And oh boy, here I was a few months ago speculating that they wanted to charge 10 core Broadwell-E pricing down the line (~ $1.7k) for the Titan because HBM2 is expensive and here they go and make it $2,999.
Why are they calling it Titan at this price range? Why not Quadro? Is this indicative of what's to come next year for the GeForce lineup in the absence of competitive cards from AMD?
$3k for a card that won't have certified drivers nor professional support from them seems misplaced. This should have been in the Quadro range. The Titan has always been a prosumer card. How many prosumers can or want to spend 3k on a card? It didn't work very well the last time with the Titan Z.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.2K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!