Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › Intel responds to Barcelona benchmarks
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Intel responds to Barcelona benchmarks - Page 7

post #61 of 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaytonCallihan View Post
I feel bad for AMD, they got all excited thinking they would out do intel. lawl.
Seems kinda familiar for some reason actually. Netburst anyone? Preshotts, you know the list goes on.
'bout time.
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X6 Thuban; 2.8 Asus M4A87TD Evo Radeon HD 6850 1GB G.Skill 4GB (2x2) DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Caviar Black 1TB Lite-On DVD/CD RW Windows 7 Home 64-bit Acer G235HAbd 23'' WideScreen 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitec K120 OCZ ModXStream Pro 600W Cooler Master HAF 932 Gigabyte GM-M6800 
Mouse Pad
XTRAC Ripper Black 
  hide details  
Reply
'bout time.
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X6 Thuban; 2.8 Asus M4A87TD Evo Radeon HD 6850 1GB G.Skill 4GB (2x2) DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Caviar Black 1TB Lite-On DVD/CD RW Windows 7 Home 64-bit Acer G235HAbd 23'' WideScreen 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitec K120 OCZ ModXStream Pro 600W Cooler Master HAF 932 Gigabyte GM-M6800 
Mouse Pad
XTRAC Ripper Black 
  hide details  
Reply
post #62 of 91
How in the world did this become a economic debate? Oh well, might as well at my 2 cents.

Intel gives me more utility's for my dollar making it the best deal for me.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 4690k msi z97 gaming 5 evga 980 ti G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
samsung 950 HP dual layer Windows 7 64 27 dell ips  
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
G15 850 TX corsair 540 air G900 
Mouse Pad
generic 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 4690k msi z97 gaming 5 evga 980 ti G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
samsung 950 HP dual layer Windows 7 64 27 dell ips  
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
G15 850 TX corsair 540 air G900 
Mouse Pad
generic 
  hide details  
Reply
post #63 of 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by Audi View Post
Welcome to Overclock.net... where stock doesn't matter...
Welcome to the average users world, where stock does matter.....
'bout time.
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X6 Thuban; 2.8 Asus M4A87TD Evo Radeon HD 6850 1GB G.Skill 4GB (2x2) DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Caviar Black 1TB Lite-On DVD/CD RW Windows 7 Home 64-bit Acer G235HAbd 23'' WideScreen 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitec K120 OCZ ModXStream Pro 600W Cooler Master HAF 932 Gigabyte GM-M6800 
Mouse Pad
XTRAC Ripper Black 
  hide details  
Reply
'bout time.
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X6 Thuban; 2.8 Asus M4A87TD Evo Radeon HD 6850 1GB G.Skill 4GB (2x2) DDR3 1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
WD Caviar Black 1TB Lite-On DVD/CD RW Windows 7 Home 64-bit Acer G235HAbd 23'' WideScreen 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitec K120 OCZ ModXStream Pro 600W Cooler Master HAF 932 Gigabyte GM-M6800 
Mouse Pad
XTRAC Ripper Black 
  hide details  
Reply
post #64 of 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by pauldovi View Post
Not going to happen. The E6300 is significantly faster than the 5200+.
What are you basing this fact on? Not only are you saying it's faster, but you're saying "significantly" faster, so I'd like to see proof. This review shows the 5200+ and the E6300.......not only is the E6300 not "significantly" beating the 5200+, it actually loses almost all of the tests to the 5200+. According to you, this is atypical, so I'd like to see tests showing far different results.

http://www.behardware.com/art/imprimer/657/
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2500k Asus P8P67 Galaxy GTX580 8GB G Skill Ripjaws 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel 80 gb SSD, Raptor 150 Windows 7 Home Premium 24" Samsung LCD Saitek Eclipse 
PowerCaseMouse
PCP&C 750W Antec P180 Logitech MX-510 blue 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2500k Asus P8P67 Galaxy GTX580 8GB G Skill Ripjaws 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel 80 gb SSD, Raptor 150 Windows 7 Home Premium 24" Samsung LCD Saitek Eclipse 
PowerCaseMouse
PCP&C 750W Antec P180 Logitech MX-510 blue 
  hide details  
Reply
post #65 of 91
At all stock, all of the C2D line up can be beaten by other AMD offerings E6600 and below.
Raptor Raper
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Something with transistors FOXCONN Boodrage -> eVGA classified e760 GTX 480 / HD6850@1090/1200 3x2 gig G Skill Trident DDR2000 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x128GB Crucial C300 Sumsung SATA DVD-RW 64 bit Windows 7 Samsung 245BW 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft curve Tagan ITZ 800W DD Torture Rack Diamondback 
  hide details  
Reply
Raptor Raper
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Something with transistors FOXCONN Boodrage -> eVGA classified e760 GTX 480 / HD6850@1090/1200 3x2 gig G Skill Trident DDR2000 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x128GB Crucial C300 Sumsung SATA DVD-RW 64 bit Windows 7 Samsung 245BW 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft curve Tagan ITZ 800W DD Torture Rack Diamondback 
  hide details  
Reply
post #66 of 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedevil View Post


In response to AMD's Barcelona benchmarks Intel demoed its V8 platform. Two quad core Xeons at 3GHz with 16GB RAM score an impressive 4933 pixels per second in POV-Ray. In comparison AMD's quad quad core Barcelona (16 cores total) score just over 4000 pixels per second. Even though AMD did not mention the clockspeed and said the final version will run faster AMD still uses 16 cores while Intel uses 8. Of course Barcelona is not yet a final product, Intel is not impressed though.
Besides that Intel also demoed a Penryn which outperformed the current top of the line quad cores by 40%, quite impressive.

