Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Mice › Rival 110
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Rival 110 - Page 7

post #61 of 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by M1st View Post


We're talking about company that "upgraded" Kana shape from 3090 to 3059.

 

There are other differences though....

post #62 of 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by woll3 View Post

There are other differences though....

Yeah but the whole idea of stepping back in sensor department when releasing a new mouse that's supposed to be successor for the other mouse sounds silly to me.
post #63 of 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by M1st View Post


Yeah but the whole idea of stepping back in sensor department when releasing a new mouse that's supposed to be successor for the other mouse sounds silly to me.

 

Availability, it is unlikely that they could have filled the demand with 3090, they could have gone for 3320 as well, but as we know it has that one limitation.

post #64 of 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by woll3 View Post

Availability, it is unlikely that they could have filled the demand with 3090, they could have gone for 3320 as well, but as we know it has that one limitation.

Actually makes sense. Although i don't think 3320 was already out at the moment of R100 release.
post #65 of 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by M1st View Post


Actually makes sense. Although i don't think 3320 was already out at the moment of R100 release.

 

IIRC CW100 omg was released in early spring 2015, while the Press releases of the R100 were sent out in fall, i also think Rival Rescuer/Saviour was released before R100, anyway 305x was the better choice given a vocal minority and their problems and to the average joe in retail it just looks like an overall upgrade.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Mice
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Mice › Rival 110