and reducing motion blur to 1ms of blur?) but according to pcmonitors.info review of the monitor it has a 4.14 MS input lag.
anyway still waiting for those self emissive quantum dot aka real qled or oled monitors... cya in 2025 guys
Who cares. If it needed 1.4 it would have it, if it doesn't need it then it gains nothing by having it. Having the most up to date connections is important on a source, an output only needs what it can use.
that 40" sounds pretty amazing but 32:9 sounds pretty ridiculous for vertical height. It would make out to be only a 22" 16:9 screen. So its very likely 1080p.
Imo its just too thin. While that much Desk space coverage by 1 monitor sounds fantastic, 21:9 is already thin for its diagonal. A 44" or so 21:9 would be perfect =)
But Right now I'm banking on buying a monitor 4-5 months down the road and keeping a eye on those 38" Ultrawides at 3840x1600 reso
It's not actually the response time, it's 1ms MPRT (Moving Picture Response Time) whatever that means (probably having backlight strobing and reducing motion blur to 1ms of blur?) but according to pcmonitors.info review of the monitor it has a 4.14 MS input lag.
anyway still waiting for those self emissive quantum dot aka real qled or oled monitors... cya in 2025 guys
Ah got it! Well 4ms sure isn't bad and that CHG70 is pretty much exactly what I'm looking for. I've been going back and forth on finding the right 27" 2k monitor for over a year and that one (with freesync) seems to check all the boxes.
that 40" sounds pretty amazing but 32:9 sounds pretty ridiculous for vertical height. It would make out to be only a 22" 16:9 screen. So its very likely 1080p.
Imo its just too thin. While that much Desk space coverage by 1 monitor sounds fantastic, 21:9 is already thin for its diagonal. A 44" or so 21:9 would be perfect =)
But Right now I'm banking on buying a monitor 4-5 months down the road and keeping a eye on those 38" Ultrawides at 3840x1600 reso
That CHG70 seems to check all the boxes I've been looking for in a monitor. Hopefully they figured out the issues they had with their last VA monitors.
That CHG70 seems to check all the boxes I've been looking for in a monitor. Hopefully they figured out the issues they had with their last VA monitors.
Me too, and the text seem to suggest there will be flat versions later. But i will wait till i have Volta 80 TI or something similar from AMD to drive it. I might catch a cheap gtx 1080 this year, for my current VA Benq GW2760hs.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.2K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!