Overclock.net banner

NEW!!! DRAM Calculator for Ryzen™ 1.7.3 (overclocking DRAM on AM4) + MEMbench 0.8 (DRAM bench)

3M views 11K replies 1K participants last post by  devoker 
#1 · (Edited by Moderator)

AMD Ryzen Memory Tweaking & Overclocking Guide

AMD Ryzen Memory Tweaking & Overclocking Guide

MEMbench 0.6 README

HOW USE MEMTEST in MEMbench


DRAM Calculator for Ryzen™ 1.7.3 + MEMbench 0.8
Last update : 14 May







Download:
Techpowerup link
Guru3d link
WCCFTECH link
Сomputerbase.de link

Techspot link



Video instruction:






Instruction + recommendations

The results of a successful overclocking can be seen here:
AMD OC Statistics
ROG Crosshair VI overclocking thread


Some interesting posts:
What is a single error?
Influence of СLDO_VDDP on MEMCLK "holes"
Effect of temperature and higher voltage on memory stability
Effect of the CPU frequency on the stability of the RAM


Great gratitude STaRDoGG , slafniy , ajc9988 and A_z_z_y for help !

This program is publicly available for publication in news resources and preparation of reviews. The copyright to the logic of the program and the product is present.​
 
See less See more
5 3
#6 ·
Tested timings from V2 as i see V3 gives same numbers.


500% give or take 1 hour Y-Cruncher and loads LOADS of IBT runs.

With those timings my system Scores more. Its more responsive at lower volts !!! dont think i can get anything more from this motherboard cpu and ddr combo lol
biggrin.gif


Is it ok to link this topic on forums ?? Deffo out of alpha stage even passed beta stage !!!
 
#7 ·
You need to mention, people need to be REAL careful with the Taiphoon Burner. Or they may brick their RAM sticks.
 
  • Rep+
Reactions: Fright
#8 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by lordzed83 View Post

Tested timings from V2 as i see V3 gives same numbers.


500% give or take 1 hour Y-Cruncher and loads LOADS of IBT runs.

With those timings my system Scores more. Its more responsive at lower volts !!! dont think i can get anything more from this motherboard cpu and ddr combo lol
biggrin.gif


Is it ok to link this topic on forums ?? Deffo out of alpha stage even passed beta stage !!!
I already went ahead and linked it, but as far it being out of any stage.... ehh? I mean thats up to 1usmus to decided if he feels its truly ready for the limelight and well... some sort of additional calc variable for blk offset would be nice.
biggrin.gif
No idea how hard it would be or if it even matters, I'm ganna end up seeing if I get any sort of different results with gear down disabled now that memory is completely strapped or if a looser tRC or using tRFC ult instead does me any favors in that regard.
 
#10 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeager View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by ku4eto View Post

You need to mention, people need to be REAL careful with the Taiphoon Burner. Or they may brick their RAM sticks.
How ?
if have Asus aura or a similar program that accesses the spd bus running and active while attempting to read the spd of a ram stick in typhoon burner you can potentially corrupt it
 
#11 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by lordzed83 View Post

Tested timings from V2 as i see V3 gives same numbers.


500% give or take 1 hour Y-Cruncher and loads LOADS of IBT runs.

With those timings my system Scores more. Its more responsive at lower volts !!! dont think i can get anything more from this motherboard cpu and ddr combo lol
biggrin.gif


Is it ok to link this topic on forums ??
Deffo out of alpha stage even passed beta stage !!!
Don't think it's ready yet to go out of Beta stage
Still some non-functioning features in it
Plus... usmus is still working on finetuning the calculation(s) of certain timings (i asume)
 
#14 ·
Thanks guys for advice and support
smile.gif


I think at the current stage the program has a beta stage, the main functions work but you still need to work on the balance, the nuances turned out to be much more than just using the formula for calculations

the difference between 0.9.9 2 and 0.9.9 3 in optimizing the download speed, the changed interface and instructions
smile.gif


Quote:
Originally Posted by ku4eto View Post

You need to mention, people need to be REAL careful with the Taiphoon Burner. Or they may brick their RAM sticks.
it's impossible to spoil anything
smile.gif

Quote:
Originally Posted by poisson21 View Post

Tried it with my 4*16Gb of f4-3200c14 16gtz, able to boot but memtest found error really fast so i'll try later to meddle with the timmings more. Currently going to work for the next 36 hrs ;'(.
most likely the problem in the settings of "RTT" or "proODT", it is worth checking all
 
