Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Monitors and Displays › 1440x900 on a 1680x1050 monitor
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

1440x900 on a 1680x1050 monitor

post #1 of 7
Thread Starter 
im just going to order the samsung 206bw 20" monitor,the reason i ordered this instead of the 22" one, is im hoping if i have to drop the res down to 1440x900 for more fps, it will scale better on the smaller 20" screen,as any one used a 1680x1050 monitor at the lower res,how does it look.
My System
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
intel i5 2500k @4.1ghz asus p5kpl msi gamer r9 290 8gig g-skill ddr3 2x4gigs 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
mx500 ssd 240 gig pioneer 115 zalman windows 8.1 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
YAMAKASI QH2711 Black Label hiper silverstone 700w strider bronze atx 
Mouse
razer death adder 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
intel i5 2500k @4.1ghz asus p5kpl msi gamer r9 290 8gig g-skill ddr3 2x4gigs 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
mx500 ssd 240 gig pioneer 115 zalman windows 8.1 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
YAMAKASI QH2711 Black Label hiper silverstone 700w strider bronze atx 
Mouse
razer death adder 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 7
LCDs dont scale that well. They only look good at their native res. CRTs can scale pretty well usually.
Very nice!
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Duo E6600 Asus P5N32-E SLI EVGA 8800GTX 2 x 1GB GSkill HZ 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2 x WD Caviar SE16 250GB Sony NEC Optiarc 18x SATA DVD Windows XP Pro Gateway FPD2485W 24" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 PC P&C Silencer 610W Thermaltake Tsunami Logitech MX518 
  hide details  
Reply
Very nice!
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Duo E6600 Asus P5N32-E SLI EVGA 8800GTX 2 x 1GB GSkill HZ 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2 x WD Caviar SE16 250GB Sony NEC Optiarc 18x SATA DVD Windows XP Pro Gateway FPD2485W 24" 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 PC P&C Silencer 610W Thermaltake Tsunami Logitech MX518 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 7
Yeah, the scaling won't be any better. Either way, scaling up on an LCD sucks no matter how close the resolution is.
Studio Computer
(14 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 6700k Asus ROG Maximus VIII Ranger Sapphire Radeon R9 290 2x 8GB GSkill Ripjaws DDR4-3000 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
2x 120GB HyperX 3K SSD RAID0 CM Hyper 212 EVO Ubuntu 64 15.04/Win 7 Pro 64 30" Yamakasi Korean IPS 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
CM Storm Cherry Browns XFX 750W BE Azza Solano MX518 
AudioAudio
Tascam US-1800 KRK Rokit 8 G2 + KRK KNS8400 
  hide details  
Reply
Studio Computer
(14 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 6700k Asus ROG Maximus VIII Ranger Sapphire Radeon R9 290 2x 8GB GSkill Ripjaws DDR4-3000 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
2x 120GB HyperX 3K SSD RAID0 CM Hyper 212 EVO Ubuntu 64 15.04/Win 7 Pro 64 30" Yamakasi Korean IPS 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
CM Storm Cherry Browns XFX 750W BE Azza Solano MX518 
AudioAudio
Tascam US-1800 KRK Rokit 8 G2 + KRK KNS8400 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 7
I have the 226 BW and run only in 1680x1050,and 1080.No reason to run lower.If not why invest in a monitor like this.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E6850 SLA,G0,@3.7 P5N32 SLi/680iSB=Jing ting/nb=spirit II[1203]bios] MSI 470 GTX[order on his way] 4 gig ocz Reapers pc 8500 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
2 WD 250gig 16mb/raid 0\1 WD640 AALS 32MB win xp pro sp3/Windows 7 Beta LCD,22"=Samsung 2MS,226BW,52"samsung LN5A550 Thermaltake xaser 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
oczgamexstream700 wtt x blade/modded Razor deathadder thermaltake gamer pad/led 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E6850 SLA,G0,@3.7 P5N32 SLi/680iSB=Jing ting/nb=spirit II[1203]bios] MSI 470 GTX[order on his way] 4 gig ocz Reapers pc 8500 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
2 WD 250gig 16mb/raid 0\1 WD640 AALS 32MB win xp pro sp3/Windows 7 Beta LCD,22"=Samsung 2MS,226BW,52"samsung LN5A550 Thermaltake xaser 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
oczgamexstream700 wtt x blade/modded Razor deathadder thermaltake gamer pad/led 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5 of 7
With a 8800gts 320mb... why would you have framerate problems?
Once again...
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 [4.28GHz, HT] Asus P6T + Broadcom NetXtreme II VisionTek HD5850 [900/1200] + Galaxy GT240 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X [1632 MHz] 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel X25-M 160GB + 3xRAID0 500GB 7200.12 Window 7 Pro 64 Acer H243H + Samsung 226BW XARMOR-U9BL  
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec Truepower New 750W Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans] Logitech G9 X-Trac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
Once again...
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 [4.28GHz, HT] Asus P6T + Broadcom NetXtreme II VisionTek HD5850 [900/1200] + Galaxy GT240 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X [1632 MHz] 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel X25-M 160GB + 3xRAID0 500GB 7200.12 Window 7 Pro 64 Acer H243H + Samsung 226BW XARMOR-U9BL  
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec Truepower New 750W Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans] Logitech G9 X-Trac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieHo View Post
With a 8800gts 320mb... why would you have framerate problems?
Seriously dude, I don't even have framerate problems at 1680 with a 7900GS.
Studio Computer
(14 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 6700k Asus ROG Maximus VIII Ranger Sapphire Radeon R9 290 2x 8GB GSkill Ripjaws DDR4-3000 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
2x 120GB HyperX 3K SSD RAID0 CM Hyper 212 EVO Ubuntu 64 15.04/Win 7 Pro 64 30" Yamakasi Korean IPS 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
CM Storm Cherry Browns XFX 750W BE Azza Solano MX518 
AudioAudio
Tascam US-1800 KRK Rokit 8 G2 + KRK KNS8400 
  hide details  
Reply
Studio Computer
(14 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 6700k Asus ROG Maximus VIII Ranger Sapphire Radeon R9 290 2x 8GB GSkill Ripjaws DDR4-3000 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
2x 120GB HyperX 3K SSD RAID0 CM Hyper 212 EVO Ubuntu 64 15.04/Win 7 Pro 64 30" Yamakasi Korean IPS 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
CM Storm Cherry Browns XFX 750W BE Azza Solano MX518 
AudioAudio
Tascam US-1800 KRK Rokit 8 G2 + KRK KNS8400 
  hide details  
Reply
post #7 of 7
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronman View Post
Seriously dude, I don't even have framerate problems at 1680 with a 7900GS.
thats good to hear.just ordered one.i heard on some reveiws a 8800gts 640mb was needed.for 1680x1050.
My System
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
intel i5 2500k @4.1ghz asus p5kpl msi gamer r9 290 8gig g-skill ddr3 2x4gigs 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
mx500 ssd 240 gig pioneer 115 zalman windows 8.1 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
YAMAKASI QH2711 Black Label hiper silverstone 700w strider bronze atx 
Mouse
razer death adder 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
intel i5 2500k @4.1ghz asus p5kpl msi gamer r9 290 8gig g-skill ddr3 2x4gigs 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
mx500 ssd 240 gig pioneer 115 zalman windows 8.1 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
YAMAKASI QH2711 Black Label hiper silverstone 700w strider bronze atx 
Mouse
razer death adder 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Monitors and Displays
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Monitors and Displays › 1440x900 on a 1680x1050 monitor