Originally Posted by Ihatethedukes
Do you know ANYTHING about Brisbane? Obviously not. Nasgul not knowing what he's talking about again FTL. I'd say that 3.2GHz or so on air is a whole lot better than non-existent (meaning 90nm going to 3.0 AT BEST ONLY on the amazing steppings and 2.8Ghz on the typical ones).
From 1.90ghz to 3.20ghz on air? Quit dreaming, amd can barely brake the 3.0ghz overclock. 65nm didn't do anything for amd, unlike what it did for Intel in terms of overclocking.
IF there's one thing I know, it's that amd cpus can't brake 3.0ghz 24/7 stable, so please, keep your fanboyism to a minimum.
BTW, ATI is good at waiting what nVidia has and then after the released of nVidia's TOL card, ATI just releases something 2 or 3 months later better than what nVidia just released, it's typical of ATI, or at least was, that's why they take the time.
Just like when the GX2 came out but they try to make a fairy tale release of a x1950xtx with the first card ever to use GDDR4 but not that didn't help, so that pretty much stumped them.
And now, they're doing just that again, waiting to come out with something that'd be better than the current GTX but so far? Not good.