18C is 4.5x more than the 7700K and that thing can use up to 180w+ at 5ghz? If you could clock them to 5ghz, you'd be close to 700w+. The radiator sizes you'd be using would be kinda massive to keep that cool, right?
I'm considering delidding all of these CPUs right off the bat by default, and then binning them after delidding. Only a very small amount of Kaby Lake processors we sell are purchased without delidding as it is. These higher core count processors are going to be fireballs when overclocked.
why not try Kaby Lake-X binning? because, maybe there will be some worthy difference in overclocking potential compared to 7700K, who knows. why it is stated as 112W TDP than?
about deliding and soldering.. if we do not care for warranty, maybe it is better to have it delided with liquid metal, as I heard it net better temperatures than soldering.
I'm considering delidding all of these CPUs right off the bat by default, and then binning them after delidding. Only a very small amount of Kaby Lake processors we sell are purchased without delidding as it is. These higher core count processors are going to be fireballs when overclocked.
Solid. I'm thinking that'll be an absolute necessity to get at the potential of these guys, given that they're not soldered. Performance should be very good, though.
my understanding of liquid tim gets worse over time due to cooling off and heating up repeatedly, constant expansion/contraction creates cracks so isn't it better to use something like ICDiamond rather than liquid cool lab tim?
my understanding of liquid tim gets worse over time due to cooling off and heating up repeatedly, constant expansion/contraction creates cracks so isn't it better to use something like ICDiamond rather than liquid cool lab tim?
18C is 4.5x more than the 7700K and that thing can use up to 180w+ at 5ghz? If you could clock them to 5ghz, you'd be close to 700w+. The radiator sizes you'd be using would be kinda massive to keep that cool, right?
Power consumption will scale linearly with core count for a given clock speed*voltage. If a 4 core, 5GHz CPU uses 150W, a CPU with 4.5 times the cores will use 675W. It just has to. In the enterprise, this is solved with lower clocks and voltages.
Power consumption will scale linearly with core count for a given clock speed*voltage. If a 4 core, 5GHz CPU uses 150W, a CPU with 4.5 times the cores will use 675W. It just has to. In the enterprise, this is solved with lower clocks and voltages.
Power consumption will scale linearly with core count for a given clock speed*voltage. If a 4 core, 5GHz CPU uses 150W, a CPU with 4.5 times the cores will use 675W. It just has to. In the enterprise, this is solved with lower clocks and voltages.
Power consumption will scale linearly with core count for a given clock speed*voltage. If a 4 core, 5GHz CPU uses 150W, a CPU with 4.5 times the cores will use 675W. It just has to. In the enterprise, this is solved with lower clocks and voltages.
Yes, but server chips are still running at 2.4 GHz for the highest core-count parts. For that speed they probably only run at 0.9 V. Even then they are 165W parts.
I'll be ordering at least a 7820x from you all. Not sure if I can stretch to a 7900x.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.2K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!