The maintenance is almost over. The new native BOINC apps are being tested in the local network now. We expect the project to be restarted at the end of next week. This will be preceded by server and storage upgrade. The work on the database is still in progress and will continue in parallel with the computations.
Also, the paper "XANSONS for COD: a new small BOINC project in crystallography" was accepted for presentation at the BOINC:FAST'2017 conference which is to be held in Petrozavodsk, Russia in August.
Where does it sat that? The last time there were tasks available I signed up and immediately got 3 tasks. Then the project shut down for the mentioned maintenance.
The tasks are too damn quick so I made an app_config to only use 1 CPU core. The server can't keep it fed so other projects were constantly pausing and resuming:
I have this running on my 480 in Linux, and the initial results look very good. The sample size is small, but here are a couple of tasks for comparison vs my wingmen:
I have this running on my 480 in Linux, and the initial results look very good. The sample size is small, but here are a couple of tasks for comparison vs my wingmen:
I have this running on my 480 in Linux, and the initial results look very good. The sample size is small, but here are a couple of tasks for comparison vs my wingmen:
Just remember that 7990 is running 4x..... (I know it's an excuse, but then again I have the fastest Tahitis on the project, probably cause I have the only independent Tahitis on the project)
Still this is the first project I've seen a 480 faster than a tahiti of mine....... Opps wait a sec........ that is in Linus isn't it?
Well, that changes everything, try and get that time in windows..... {chuckle}
Decidedly an Nvidea/Linux favorable project. probably something I won't be running run long term..... Currently I've got 8 on it and it pencils out to 1.3 million a day.
Besides I have a strong dislike for projects that update once a day, makes it difficult to track. (and very boring)
This is one of the places that the once a day update bite us users.... Program directors should be aware of this, if they cared about what makes their users tick....
I have this running on my 480 in Linux, and the initial results look very good. The sample size is small, but here are a couple of tasks for comparison vs my wingmen:
Just remember that 7990 is running 4x..... (I know it's an excuse, but then again I have the fastest Tahitis on the project, probably cause I have the only independent Tahitis on the project)
Still this is the first project I've seen a 480 faster than a tahiti of mine....... Opps wait a sec........ that is in Linus isn't it?
Well, that changes everything, try and get that time in windows..... {chuckle}
Decidedly an Nvidea/Linux favorable project. probably something I won't be running run long term..... Currently I've got 8 on it and it pencils out to 1.3 million a day.
Besides I have a strong dislike for projects that update once a day, makes it difficult to track. (and very boring)
Just for clarification when you say 4x is that concurrently per GPU (8 tasks per video card, 16 tasks for the machine) or do you mean 4 tasks total for the machine?
Just for clarification when you say 4x is that concurrently per GPU (8 tasks per video card, 16 tasks for the machine) or do you mean 4 tasks total for the machine?
Runs very smooth and cool, and I was giving it 8 cores in process lasso. At Collatz settings, (or a bit below)
One of the problems with tracking the WU's is that they are all different lengths ranging from 9 seconds to 22 minutes. (CPU's turned off in preferences) So we have to resort to wingman searches to find comparables.
Not an easy task.....
So, for those specific WU, if I was running just those WU I would be getting 4 per GPU in 10:27 or 2:37 per WU, for the whole machine the output would be 39-40 seconds per if it was running just that specific type of WU. But it gives out all the different WU sizes all at the same time so it is very difficult to track comparisons like this...
Would be interesting to see how it does at the higher performance settings, just remember that your in Linux with that card and it seems to run 45-50% faster in linux than windows...
And I cannot run a 7990 in linux...... (no functional drivers)
The Linux-Windows comparison is the most interesting thing to me. No other GPU project has been substantially better in Linux. For the most part an AMD GPU in Linux has been equal to or worse than running in Windows.
For NVIDIA that is generally not the case. Prior to the development of the new AMD Linux driver stack, AMD performance in Linux for most tasks was generally poor compared to NVIDIA.
Well, if the initial comparison holds and your 480 can beat my Tahitis running in linux, then I think they may have fixed the problem I think.....
The thing that irks me is these projects, if optimised correctly, run equally well on both types of hardware, Collatz proved that for good with it's nVideaOCL app.
Just get the project devs to implement it.....
(good luck with that)
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.2K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!