Maybe you foolish lambs should try and remember that THIS IS A SYNTHETIC BENCHMARK, where nVidia is BETTER, due to the nature of that benchmark. A 290X beats the 780 Ti by 10% in real life usage, but in Fire Strike is behind by 10% AT LEAST. Same with the FuryX, in 4k they perform almost the same, but in Fire Strike the FuryX gets 20% lower scores.
AMD has already said that this card is not for gaming and their engineers are having trouble with drivers for the new architecture. Are people really this dense to be surprised about this? This card got released over the RX because the gaming drivers aren't ready.
He admitted he is running on a 550W power supply with OCed CPU and clocks weren't stable. No one is shiping the GPUs yet so everything is a little odd.
AMD has already said that this card is not for gaming and their engineers are having trouble with drivers. Are people really this dense to be surprised about this?
~6 mos ago i almost grabbed a fury-x w/full cover block for ~$350/obo and was looking at some 4K freesync screens for ~$500 just to have something new. i figured to go amd/vega for the next card for the freesync.
sorta glad i stood pat ATM but still bored.
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.2K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!