#16 ·
For my kit, RGB GSkill 3600C16 2x8Gb, I can use TheStilt fast timings for 3200 Mhz profile with the 3466 speed.
biggrin.gif




I've tweaked also some timings (tRRDS from 6 to 4; tFAW from 36 to 24; tWRWR SD and DD from 7 to 5; and tRDRD SD and DD from 5 to 3 and last tCKE from 9 to 1) a bit strictly and the system is benchable and playable (I think to be rock stable I've to play also with other settings as CLDO_VDDP and VDDP)
tongue.gif


Due my low knowledge, when possible, I prefer to leave the settings on auto.
redface.gif




One of the most important thing (for my experience on this platform) to boot in my case are also the BGS and GDM settings.
rolleyes.gif


The settings proposed in that fields are really a no go for me.



Good work 1usmus
thumb.gif
 
#17 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by ibeat117 View Post

Thanks for your work i´m now using my 4 DPC B-Die at 3466 fast @1,45v , but there is still a issue:



i would be very thankful if you would edit that out or change it to something else
agree, corrected, link updated
 
#18 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by LicSqualo View Post

For my kit, RGB GSkill 3600C16 2x8Gb, I can use TheStilt fast timings for 3200 Mhz profile with the 3466 speed.
biggrin.gif




I've tweaked also some timings (tRRDS from 6 to 4; tFAW from 36 to 24; tWRWR SD and DD from 7 to 5; and tRDRD SD and DD from 5 to 3 and last tCKE from 9 to 1) a bit strictly and the system is benchable and playable (I think to be rock stable I've to play also with other settings as CLDO_VDDP and VDDP)
tongue.gif


Due my low knowledge, when possible, I prefer to leave the settings on auto.
redface.gif




One of the most important thing (for my experience on this platform) to boot in my case are also the BGS and GDM settings.
rolleyes.gif


The settings proposed in that fields are really a no go for me.



Good work 1usmus
thumb.gif
thanks ,some understated timings are responsible for recharging banks and read / write commands in one / different banks, you cut them, the speed of this action will not increase unfortunately, but the system will lose stability.You tested the system with a test of HСI 16 X 750 mb ?
 
#19 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1usmus View Post

thanks ,some understated timings are responsible for recharging banks and read / write commands in one / different banks, you cut them, the speed of this action will not increase unfortunately, but the system will lose stability.You tested the system with a test of HСI 16 X 750 mb ?
THANK YOU!
smile.gif
Yes, tested and not stable,
tongue.gif
give me errors at 300% or more. So I've to move to tWRWR SD and DD to 7 and tRDRD SD and DD to 5 to try to be stable... this night?
rolleyes.gif
TechpowerupMemTest 64 is the same?
tongue.gif
 
#20 ·
tWRWR SD and DD to 7 and tRDRD SD and DD to 5 + 14 14 14 14 28 42 primary timings

I dislike TechpowerupMemTest 64 , he seldom finds errors. HCI 16 window 750mb - best test
 
#21 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeager View Post

How ?
If you put wrong timings - like too low, not correct formula, you may not ever boot again with that stick. Esp if you touch the lowest frequency strap (2133Mhz or whatever is for DDR4). Otherwise, if you crap out only the highest frequency, you can always just reset CMOS and run at lower speed into Windows and edit back with Typhoon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1usmus View Post

it's impossible to spoil anything
smile.gif
There is always way to break something
biggrin.gif
 
#24 ·
Ok, test passed
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif


Thank you 1usmus!!!
thumb.gif
but of course I've tested only changing tWRWR and tRDRD
wink.gif


So, my kit can manage these settings and perhaps also better! I'm thinking to lower tRC and tRAS as suggested by your calculator, next...

 
#25 ·
For BGS and GDM i noted that are wrong in calculator for my kit, both! and if I change GDM from "auto" to "Disabled" is a no go (no boot) and BGS -one of the two- are to be active to boot, as suggested is a no boot.
 
#26 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by LicSqualo View Post

For BGS and GDM i noted that are wrong in calculator for my kit, both! and if I change GDM from "auto" to "Disabled" is a no go (no boot) and BGS -one of the two- are to be active to boot, as suggested is a no boot.
impressive! you have a very high-quality copy of the processor and memory
thumb.gif
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top