Source: Ãœberpulse
From what I understand in the futuremark forum, the demo you're referring to has the Intel cores clocked 1.2 ghz faster than the AMD cores and the demo is mainly to show energy usage. Either way, the demo is not very detailed or reliable from what I saw.

http://www.futuremark.com/forum/show...t=47966&page=4
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
PII x4 965 Asus m3a79-T Sapphire TOXIC 5850 OCZ Reaper 2x2gb DDR 1066 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Stupid Vista Samsung 2494SW OCZ GameXstream 700w Corsair 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
PII x4 965 Asus m3a79-T Sapphire TOXIC 5850 OCZ Reaper 2x2gb DDR 1066 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Stupid Vista Samsung 2494SW OCZ GameXstream 700w Corsair 600T 
  hide details  
Reply
post #67 of 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by FuNkDrSpOt View Post
From what I understand in the futuremark forum, the demo you're referring to has the Intel cores clocked 1.2 ghz faster than the AMD cores and the demo is mainly to show energy usage. Either way, the demo is not very detailed or reliable from what I saw.

http://www.futuremark.com/forum/show...t=47966&page=4
The Intel's might of been clocked faster, but the AMD system has twice the cores!

Either way, I wouldn't really upset about these tests. This is just show-off and not really that practical.
System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 2500k ASRock P67 Extreme4 Gen 3 AMD 7970 16GB DDR3 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Intel 520 256GB SATA DVD Burner Windows 7 64 bit Deal U2410 
KeyboardPowerMouse
Adesso Mechanical Silverstone OP650 Logitech G700 
  hide details  
Reply
System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 2500k ASRock P67 Extreme4 Gen 3 AMD 7970 16GB DDR3 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Intel 520 256GB SATA DVD Burner Windows 7 64 bit Deal U2410 
KeyboardPowerMouse
Adesso Mechanical Silverstone OP650 Logitech G700 
  hide details  
Reply
post #68 of 91
well no matter what i love the fighting.
OH NOES
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2.6Ghz OEM Intel EXTREME!!! 2 2 x 256 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Western Digital Caviar 80Gb Emachine Cd-RW + Lite On DVD+-RW Windows XP HP CRT 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
emachines 250W Bestec Emachine Labtec 
Mouse Pad
None 
  hide details  
Reply
OH NOES
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2.6Ghz OEM Intel EXTREME!!! 2 2 x 256 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Western Digital Caviar 80Gb Emachine Cd-RW + Lite On DVD+-RW Windows XP HP CRT 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
emachines 250W Bestec Emachine Labtec 
Mouse Pad
None 
  hide details  
Reply
post #69 of 91
Yeah but they don't mention clock speeds. That Intel system may be their TOP of the line whereas this barcelona is still not final and may be at 2.2 GHZ. No one knows.
Workoholic REborn
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 2600K P8Z68-V PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 12GB 1x4GB+1x8GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Intel 520 Series WD Black ASUS DVD+RW Sunbeam Twister 120 
OSMonitorMonitorKeyboard
Windows 7 Ultimate LG OLED65C7P Oculus Rift Logitech K400 
PowerCaseMouse
Corsair 620 Modular Lian Li V1020B G9x 
  hide details  
Reply
Workoholic REborn
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 2600K P8Z68-V PRO NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 12GB 1x4GB+1x8GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Intel 520 Series WD Black ASUS DVD+RW Sunbeam Twister 120 
OSMonitorMonitorKeyboard
Windows 7 Ultimate LG OLED65C7P Oculus Rift Logitech K400 
PowerCaseMouse
Corsair 620 Modular Lian Li V1020B G9x 
  hide details  
Reply
post #70 of 91
man, I hope AMD will make a come back this time. I really like their products
My System
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5 4670k Gigabyte GA-Z87MX-D3H  Nvidia GTX 980 8GB AMD Entertainment 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Western Digital Blue 640GB Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 3 Windows 10 Pro LG 29um67 
PowerCaseMouse
Corsair RM750i Corsair Obsidian 350D Logitech G700s 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(11 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5 4670k Gigabyte GA-Z87MX-D3H  Nvidia GTX 980 8GB AMD Entertainment 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Western Digital Blue 640GB Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 3 Windows 10 Pro LG 29um67 
PowerCaseMouse
Corsair RM750i Corsair Obsidian 350D Logitech G700s 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › Intel responds to Barcelona benchmarks